Cargando…
A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) research is a key component of the End TB Strategy. To track research output, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of TB research from the past decade. METHODS: The Web of Science database was searched for publications from January 2007 to December 2016 with “tuberculos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199706 |
_version_ | 1783334628956831744 |
---|---|
author | Nafade, Vaidehi Nash, Madlen Huddart, Sophie Pande, Tripti Gebreselassie, Nebiat Lienhardt, Christian Pai, Madhukar |
author_facet | Nafade, Vaidehi Nash, Madlen Huddart, Sophie Pande, Tripti Gebreselassie, Nebiat Lienhardt, Christian Pai, Madhukar |
author_sort | Nafade, Vaidehi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) research is a key component of the End TB Strategy. To track research output, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of TB research from the past decade. METHODS: The Web of Science database was searched for publications from January 2007 to December 2016 with “tuberculosis” in the title. References were analysed using the R bibliometrix package. A year-stratified 5% random subset was drawn to extract funding sources and identify research areas. FINDINGS: The annual growth rate of publications was 7.3%, and was highest (13.1%) among Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS). The USA was the most productive country, with 18.4% of references, followed by India (9.7%), China (7.3%), England (6.5%), and South Africa (3.9%). In the subset analysis, the most common research area was ‘fundamental research’ (33.8%). Frequently acknowledged funders were US and EU-based, with China and India emerging as top funders. Collaborations appeared more frequently between high-income countries and low/medium income countries (LMICs), with fewer collaborations among LMICs. CONCLUSION: The past decade has seen a continued increase in TB publications. While USA continues to dominate research output and funding, BRICS countries have emerged as major research producers and funders. Collaborations among BRICS would enhance future TB research productivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6016906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60169062018-07-07 A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 Nafade, Vaidehi Nash, Madlen Huddart, Sophie Pande, Tripti Gebreselassie, Nebiat Lienhardt, Christian Pai, Madhukar PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) research is a key component of the End TB Strategy. To track research output, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of TB research from the past decade. METHODS: The Web of Science database was searched for publications from January 2007 to December 2016 with “tuberculosis” in the title. References were analysed using the R bibliometrix package. A year-stratified 5% random subset was drawn to extract funding sources and identify research areas. FINDINGS: The annual growth rate of publications was 7.3%, and was highest (13.1%) among Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS). The USA was the most productive country, with 18.4% of references, followed by India (9.7%), China (7.3%), England (6.5%), and South Africa (3.9%). In the subset analysis, the most common research area was ‘fundamental research’ (33.8%). Frequently acknowledged funders were US and EU-based, with China and India emerging as top funders. Collaborations appeared more frequently between high-income countries and low/medium income countries (LMICs), with fewer collaborations among LMICs. CONCLUSION: The past decade has seen a continued increase in TB publications. While USA continues to dominate research output and funding, BRICS countries have emerged as major research producers and funders. Collaborations among BRICS would enhance future TB research productivity. Public Library of Science 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6016906/ /pubmed/29940004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199706 Text en © 2018 Nafade et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nafade, Vaidehi Nash, Madlen Huddart, Sophie Pande, Tripti Gebreselassie, Nebiat Lienhardt, Christian Pai, Madhukar A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 |
title | A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 |
title_full | A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 |
title_fullStr | A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 |
title_short | A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 |
title_sort | bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nafadevaidehi abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT nashmadlen abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT huddartsophie abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT pandetripti abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT gebreselassienebiat abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT lienhardtchristian abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT paimadhukar abibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT nafadevaidehi bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT nashmadlen bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT huddartsophie bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT pandetripti bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT gebreselassienebiat bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT lienhardtchristian bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 AT paimadhukar bibliometricanalysisoftuberculosisresearch20072016 |