Cargando…
The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the improvements of facial profile and postoperative stability by single mandibular setback surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included twenty-seven patients who underwent mandibular prognathism correction by sagittal split ramus...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4926528 |
_version_ | 1783334517578137600 |
---|---|
author | Tseng, Yu-Chuan Cheng, Jung-Hsuan Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien Chen, Kwei-Jing Chen, Chun-Ming |
author_facet | Tseng, Yu-Chuan Cheng, Jung-Hsuan Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien Chen, Kwei-Jing Chen, Chun-Ming |
author_sort | Tseng, Yu-Chuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the improvements of facial profile and postoperative stability by single mandibular setback surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included twenty-seven patients who underwent mandibular prognathism correction by sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Cephalometric radiograms (lateral and frontal) were collected and analyzed at three intervals: preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and final follow-up postoperatively (T3). The lateral and frontal cephalometric parameters were measured. The immediate postoperative change (T21), postoperative stability (T32), and final surgical change (T31) were calculated and analyzed. The null hypothesis is that postoperative stability (T32) was not significantly correlated to amount of mandibular setback (T21). RESULTS: The immediate postoperative change (T21) of menton (Me) was significantly backward 8.7 mm. In the final postoperative change (T31), average chin points anterior movements were approximately 0.32 mm. Investigating frontal appearance, inter ramus posterior (InterRp) and intergonion (InterGo) widths were significantly increased with 1.8 and 2.2 mm, respectively. Bilateral ramus angles were not significantly increased, about 1°. The horizontal Me (T32) had significant correlation (p = 0.028) with amount of setback (T21). Therefore, null hypothesis is rejected. CONCLUSION: Postoperative relapse was significantly correlated to the amount of setback. The frontal transverse changes (InterRp and InterGo) were significantly increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6016152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60161522018-07-10 The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism Tseng, Yu-Chuan Cheng, Jung-Hsuan Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien Chen, Kwei-Jing Chen, Chun-Ming Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the improvements of facial profile and postoperative stability by single mandibular setback surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included twenty-seven patients who underwent mandibular prognathism correction by sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Cephalometric radiograms (lateral and frontal) were collected and analyzed at three intervals: preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and final follow-up postoperatively (T3). The lateral and frontal cephalometric parameters were measured. The immediate postoperative change (T21), postoperative stability (T32), and final surgical change (T31) were calculated and analyzed. The null hypothesis is that postoperative stability (T32) was not significantly correlated to amount of mandibular setback (T21). RESULTS: The immediate postoperative change (T21) of menton (Me) was significantly backward 8.7 mm. In the final postoperative change (T31), average chin points anterior movements were approximately 0.32 mm. Investigating frontal appearance, inter ramus posterior (InterRp) and intergonion (InterGo) widths were significantly increased with 1.8 and 2.2 mm, respectively. Bilateral ramus angles were not significantly increased, about 1°. The horizontal Me (T32) had significant correlation (p = 0.028) with amount of setback (T21). Therefore, null hypothesis is rejected. CONCLUSION: Postoperative relapse was significantly correlated to the amount of setback. The frontal transverse changes (InterRp and InterGo) were significantly increased. Hindawi 2018-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6016152/ /pubmed/29992146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4926528 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yu-Chuan Tseng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tseng, Yu-Chuan Cheng, Jung-Hsuan Chen, Michael Yuan-Chien Chen, Kwei-Jing Chen, Chun-Ming The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism |
title | The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism |
title_full | The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism |
title_fullStr | The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism |
title_full_unstemmed | The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism |
title_short | The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism |
title_sort | changes of cheek line (lateral) and face line (frontal) after correction of mandibular prognathism |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4926528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsengyuchuan thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chengjunghsuan thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chenmichaelyuanchien thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chenkweijing thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chenchunming thechangesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT tsengyuchuan changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chengjunghsuan changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chenmichaelyuanchien changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chenkweijing changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism AT chenchunming changesofcheeklinelateralandfacelinefrontalaftercorrectionofmandibularprognathism |