Cargando…

Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disc specimens (N=24, n=6 per group, ø7 mm×1 mm) were prepared using 4 resin-based luting cements (Duolink, Multilink N, Panavia F 2.0, and U-cem). The spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Seo-Young, An, Chang-Hyeon, Choi, Karp-Sik, Huh, Kyung-Hoe, Yi, Won-Jin, Heo, Min-Suk, Lee, Sam-Sun, Choi, Soon-Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963480
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.2.97
_version_ 1783334484334084096
author An, Seo-Young
An, Chang-Hyeon
Choi, Karp-Sik
Huh, Kyung-Hoe
Yi, Won-Jin
Heo, Min-Suk
Lee, Sam-Sun
Choi, Soon-Chul
author_facet An, Seo-Young
An, Chang-Hyeon
Choi, Karp-Sik
Huh, Kyung-Hoe
Yi, Won-Jin
Heo, Min-Suk
Lee, Sam-Sun
Choi, Soon-Chul
author_sort An, Seo-Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated the radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disc specimens (N=24, n=6 per group, ø7 mm×1 mm) were prepared using 4 resin-based luting cements (Duolink, Multilink N, Panavia F 2.0, and U-cem). The specimens were radiographed using films, a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensor, and a photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) with a 10-step aluminum step wedge (1 mm incremental steps) and a 1-mm-thick tooth cut. The settings were 70 kVp, 4 mA, and 30 cm, with an exposure time of 0.2 s for the films and 0.1 s for the CMOS sensor and PSP. The films were scanned using a scanner. The radiopacity of the luting cements and tooth was measured using a densitometer for the film and NIH ImageJ software for the images obtained from the CMOS sensor, PSP, and scanned films. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Multilink (3.44–4.33) showed the highest radiopacity, followed by U-cem (1.81–2.88), Panavia F 2.0 (1.51–2.69), and Duolink (1.48–2.59). The R(2) values of the optical density of the aluminum step wedge were 0.9923 for the films, 0.9989 for the PSP, 0.9986 for the scanned films, and 0.9266 for the CMOS sensor in the linear regression models. CONCLUSION: The radiopacities of the luting materials were greater than those of aluminum or dentin at the same thickness. PSP is recommended as a detector for radiopacity measurements because of its accuracy and convenience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6015930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60159302018-06-29 Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography An, Seo-Young An, Chang-Hyeon Choi, Karp-Sik Huh, Kyung-Hoe Yi, Won-Jin Heo, Min-Suk Lee, Sam-Sun Choi, Soon-Chul Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disc specimens (N=24, n=6 per group, ø7 mm×1 mm) were prepared using 4 resin-based luting cements (Duolink, Multilink N, Panavia F 2.0, and U-cem). The specimens were radiographed using films, a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensor, and a photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) with a 10-step aluminum step wedge (1 mm incremental steps) and a 1-mm-thick tooth cut. The settings were 70 kVp, 4 mA, and 30 cm, with an exposure time of 0.2 s for the films and 0.1 s for the CMOS sensor and PSP. The films were scanned using a scanner. The radiopacity of the luting cements and tooth was measured using a densitometer for the film and NIH ImageJ software for the images obtained from the CMOS sensor, PSP, and scanned films. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Multilink (3.44–4.33) showed the highest radiopacity, followed by U-cem (1.81–2.88), Panavia F 2.0 (1.51–2.69), and Duolink (1.48–2.59). The R(2) values of the optical density of the aluminum step wedge were 0.9923 for the films, 0.9989 for the PSP, 0.9986 for the scanned films, and 0.9266 for the CMOS sensor in the linear regression models. CONCLUSION: The radiopacities of the luting materials were greater than those of aluminum or dentin at the same thickness. PSP is recommended as a detector for radiopacity measurements because of its accuracy and convenience. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2018-06 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6015930/ /pubmed/29963480 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.2.97 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
An, Seo-Young
An, Chang-Hyeon
Choi, Karp-Sik
Huh, Kyung-Hoe
Yi, Won-Jin
Heo, Min-Suk
Lee, Sam-Sun
Choi, Soon-Chul
Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
title Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
title_full Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
title_fullStr Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
title_full_unstemmed Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
title_short Radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
title_sort radiopacity of contemporary luting cements using conventional and digital radiography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963480
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.2.97
work_keys_str_mv AT anseoyoung radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography
AT anchanghyeon radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography
AT choikarpsik radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography
AT huhkyunghoe radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography
AT yiwonjin radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography
AT heominsuk radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography
AT leesamsun radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography
AT choisoonchul radiopacityofcontemporarylutingcementsusingconventionalanddigitalradiography