Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of four doses of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate delivered via a metered dose inhaler compared with the monocomponents in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI 36/9.6, 36/7.2, 18/9.6, 9/9.6 µg) using innovative co-suspension delivery technology, compared with glycopyrrolate (GP) MDI 36 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) MDI 9.6 µg, in patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reisner, Colin, Pearle, James, Kerwin, Edward M, Rose, Earl St, Darken, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29950826
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S166455
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI 36/9.6, 36/7.2, 18/9.6, 9/9.6 µg) using innovative co-suspension delivery technology, compared with glycopyrrolate (GP) MDI 36 µg and formoterol fumarate (FF) MDI 9.6 µg, in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. METHODS: In this Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, balanced incomplete-block, two-period, cross-over study (NCT01349816), patients received treatment twice-daily for 7 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(0–12)) on Day 7. Secondary efficacy endpoints were peak change from baseline in FEV(1) through 2 hours; time to onset of action (≥10% improvement in mean FEV(1)); proportion of patients achieving ≥12% improvement in FEV(1) on Day 1; peak change from baseline in inspiratory capacity (IC) on Days 1 and 7; change from baseline in morning pre-dose FEV(1); peak change from baseline in FEV(1) through 6 hours; and change from baseline in mean evening 12-hour post-dose trough FEV(1) on Day 7. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: All 185 randomized patients received treatment. All doses of GFF MDI significantly improved the primary endpoint compared with GP MDI 36 µg (all P≤0.0137). For peak change in FEV(1) and IC and time to onset of action secondary endpoints, ≥2 doses of GFF MDI demonstrated superiority to GP MDI 36 µg. No significant differences were observed between GFF MDI and FF MDI 9.6 µg for primary and secondary endpoints. The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: While all doses of GFF MDI were superior to GP MDI 36 µg for the primary end-point, in this study neither superiority of GFF MDI to FF MDI 9.6 µg nor a clear dose-response was observed. All treatments were well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings.