Cargando…

Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms

The anterior temporal lobes (ATLs) play a key role in conceptual knowledge representation. The hub-and-spoke theory suggests that the contribution of the ATLs to semantic representation is (a) transmodal, i.e. integrating information from multiple sensorimotor and verbal modalities, and (b) pan-cate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rice, Grace E., Hoffman, Paul, Binney, Richard J., Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29915004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0136
_version_ 1783334467081863168
author Rice, Grace E.
Hoffman, Paul
Binney, Richard J.
Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.
author_facet Rice, Grace E.
Hoffman, Paul
Binney, Richard J.
Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.
author_sort Rice, Grace E.
collection PubMed
description The anterior temporal lobes (ATLs) play a key role in conceptual knowledge representation. The hub-and-spoke theory suggests that the contribution of the ATLs to semantic representation is (a) transmodal, i.e. integrating information from multiple sensorimotor and verbal modalities, and (b) pan-categorical, representing concepts from all categories. Another literature, however, suggests that this region's responses are modality- and category-selective; prominent examples include category selectivity for socially relevant concepts and face recognition. The predictions of each approach have never been directly compared. We used data from three studies to compare category-selective responses within the ATLs. Study 1 compared ATL responses to famous people versus another conceptual category (landmarks) from visual versus auditory inputs. Study 2 compared ATL responses to famous people from pictorial and written word inputs. Study 3 compared ATL responses to a different kind of socially relevant stimuli, namely abstract non-person-related words, in order to ascertain whether ATL subregions are engaged for social concepts more generally or only for person-related knowledge. Across all three studies a dominant bilateral ventral ATL cluster responded to all categories in all modalities. Anterior to this ‘pan-category’ transmodal region, a second cluster responded more weakly overall yet selectively for people, but did so equally for spoken names and faces (Study 1). A third region in the anterior superior temporal gyrus responded selectively to abstract socially relevant words (Study 3), but did not respond to concrete socially relevant words (i.e. written names; Study 2). These findings can be accommodated by the graded hub-and-spoke model of concept representation. On this view, the ventral ATL is the centre point of a bilateral ATL hub, which contributes to conceptual representation through transmodal distillation of information arising from multiple modality-specific association cortices. Partial specialization occurs across the graded ATL hub as a consequence of gradedly differential connectivity across the region. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6015823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60158232018-06-25 Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms Rice, Grace E. Hoffman, Paul Binney, Richard J. Lambon Ralph, Matthew A. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles The anterior temporal lobes (ATLs) play a key role in conceptual knowledge representation. The hub-and-spoke theory suggests that the contribution of the ATLs to semantic representation is (a) transmodal, i.e. integrating information from multiple sensorimotor and verbal modalities, and (b) pan-categorical, representing concepts from all categories. Another literature, however, suggests that this region's responses are modality- and category-selective; prominent examples include category selectivity for socially relevant concepts and face recognition. The predictions of each approach have never been directly compared. We used data from three studies to compare category-selective responses within the ATLs. Study 1 compared ATL responses to famous people versus another conceptual category (landmarks) from visual versus auditory inputs. Study 2 compared ATL responses to famous people from pictorial and written word inputs. Study 3 compared ATL responses to a different kind of socially relevant stimuli, namely abstract non-person-related words, in order to ascertain whether ATL subregions are engaged for social concepts more generally or only for person-related knowledge. Across all three studies a dominant bilateral ventral ATL cluster responded to all categories in all modalities. Anterior to this ‘pan-category’ transmodal region, a second cluster responded more weakly overall yet selectively for people, but did so equally for spoken names and faces (Study 1). A third region in the anterior superior temporal gyrus responded selectively to abstract socially relevant words (Study 3), but did not respond to concrete socially relevant words (i.e. written names; Study 2). These findings can be accommodated by the graded hub-and-spoke model of concept representation. On this view, the ventral ATL is the centre point of a bilateral ATL hub, which contributes to conceptual representation through transmodal distillation of information arising from multiple modality-specific association cortices. Partial specialization occurs across the graded ATL hub as a consequence of gradedly differential connectivity across the region. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain’. The Royal Society 2018-08-05 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6015823/ /pubmed/29915004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0136 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Rice, Grace E.
Hoffman, Paul
Binney, Richard J.
Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.
Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms
title Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms
title_full Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms
title_fullStr Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms
title_full_unstemmed Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms
title_short Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms
title_sort concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fmri comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29915004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0136
work_keys_str_mv AT ricegracee concreteversusabstractformsofsocialconceptanfmricomparisonofknowledgeaboutpeopleversussocialterms
AT hoffmanpaul concreteversusabstractformsofsocialconceptanfmricomparisonofknowledgeaboutpeopleversussocialterms
AT binneyrichardj concreteversusabstractformsofsocialconceptanfmricomparisonofknowledgeaboutpeopleversussocialterms
AT lambonralphmatthewa concreteversusabstractformsofsocialconceptanfmricomparisonofknowledgeaboutpeopleversussocialterms