Cargando…

The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: A combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard of treatment for glioblastoma (GB). Bevacizumab (BEV), a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor A, has produced impressive r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Ke-Li, Huang, Song, Wu, Yu-Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29950856
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S156723
_version_ 1783334542101184512
author Liao, Ke-Li
Huang, Song
Wu, Yu-Peng
author_facet Liao, Ke-Li
Huang, Song
Wu, Yu-Peng
author_sort Liao, Ke-Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard of treatment for glioblastoma (GB). Bevacizumab (BEV), a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor A, has produced impressive response rates for recurrent GB and has been approved as second-line therapy. The efficacy and safety of BEV in newly diagnosed GB are not known. AIM: This systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the value of combination therapy involving BEV in newly diagnosed GB. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for eligible literature up to October 2017. Randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of BEV in patients with newly diagnosed GB were included, of which the main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). All the data were pooled with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using RevMan software. Sensitivity analyses and heterogeneity were quantitatively evaluated. RESULTS: A total of six randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis. The experimental BEV group had significantly improved the overall PFS (OR =0.46, 95% CI =0.26–0.81, P=0.007), as well as PFS at 6 months (OR =3.47, 95% CI =2.85–4.22, P<0.00001) and PFS at 12 months (OR =2.02, 95% CI =1.66–2.46, P<0.00001), respectively. However, there were no significant differences in PFS at 24 months with BEV (OR =0.95, 95% CI =0.61–1.48, P=0.82). OS at 6 months (P=0.07) and 24 months (P=0.07) was not significantly improved with BEV in patients with newly diagnosed GB. However, the meta-analysis on the OS at 12 months showed differences with BEV (OR =1.24, 95% CI =1.03–1.50, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that addition of BEV for newly diagnosed GB resulted in a superior PFS rate. However, the combination therapy involving BEV did not improve OS. Future investigations are needed to analyze whether BEV helps improve OS efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6016281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60162812018-06-27 The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis Liao, Ke-Li Huang, Song Wu, Yu-Peng Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: A combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard of treatment for glioblastoma (GB). Bevacizumab (BEV), a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor A, has produced impressive response rates for recurrent GB and has been approved as second-line therapy. The efficacy and safety of BEV in newly diagnosed GB are not known. AIM: This systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the value of combination therapy involving BEV in newly diagnosed GB. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for eligible literature up to October 2017. Randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of BEV in patients with newly diagnosed GB were included, of which the main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). All the data were pooled with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using RevMan software. Sensitivity analyses and heterogeneity were quantitatively evaluated. RESULTS: A total of six randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis. The experimental BEV group had significantly improved the overall PFS (OR =0.46, 95% CI =0.26–0.81, P=0.007), as well as PFS at 6 months (OR =3.47, 95% CI =2.85–4.22, P<0.00001) and PFS at 12 months (OR =2.02, 95% CI =1.66–2.46, P<0.00001), respectively. However, there were no significant differences in PFS at 24 months with BEV (OR =0.95, 95% CI =0.61–1.48, P=0.82). OS at 6 months (P=0.07) and 24 months (P=0.07) was not significantly improved with BEV in patients with newly diagnosed GB. However, the meta-analysis on the OS at 12 months showed differences with BEV (OR =1.24, 95% CI =1.03–1.50, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that addition of BEV for newly diagnosed GB resulted in a superior PFS rate. However, the combination therapy involving BEV did not improve OS. Future investigations are needed to analyze whether BEV helps improve OS efficacy. Dove Medical Press 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6016281/ /pubmed/29950856 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S156723 Text en © 2018 Liao et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Liao, Ke-Li
Huang, Song
Wu, Yu-Peng
The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis
title The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis
title_full The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis
title_short The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis
title_sort prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29950856
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S156723
work_keys_str_mv AT liaokeli theprognosisforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomareceivingbevacizumabcombinationtherapyametaanalysis
AT huangsong theprognosisforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomareceivingbevacizumabcombinationtherapyametaanalysis
AT wuyupeng theprognosisforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomareceivingbevacizumabcombinationtherapyametaanalysis
AT liaokeli prognosisforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomareceivingbevacizumabcombinationtherapyametaanalysis
AT huangsong prognosisforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomareceivingbevacizumabcombinationtherapyametaanalysis
AT wuyupeng prognosisforpatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomareceivingbevacizumabcombinationtherapyametaanalysis