Cargando…

Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Even in practices with a comprehensive appointment system a minority of patients walks in without prior notice, sometimes causing problems for practice service quality. We aimed to explore differences between patients consulting primary care practices with and without appointment. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riedl, Bernhard, Kehrer, Simon, Werner, Christoph U., Schneider, Antonius, Linde, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0787-5
_version_ 1783334444989415424
author Riedl, Bernhard
Kehrer, Simon
Werner, Christoph U.
Schneider, Antonius
Linde, Klaus
author_facet Riedl, Bernhard
Kehrer, Simon
Werner, Christoph U.
Schneider, Antonius
Linde, Klaus
author_sort Riedl, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Even in practices with a comprehensive appointment system a minority of patients walks in without prior notice, sometimes causing problems for practice service quality. We aimed to explore differences between patients consulting primary care practices with and without appointment. METHODS: Consecutive patients visiting five primary care practices without an appointment and following patients with an appointment were asked to fill in a four-page questionnaire addressing socio-demographic characteristics, the reason for encounter, urgency of seeing a physician, depressive, somatic and anxiety symptoms, personality traits, and satisfaction with the practice. Physicians also documented the reason for encounter and assessed the urgency. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one patients without and 250 patients with appointment participated. Patients without appointment were significantly younger (mean age 44 vs. 50 years) and reported less often chronic diseases (29% vs. 45%). Also, reasons for encounter differed (e.g., 27% vs. 16% with a respiratory problem). Patients’ ratings of urgency did not differ between groups (p = 0.46), but physicians rated urgency higher among patients without appointment (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analyses younger age, male gender, absence of chronic disease, positive screening for at least one mental disorder, low values on the personality trait openness for experience, a high urgency rating by the physician, and a respiratory or musculoskeletal problem as reason for encounter were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of being a patient without appointment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, younger age and a high urgency rating by physicians were the variables most consistently associated with the likelihood of being a patient without appointment. Overall, differences between patients seeking general practices with a comprehensive appointment system without prior notice and patients with appointments were relatively minor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6015657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60156572018-07-05 Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study Riedl, Bernhard Kehrer, Simon Werner, Christoph U. Schneider, Antonius Linde, Klaus BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Even in practices with a comprehensive appointment system a minority of patients walks in without prior notice, sometimes causing problems for practice service quality. We aimed to explore differences between patients consulting primary care practices with and without appointment. METHODS: Consecutive patients visiting five primary care practices without an appointment and following patients with an appointment were asked to fill in a four-page questionnaire addressing socio-demographic characteristics, the reason for encounter, urgency of seeing a physician, depressive, somatic and anxiety symptoms, personality traits, and satisfaction with the practice. Physicians also documented the reason for encounter and assessed the urgency. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one patients without and 250 patients with appointment participated. Patients without appointment were significantly younger (mean age 44 vs. 50 years) and reported less often chronic diseases (29% vs. 45%). Also, reasons for encounter differed (e.g., 27% vs. 16% with a respiratory problem). Patients’ ratings of urgency did not differ between groups (p = 0.46), but physicians rated urgency higher among patients without appointment (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analyses younger age, male gender, absence of chronic disease, positive screening for at least one mental disorder, low values on the personality trait openness for experience, a high urgency rating by the physician, and a respiratory or musculoskeletal problem as reason for encounter were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of being a patient without appointment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, younger age and a high urgency rating by physicians were the variables most consistently associated with the likelihood of being a patient without appointment. Overall, differences between patients seeking general practices with a comprehensive appointment system without prior notice and patients with appointments were relatively minor. BioMed Central 2018-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6015657/ /pubmed/29935538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0787-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Riedl, Bernhard
Kehrer, Simon
Werner, Christoph U.
Schneider, Antonius
Linde, Klaus
Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study
title Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study
title_full Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study
title_short Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study
title_sort do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0787-5
work_keys_str_mv AT riedlbernhard dogeneralpracticepatientswithandwithoutappointmentdiffercrosssectionalstudy
AT kehrersimon dogeneralpracticepatientswithandwithoutappointmentdiffercrosssectionalstudy
AT wernerchristophu dogeneralpracticepatientswithandwithoutappointmentdiffercrosssectionalstudy
AT schneiderantonius dogeneralpracticepatientswithandwithoutappointmentdiffercrosssectionalstudy
AT lindeklaus dogeneralpracticepatientswithandwithoutappointmentdiffercrosssectionalstudy