Cargando…

Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers

Adulteration of edible oils has attracted attention from more researchers and consumers in recent years. Complex multispecies adulteration is a commonly used strategy to mask the traditional adulteration detection methods. Most of the researchers were only concerned about single targeted adulterants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dou, Xinjing, Mao, Jin, Zhang, Liangxiao, Xie, Huali, Chen, Lin, Yu, Li, Ma, Fei, Wang, Xiupin, Zhang, Qi, Li, Peiwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6017810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020241
_version_ 1783334830892646400
author Dou, Xinjing
Mao, Jin
Zhang, Liangxiao
Xie, Huali
Chen, Lin
Yu, Li
Ma, Fei
Wang, Xiupin
Zhang, Qi
Li, Peiwu
author_facet Dou, Xinjing
Mao, Jin
Zhang, Liangxiao
Xie, Huali
Chen, Lin
Yu, Li
Ma, Fei
Wang, Xiupin
Zhang, Qi
Li, Peiwu
author_sort Dou, Xinjing
collection PubMed
description Adulteration of edible oils has attracted attention from more researchers and consumers in recent years. Complex multispecies adulteration is a commonly used strategy to mask the traditional adulteration detection methods. Most of the researchers were only concerned about single targeted adulterants, however, it was difficult to identify complex multispecies adulteration or untargeted adulterants. To detect adulteration of edible oil, identification of characteristic markers of adulterants was proposed to be an effective method, which could provide a solution for multispecies adulteration detection. In this study, a simple method of multispecies adulteration detection for camellia oil (adulterated with soybean oil, peanut oil, rapeseed oil) was developed by quantifying chemical markers including four isoflavones, trans-resveratrol and sinapic acid, which used liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) combined with solid phase extraction (SPE). In commercial camellia oil, only two of them were detected of daidzin with the average content of 0.06 ng/g while other markers were absent. The developed method was highly sensitive as the limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.02 ng/mL to 0.16 ng/mL and the mean recoveries ranged from 79.7% to 113.5%, indicating that this method was reliable to detect potential characteristic markers in edible oils. Six target compounds for pure camellia oils, soybean oils, peanut oils and rapeseed oils had been analyzed to get the results. The validation results indicated that this simple and rapid method was successfully employed to determine multispecies adulteration of camellia oil adulterated with soybean, peanut and rapeseed oils.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6017810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60178102018-11-13 Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers Dou, Xinjing Mao, Jin Zhang, Liangxiao Xie, Huali Chen, Lin Yu, Li Ma, Fei Wang, Xiupin Zhang, Qi Li, Peiwu Molecules Article Adulteration of edible oils has attracted attention from more researchers and consumers in recent years. Complex multispecies adulteration is a commonly used strategy to mask the traditional adulteration detection methods. Most of the researchers were only concerned about single targeted adulterants, however, it was difficult to identify complex multispecies adulteration or untargeted adulterants. To detect adulteration of edible oil, identification of characteristic markers of adulterants was proposed to be an effective method, which could provide a solution for multispecies adulteration detection. In this study, a simple method of multispecies adulteration detection for camellia oil (adulterated with soybean oil, peanut oil, rapeseed oil) was developed by quantifying chemical markers including four isoflavones, trans-resveratrol and sinapic acid, which used liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) combined with solid phase extraction (SPE). In commercial camellia oil, only two of them were detected of daidzin with the average content of 0.06 ng/g while other markers were absent. The developed method was highly sensitive as the limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.02 ng/mL to 0.16 ng/mL and the mean recoveries ranged from 79.7% to 113.5%, indicating that this method was reliable to detect potential characteristic markers in edible oils. Six target compounds for pure camellia oils, soybean oils, peanut oils and rapeseed oils had been analyzed to get the results. The validation results indicated that this simple and rapid method was successfully employed to determine multispecies adulteration of camellia oil adulterated with soybean, peanut and rapeseed oils. MDPI 2018-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6017810/ /pubmed/29370131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020241 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dou, Xinjing
Mao, Jin
Zhang, Liangxiao
Xie, Huali
Chen, Lin
Yu, Li
Ma, Fei
Wang, Xiupin
Zhang, Qi
Li, Peiwu
Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers
title Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers
title_full Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers
title_fullStr Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers
title_full_unstemmed Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers
title_short Multispecies Adulteration Detection of Camellia Oil by Chemical Markers
title_sort multispecies adulteration detection of camellia oil by chemical markers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6017810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020241
work_keys_str_mv AT douxinjing multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT maojin multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT zhangliangxiao multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT xiehuali multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT chenlin multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT yuli multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT mafei multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT wangxiupin multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT zhangqi multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers
AT lipeiwu multispeciesadulterationdetectionofcamelliaoilbychemicalmarkers