Cargando…

Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the menstrual pattern, sexual function, and anxiety, and depression in women with poststerilization regret, and potential influencing factors for regret following tubal ligation (TL) in Iranian women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadatmahalleh, Shahideh Jahanian, Ziaei, Saeideh, Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan, Mohamadi, Eesa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royan Institute 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935064
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5272
_version_ 1783334900096565248
author Sadatmahalleh, Shahideh Jahanian
Ziaei, Saeideh
Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan
Mohamadi, Eesa
author_facet Sadatmahalleh, Shahideh Jahanian
Ziaei, Saeideh
Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan
Mohamadi, Eesa
author_sort Sadatmahalleh, Shahideh Jahanian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the menstrual pattern, sexual function, and anxiety, and depression in women with poststerilization regret, and potential influencing factors for regret following tubal ligation (TL) in Iranian women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 166 women with TL were subdivided into two groups including women with poststerilization regret (n=41) and women without poststerilization regret (n=125). They were selected from a health care center in Guilan province (Iran) during 2015-2016. Menstrual blood loss was measured using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC) and through a self-administered questionnaire. In addition, sexual function was assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and psychological distress was measured by employing the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Student’s t test and Chi-square test were used to reveal the statistical differences between the two groups. We used logistic regression to determine the influencing factors associated with regretting sterilization. RESULTS: Women with poststerilization regret had more menorrhagia (78 vs. 57.6%, P=0.03) than those who did not regret sterilization. A significant difference was found in sexual dysfunction in orgasm (P=0.02), satisfaction (P=0.004), pain (P=0.02), and total FSFI scores (P=0.007) between the two groups. Also, there was a significant difference between the two groups in anxiety, depression and total scores HADS (P=0.01). In the logistic regression model, age of sterilization [odds ratio (OR=2.67), confidence interval (CI): 1.03-7.81, P=0.04)], pre-sterilization counseling (OR=19.92, CI: 6.61-59.99, P<0.001), score of PBLAC (OR=1.01, CI: 1.004-1.01, P=0.001), the number of days of bleeding (OR=1.37, CI: 1.01-1.99, P=0.04), and the length of menstrual cycles (OR=0.91, CI: 0.84-0.99, P=0.03) were significantly associated with regretting sterilization. CONCLUSION: Complications due to sterilization are the main causes of regret; therefore, it is necessary to pay due attention to mentioning the probable complications of the procedures such as menstruation disorders, sexual dysfunction, and anxiety and depression in women during pre-sterilization counseling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6018183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royan Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60181832018-10-01 Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study Sadatmahalleh, Shahideh Jahanian Ziaei, Saeideh Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan Mohamadi, Eesa Int J Fertil Steril Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the menstrual pattern, sexual function, and anxiety, and depression in women with poststerilization regret, and potential influencing factors for regret following tubal ligation (TL) in Iranian women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 166 women with TL were subdivided into two groups including women with poststerilization regret (n=41) and women without poststerilization regret (n=125). They were selected from a health care center in Guilan province (Iran) during 2015-2016. Menstrual blood loss was measured using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC) and through a self-administered questionnaire. In addition, sexual function was assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and psychological distress was measured by employing the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Student’s t test and Chi-square test were used to reveal the statistical differences between the two groups. We used logistic regression to determine the influencing factors associated with regretting sterilization. RESULTS: Women with poststerilization regret had more menorrhagia (78 vs. 57.6%, P=0.03) than those who did not regret sterilization. A significant difference was found in sexual dysfunction in orgasm (P=0.02), satisfaction (P=0.004), pain (P=0.02), and total FSFI scores (P=0.007) between the two groups. Also, there was a significant difference between the two groups in anxiety, depression and total scores HADS (P=0.01). In the logistic regression model, age of sterilization [odds ratio (OR=2.67), confidence interval (CI): 1.03-7.81, P=0.04)], pre-sterilization counseling (OR=19.92, CI: 6.61-59.99, P<0.001), score of PBLAC (OR=1.01, CI: 1.004-1.01, P=0.001), the number of days of bleeding (OR=1.37, CI: 1.01-1.99, P=0.04), and the length of menstrual cycles (OR=0.91, CI: 0.84-0.99, P=0.03) were significantly associated with regretting sterilization. CONCLUSION: Complications due to sterilization are the main causes of regret; therefore, it is necessary to pay due attention to mentioning the probable complications of the procedures such as menstruation disorders, sexual dysfunction, and anxiety and depression in women during pre-sterilization counseling. Royan Institute 2018 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6018183/ /pubmed/29935064 http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5272 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadatmahalleh, Shahideh Jahanian
Ziaei, Saeideh
Kazemnejad, Anoshirvan
Mohamadi, Eesa
Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Evaluation of Influencing Factors on Tubal Sterilization Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort evaluation of influencing factors on tubal sterilization regret: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29935064
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5272
work_keys_str_mv AT sadatmahallehshahidehjahanian evaluationofinfluencingfactorsontubalsterilizationregretacrosssectionalstudy
AT ziaeisaeideh evaluationofinfluencingfactorsontubalsterilizationregretacrosssectionalstudy
AT kazemnejadanoshirvan evaluationofinfluencingfactorsontubalsterilizationregretacrosssectionalstudy
AT mohamadieesa evaluationofinfluencingfactorsontubalsterilizationregretacrosssectionalstudy