Cargando…
Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss
BACKGROUND: Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact “air puff” Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with he...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010104 |
_version_ | 1783334887281917952 |
---|---|
author | Ing, Edsel Zhang, Angela Michaelov, Evan Wang, Wendy |
author_facet | Ing, Edsel Zhang, Angela Michaelov, Evan Wang, Wendy |
author_sort | Ing, Edsel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact “air puff” Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with headache or vision loss. OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement between DCT and NCT. METHODS: The IOP of adult patients 50 years of age or older presenting with headache or vision loss for possible temporal artery biopsy were prospectively recorded. NCT and DCT measurements were obtained within thirty minutes. The right eye IOP measurements were compared with paired t-test, and Bland- Altman plot analysis. The left eye IOP measurements were subsequently analyzed for confirmation of results. RESULTS: There were 106 subjects with complete right eye data, and 104 subjects with complete left eye data. The average age was 72 years, and 70% were female. The NCT IOP was on average 3.9 mm Hg lower in the right eye, and 3.5 mm Hg lower in the left eye compared with DCT. (p<.001) In the right eye the Bland-Altman analysis showed the 95% agreement interval between the two tonometers was -2.5 to 10.4 mmHg and in the left eye -3.0 to 9.9 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The IOP from NCT and DCT should not be used interchangeably because their level of disagreement includes clinically important discrepancies of up to 10 mm Hg. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6018127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60181272018-07-13 Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss Ing, Edsel Zhang, Angela Michaelov, Evan Wang, Wendy Open Ophthalmol J Ophthalmology BACKGROUND: Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact “air puff” Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with headache or vision loss. OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement between DCT and NCT. METHODS: The IOP of adult patients 50 years of age or older presenting with headache or vision loss for possible temporal artery biopsy were prospectively recorded. NCT and DCT measurements were obtained within thirty minutes. The right eye IOP measurements were compared with paired t-test, and Bland- Altman plot analysis. The left eye IOP measurements were subsequently analyzed for confirmation of results. RESULTS: There were 106 subjects with complete right eye data, and 104 subjects with complete left eye data. The average age was 72 years, and 70% were female. The NCT IOP was on average 3.9 mm Hg lower in the right eye, and 3.5 mm Hg lower in the left eye compared with DCT. (p<.001) In the right eye the Bland-Altman analysis showed the 95% agreement interval between the two tonometers was -2.5 to 10.4 mmHg and in the left eye -3.0 to 9.9 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The IOP from NCT and DCT should not be used interchangeably because their level of disagreement includes clinically important discrepancies of up to 10 mm Hg. Bentham Open 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6018127/ /pubmed/30008972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010104 Text en © 2018 Ing et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Ophthalmology Ing, Edsel Zhang, Angela Michaelov, Evan Wang, Wendy Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss |
title | Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss |
title_full | Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss |
title_short | Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss |
title_sort | comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and non-contact tonometry in older patients presenting with headache or vision loss |
topic | Ophthalmology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ingedsel comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss AT zhangangela comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss AT michaelovevan comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss AT wangwendy comparisonofdynamiccontourtonometryandnoncontacttonometryinolderpatientspresentingwithheadacheorvisionloss |