Cargando…

Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Two Underserved U.S. Populations: A Parallel Analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite declining colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates in the U.S., significant geographic and racial disparities in CRC death rates remain. Differences in guideline-concordant CRC screening rates may explain some of these disparities. We aim to assess individual and nei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernardo, Brittany M., Gross, Amy L., Young, Gregory, Baltic, Ryan, Reisinger, Sarah, Blot, William J., Paskett, Electra Diane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971216
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00230
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite declining colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates in the U.S., significant geographic and racial disparities in CRC death rates remain. Differences in guideline-concordant CRC screening rates may explain some of these disparities. We aim to assess individual and neighborhood-level predictors of guideline-concordant CRC screening within two cohorts of individuals located within CRC mortality geographic hotspot regions in the U.S. METHODS: A total of 36,901 participants from the Southern Community Cohort Study and 4,491 participants from the Ohio Appalachia CRC screening study were included in this study. Self-reported date of last CRC screening was used to determine if the participant was within guidelines for screening. Logistic regression models were utilized to determine the association of individual-level predictors, neighborhood deprivation, and residence in hotspot regions on the odds of being within guidelines for CRC screening. RESULTS: Lower household income, lack of health insurance, and being a smoker were each associated with lower odds of being within guidelines for CRC screening in both cohorts. Area-level associations were less evident, although up to 15% lower guideline adherence was associated with residence in neighborhoods of greater deprivation and in the Lower Mississippi Delta, one of the identified CRC mortality hotspots. CONCLUSION: These results reveal the adverse effects of lower area-level and individual socioeconomic status on adherence to CRC guideline screening.