Cargando…

Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective

Water productivity (WP) is a robust benchmark for crop production in relation to available water supply across spatial scales. Quantifying water-limited potential (WPw) and actual on-farm (WPa) WP to estimate WP gaps is an essential first step to identify the most sensitive factors influencing produ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rattalino Edreira, Juan I., Guilpart, Nicolas, Sadras, Victor, Cassman, Kenneth G., van Ittersum, Martin K., Schils, René L.M., Grassini, Patricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.05.019
_version_ 1783334872818909184
author Rattalino Edreira, Juan I.
Guilpart, Nicolas
Sadras, Victor
Cassman, Kenneth G.
van Ittersum, Martin K.
Schils, René L.M.
Grassini, Patricio
author_facet Rattalino Edreira, Juan I.
Guilpart, Nicolas
Sadras, Victor
Cassman, Kenneth G.
van Ittersum, Martin K.
Schils, René L.M.
Grassini, Patricio
author_sort Rattalino Edreira, Juan I.
collection PubMed
description Water productivity (WP) is a robust benchmark for crop production in relation to available water supply across spatial scales. Quantifying water-limited potential (WPw) and actual on-farm (WPa) WP to estimate WP gaps is an essential first step to identify the most sensitive factors influencing production capacity with limited water supply. This study combines local weather, soil, and agronomic data, and crop modeling in a spatial framework to determine WPw and WPa at local and regional levels for rainfed cropping systems in 17 (maize) and 18 (wheat) major grain-producing countries representing a wide range of cropping systems, from intensive, high-yield maize in north America and wheat in west Europe to low-input, low-yield maize systems in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. WP was calculated as the quotient of either water-limited yield potential or actual yield, and simulated crop evapotranspiration. Estimated WPw upper limits compared well with maximum WP reported for field-grown crops. However, there was large WPw variation across regions with different climate and soil (CV = 29% for maize and 27% for wheat), which cautions against the use of generic WPw benchmarks and highlights the need for region-specific WPw. Differences in simulated evaporative demand, crop evapotranspiration after flowering, soil evaporation, and intensity of water stress around flowering collectively explained two thirds of the variation in WPw. Average WP gaps were 13 (maize) and 10 (wheat) kg ha(−1) mm(−1), equivalent to about half of their respective WPw. We found that non-water related factors (i.e., management deficiencies, biotic and abiotic stresses, and their interactions) constrained yield more than water supply in ca. half of the regions. These findings highlight the opportunity to produce more food with same amount of water, provided limiting factors other than water supply can be identified and alleviated with improved management practices. Our study provides a consistent protocol for estimating WP at local to regional scale, which can be used to understand WP gaps and their mitigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6018065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier Science Publishers B.V
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60180652018-09-15 Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective Rattalino Edreira, Juan I. Guilpart, Nicolas Sadras, Victor Cassman, Kenneth G. van Ittersum, Martin K. Schils, René L.M. Grassini, Patricio Agric For Meteorol Article Water productivity (WP) is a robust benchmark for crop production in relation to available water supply across spatial scales. Quantifying water-limited potential (WPw) and actual on-farm (WPa) WP to estimate WP gaps is an essential first step to identify the most sensitive factors influencing production capacity with limited water supply. This study combines local weather, soil, and agronomic data, and crop modeling in a spatial framework to determine WPw and WPa at local and regional levels for rainfed cropping systems in 17 (maize) and 18 (wheat) major grain-producing countries representing a wide range of cropping systems, from intensive, high-yield maize in north America and wheat in west Europe to low-input, low-yield maize systems in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. WP was calculated as the quotient of either water-limited yield potential or actual yield, and simulated crop evapotranspiration. Estimated WPw upper limits compared well with maximum WP reported for field-grown crops. However, there was large WPw variation across regions with different climate and soil (CV = 29% for maize and 27% for wheat), which cautions against the use of generic WPw benchmarks and highlights the need for region-specific WPw. Differences in simulated evaporative demand, crop evapotranspiration after flowering, soil evaporation, and intensity of water stress around flowering collectively explained two thirds of the variation in WPw. Average WP gaps were 13 (maize) and 10 (wheat) kg ha(−1) mm(−1), equivalent to about half of their respective WPw. We found that non-water related factors (i.e., management deficiencies, biotic and abiotic stresses, and their interactions) constrained yield more than water supply in ca. half of the regions. These findings highlight the opportunity to produce more food with same amount of water, provided limiting factors other than water supply can be identified and alleviated with improved management practices. Our study provides a consistent protocol for estimating WP at local to regional scale, which can be used to understand WP gaps and their mitigation. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6018065/ /pubmed/30224833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.05.019 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rattalino Edreira, Juan I.
Guilpart, Nicolas
Sadras, Victor
Cassman, Kenneth G.
van Ittersum, Martin K.
Schils, René L.M.
Grassini, Patricio
Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective
title Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective
title_full Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective
title_fullStr Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective
title_full_unstemmed Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective
title_short Water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: A local to global perspective
title_sort water productivity of rainfed maize and wheat: a local to global perspective
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30224833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.05.019
work_keys_str_mv AT rattalinoedreirajuani waterproductivityofrainfedmaizeandwheatalocaltoglobalperspective
AT guilpartnicolas waterproductivityofrainfedmaizeandwheatalocaltoglobalperspective
AT sadrasvictor waterproductivityofrainfedmaizeandwheatalocaltoglobalperspective
AT cassmankennethg waterproductivityofrainfedmaizeandwheatalocaltoglobalperspective
AT vanittersummartink waterproductivityofrainfedmaizeandwheatalocaltoglobalperspective
AT schilsrenelm waterproductivityofrainfedmaizeandwheatalocaltoglobalperspective
AT grassinipatricio waterproductivityofrainfedmaizeandwheatalocaltoglobalperspective