Cargando…

Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss

BACKGROUND: Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact “air puff” Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ing, Edsel, Zhang, Angela, Michaelov, Evan, Wang, Wendy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008972
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010104
_version_ 1783334887281917952
author Ing, Edsel
Zhang, Angela
Michaelov, Evan
Wang, Wendy
author_facet Ing, Edsel
Zhang, Angela
Michaelov, Evan
Wang, Wendy
author_sort Ing, Edsel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact “air puff” Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with headache or vision loss. OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement between DCT and NCT. METHODS: The IOP of adult patients 50 years of age or older presenting with headache or vision loss for possible temporal artery biopsy were prospectively recorded. NCT and DCT measurements were obtained within thirty minutes. The right eye IOP measurements were compared with paired t-test, and Bland- Altman plot analysis. The left eye IOP measurements were subsequently analyzed for confirmation of results. RESULTS: There were 106 subjects with complete right eye data, and 104 subjects with complete left eye data. The average age was 72 years, and 70% were female. The NCT IOP was on average 3.9 mm Hg lower in the right eye, and 3.5 mm Hg lower in the left eye compared with DCT. (p<.001) In the right eye the Bland-Altman analysis showed the 95% agreement interval between the two tonometers was -2.5 to 10.4 mmHg and in the left eye -3.0 to 9.9 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The IOP from NCT and DCT should not be used interchangeably because their level of disagreement includes clinically important discrepancies of up to 10 mm Hg.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6018127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60181272018-07-13 Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss Ing, Edsel Zhang, Angela Michaelov, Evan Wang, Wendy Open Ophthalmol J Ophthalmology BACKGROUND: Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact “air puff” Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with headache or vision loss. OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement between DCT and NCT. METHODS: The IOP of adult patients 50 years of age or older presenting with headache or vision loss for possible temporal artery biopsy were prospectively recorded. NCT and DCT measurements were obtained within thirty minutes. The right eye IOP measurements were compared with paired t-test, and Bland- Altman plot analysis. The left eye IOP measurements were subsequently analyzed for confirmation of results. RESULTS: There were 106 subjects with complete right eye data, and 104 subjects with complete left eye data. The average age was 72 years, and 70% were female. The NCT IOP was on average 3.9 mm Hg lower in the right eye, and 3.5 mm Hg lower in the left eye compared with DCT. (p<.001) In the right eye the Bland-Altman analysis showed the 95% agreement interval between the two tonometers was -2.5 to 10.4 mmHg and in the left eye -3.0 to 9.9 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The IOP from NCT and DCT should not be used interchangeably because their level of disagreement includes clinically important discrepancies of up to 10 mm Hg. Bentham Open 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6018127/ /pubmed/30008972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010104 Text en © 2018 Ing et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
Ing, Edsel
Zhang, Angela
Michaelov, Evan
Wang, Wendy
Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss
title Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss
title_full Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss
title_fullStr Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss
title_short Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss
title_sort comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and non-contact tonometry in older patients presenting with headache or vision loss
topic Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008972
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010104
work_keys_str_mv AT ingedsel comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss
AT zhangangela comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss
AT michaelovevan comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss
AT wangwendy comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss