Cargando…

A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) research is a key component of the End TB Strategy. To track research output, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of TB research from the past decade. METHODS: The Web of Science database was searched for publications from January 2007 to December 2016 with “tuberculos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nafade, Vaidehi, Nash, Madlen, Huddart, Sophie, Pande, Tripti, Gebreselassie, Nebiat, Lienhardt, Christian, Pai, Madhukar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199706
_version_ 1783334628956831744
author Nafade, Vaidehi
Nash, Madlen
Huddart, Sophie
Pande, Tripti
Gebreselassie, Nebiat
Lienhardt, Christian
Pai, Madhukar
author_facet Nafade, Vaidehi
Nash, Madlen
Huddart, Sophie
Pande, Tripti
Gebreselassie, Nebiat
Lienhardt, Christian
Pai, Madhukar
author_sort Nafade, Vaidehi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) research is a key component of the End TB Strategy. To track research output, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of TB research from the past decade. METHODS: The Web of Science database was searched for publications from January 2007 to December 2016 with “tuberculosis” in the title. References were analysed using the R bibliometrix package. A year-stratified 5% random subset was drawn to extract funding sources and identify research areas. FINDINGS: The annual growth rate of publications was 7.3%, and was highest (13.1%) among Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS). The USA was the most productive country, with 18.4% of references, followed by India (9.7%), China (7.3%), England (6.5%), and South Africa (3.9%). In the subset analysis, the most common research area was ‘fundamental research’ (33.8%). Frequently acknowledged funders were US and EU-based, with China and India emerging as top funders. Collaborations appeared more frequently between high-income countries and low/medium income countries (LMICs), with fewer collaborations among LMICs. CONCLUSION: The past decade has seen a continued increase in TB publications. While USA continues to dominate research output and funding, BRICS countries have emerged as major research producers and funders. Collaborations among BRICS would enhance future TB research productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6016906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60169062018-07-07 A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 Nafade, Vaidehi Nash, Madlen Huddart, Sophie Pande, Tripti Gebreselassie, Nebiat Lienhardt, Christian Pai, Madhukar PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) research is a key component of the End TB Strategy. To track research output, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of TB research from the past decade. METHODS: The Web of Science database was searched for publications from January 2007 to December 2016 with “tuberculosis” in the title. References were analysed using the R bibliometrix package. A year-stratified 5% random subset was drawn to extract funding sources and identify research areas. FINDINGS: The annual growth rate of publications was 7.3%, and was highest (13.1%) among Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS). The USA was the most productive country, with 18.4% of references, followed by India (9.7%), China (7.3%), England (6.5%), and South Africa (3.9%). In the subset analysis, the most common research area was ‘fundamental research’ (33.8%). Frequently acknowledged funders were US and EU-based, with China and India emerging as top funders. Collaborations appeared more frequently between high-income countries and low/medium income countries (LMICs), with fewer collaborations among LMICs. CONCLUSION: The past decade has seen a continued increase in TB publications. While USA continues to dominate research output and funding, BRICS countries have emerged as major research producers and funders. Collaborations among BRICS would enhance future TB research productivity. Public Library of Science 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6016906/ /pubmed/29940004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199706 Text en © 2018 Nafade et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nafade, Vaidehi
Nash, Madlen
Huddart, Sophie
Pande, Tripti
Gebreselassie, Nebiat
Lienhardt, Christian
Pai, Madhukar
A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
title A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
title_full A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
title_fullStr A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
title_short A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
title_sort bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199706
work_keys_str_mv AT nafadevaidehi abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT nashmadlen abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT huddartsophie abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT pandetripti abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT gebreselassienebiat abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT lienhardtchristian abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT paimadhukar abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT nafadevaidehi bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT nashmadlen bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT huddartsophie bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT pandetripti bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT gebreselassienebiat bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT lienhardtchristian bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016
AT paimadhukar bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016