Cargando…

Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION: Various suture materials and suture techniques are used to perform gastrointestinal anastomosis after tumour resection, but the best combination is still a matter of debate. METHODS: This multi-centre, international, single-arm, prospective observational study aimed at demonstrating th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumann, Petra, Kim, Jongwon, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Kim, Hyung-Ho, Chong, Hoong-Yin, Wente, Moritz N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.04.003
_version_ 1783334551594991616
author Baumann, Petra
Kim, Jongwon
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Kim, Hyung-Ho
Chong, Hoong-Yin
Wente, Moritz N.
author_facet Baumann, Petra
Kim, Jongwon
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Kim, Hyung-Ho
Chong, Hoong-Yin
Wente, Moritz N.
author_sort Baumann, Petra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Various suture materials and suture techniques are used to perform gastrointestinal anastomosis after tumour resection, but the best combination is still a matter of debate. METHODS: This multi-centre, international, single-arm, prospective observational study aimed at demonstrating the non-inferiority of a mid-term absorbable monofilament in comparison to braided sutures in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Monosyn suture was used to create the gastrointestinal anastomosis and the frequency of anastomotic leakage until day of discharge was chosen as the primary parameter. The outcome was compared to the results published for braided sutures in the literature. Secondary parameters were the time to perform the anastomosis, length of hospital stay, costs, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The anastomosis leakage rate was 2.91%, indicating that Monosyn suture was not inferior to braided sutures used in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Of the reported anastomotic suture techniques, the single layer continuous method was the fastest and most economical technique in the present observational study. CONCLUSION: Monosyn suture is safe and effective in gastrointestinal anastomosis and represents a good alternative to other sutures used for gastrointestinal anastomosis. With regard to safety, time and cost-efficiency, the single-layer continuous technique should be considered a preferred method. The transfer of results from clinical studies into daily practice with regard to surgical techniques for gastrointestinal anastomosis should be further evaluated in larger studies or in nationwide registries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6016322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60163222018-06-26 Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study Baumann, Petra Kim, Jongwon Ahn, Sang-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Ho Chong, Hoong-Yin Wente, Moritz N. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Various suture materials and suture techniques are used to perform gastrointestinal anastomosis after tumour resection, but the best combination is still a matter of debate. METHODS: This multi-centre, international, single-arm, prospective observational study aimed at demonstrating the non-inferiority of a mid-term absorbable monofilament in comparison to braided sutures in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Monosyn suture was used to create the gastrointestinal anastomosis and the frequency of anastomotic leakage until day of discharge was chosen as the primary parameter. The outcome was compared to the results published for braided sutures in the literature. Secondary parameters were the time to perform the anastomosis, length of hospital stay, costs, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The anastomosis leakage rate was 2.91%, indicating that Monosyn suture was not inferior to braided sutures used in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Of the reported anastomotic suture techniques, the single layer continuous method was the fastest and most economical technique in the present observational study. CONCLUSION: Monosyn suture is safe and effective in gastrointestinal anastomosis and represents a good alternative to other sutures used for gastrointestinal anastomosis. With regard to safety, time and cost-efficiency, the single-layer continuous technique should be considered a preferred method. The transfer of results from clinical studies into daily practice with regard to surgical techniques for gastrointestinal anastomosis should be further evaluated in larger studies or in nationwide registries. Elsevier 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6016322/ /pubmed/29946452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.04.003 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Baumann, Petra
Kim, Jongwon
Ahn, Sang-Hoon
Kim, Hyung-Ho
Chong, Hoong-Yin
Wente, Moritz N.
Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study
title Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study
title_full Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study
title_fullStr Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study
title_short Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study
title_sort mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis – promegat - a single-arm prospective observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29946452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.04.003
work_keys_str_mv AT baumannpetra midtermabsorbablemonofilamentissafeandeffectiveforgastrointestinalanastomosispromegatasinglearmprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kimjongwon midtermabsorbablemonofilamentissafeandeffectiveforgastrointestinalanastomosispromegatasinglearmprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ahnsanghoon midtermabsorbablemonofilamentissafeandeffectiveforgastrointestinalanastomosispromegatasinglearmprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kimhyungho midtermabsorbablemonofilamentissafeandeffectiveforgastrointestinalanastomosispromegatasinglearmprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT chonghoongyin midtermabsorbablemonofilamentissafeandeffectiveforgastrointestinalanastomosispromegatasinglearmprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wentemoritzn midtermabsorbablemonofilamentissafeandeffectiveforgastrointestinalanastomosispromegatasinglearmprospectiveobservationalstudy