Cargando…

The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the improvements of facial profile and postoperative stability by single mandibular setback surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included twenty-seven patients who underwent mandibular prognathism correction by sagittal split ramus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseng, Yu-Chuan, Cheng, Jung-Hsuan, Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien, Chen, Kwei-Jing, Chen, Chun-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4926528
_version_ 1783334517578137600
author Tseng, Yu-Chuan
Cheng, Jung-Hsuan
Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien
Chen, Kwei-Jing
Chen, Chun-Ming
author_facet Tseng, Yu-Chuan
Cheng, Jung-Hsuan
Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien
Chen, Kwei-Jing
Chen, Chun-Ming
author_sort Tseng, Yu-Chuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the improvements of facial profile and postoperative stability by single mandibular setback surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included twenty-seven patients who underwent mandibular prognathism correction by sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Cephalometric radiograms (lateral and frontal) were collected and analyzed at three intervals: preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and final follow-up postoperatively (T3). The lateral and frontal cephalometric parameters were measured. The immediate postoperative change (T21), postoperative stability (T32), and final surgical change (T31) were calculated and analyzed. The null hypothesis is that postoperative stability (T32) was not significantly correlated to amount of mandibular setback (T21). RESULTS: The immediate postoperative change (T21) of menton (Me) was significantly backward 8.7 mm. In the final postoperative change (T31), average chin points anterior movements were approximately 0.32 mm. Investigating frontal appearance, inter ramus posterior (InterRp) and intergonion (InterGo) widths were significantly increased with 1.8 and 2.2 mm, respectively. Bilateral ramus angles were not significantly increased, about 1°. The horizontal Me (T32) had significant correlation (p = 0.028) with amount of setback (T21). Therefore, null hypothesis is rejected. CONCLUSION: Postoperative relapse was significantly correlated to the amount of setback. The frontal transverse changes (InterRp and InterGo) were significantly increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6016152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60161522018-07-10 The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism Tseng, Yu-Chuan Cheng, Jung-Hsuan Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien Chen, Kwei-Jing Chen, Chun-Ming Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the improvements of facial profile and postoperative stability by single mandibular setback surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included twenty-seven patients who underwent mandibular prognathism correction by sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Cephalometric radiograms (lateral and frontal) were collected and analyzed at three intervals: preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and final follow-up postoperatively (T3). The lateral and frontal cephalometric parameters were measured. The immediate postoperative change (T21), postoperative stability (T32), and final surgical change (T31) were calculated and analyzed. The null hypothesis is that postoperative stability (T32) was not significantly correlated to amount of mandibular setback (T21). RESULTS: The immediate postoperative change (T21) of menton (Me) was significantly backward 8.7 mm. In the final postoperative change (T31), average chin points anterior movements were approximately 0.32 mm. Investigating frontal appearance, inter ramus posterior (InterRp) and intergonion (InterGo) widths were significantly increased with 1.8 and 2.2 mm, respectively. Bilateral ramus angles were not significantly increased, about 1°. The horizontal Me (T32) had significant correlation (p = 0.028) with amount of setback (T21). Therefore, null hypothesis is rejected. CONCLUSION: Postoperative relapse was significantly correlated to the amount of setback. The frontal transverse changes (InterRp and InterGo) were significantly increased. Hindawi 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6016152/ /pubmed/29992146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4926528 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yu-Chuan Tseng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tseng, Yu-Chuan
Cheng, Jung-Hsuan
Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien
Chen, Kwei-Jing
Chen, Chun-Ming
The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism
title The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism
title_full The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism
title_fullStr The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism
title_full_unstemmed The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism
title_short The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism
title_sort changes of cheek line (lateral) and face line (frontal) after correction of mandibular prognathism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4926528
work_keys_str_mv AT tsengyuchuan thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chengjunghsuan thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chenmichaelyuanchien thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chenkweijing thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chenchunming thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT tsengyuchuan changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chengjunghsuan changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chenmichaelyuanchien changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chenkweijing changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism
AT chenchunming changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism