Cargando…

Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion

OBJECTIVE: To correlate skeletal age, standing height, upper and lower body lengths, and selected craniofacial growth features in a sample of growing individuals, and to model craniofacial growth using multivariate regression. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study with 447 African...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Jewair, Thikriat S., Preston, Charles Brian, Flores-Mir, Carlos, Ziarnowski, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.037-045.oar
_version_ 1783334951211499520
author Al-Jewair, Thikriat S.
Preston, Charles Brian
Flores-Mir, Carlos
Ziarnowski, Paul
author_facet Al-Jewair, Thikriat S.
Preston, Charles Brian
Flores-Mir, Carlos
Ziarnowski, Paul
author_sort Al-Jewair, Thikriat S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To correlate skeletal age, standing height, upper and lower body lengths, and selected craniofacial growth features in a sample of growing individuals, and to model craniofacial growth using multivariate regression. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study with 447 African black boys and girls, between the ages 8 and 16 years, who attended the dental clinic at one hospital. The skeletal maturational age was determined from hand-wrist radiographs using the Greulich and Pyle atlas. Craniofacial measurements representing maxillary length (Ar-ANS), mandibular length (Ar-Gn), and lower facial height (ANS-Me) were calculated from lateral cephalograms in habitual occlusion. Body lengths were clinically measured in centimeters. RESULTS: Moderate correlations (r=0.42 to 0.68) were observed between skeletal age and the three selected craniofacial measurements. Statistically significant correlations were also found between the craniofacial measurements and both upper and lower body lengths. The mandibular length had a stronger correlation with the upper body length than with the lower body length. Multiple regression analyses to determine maxillary and mandibular lengths suggested that sex, upper and lower body lengths might be used to determine maxillary length; while skeletal age, upper and lower body lengths might help determine mandibular length. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the relatively strong correlation between upper body length and mandibular length, further research in this area may warrant its use as a predictor for mandibular growth modification timing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6018443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60184432018-06-27 Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion Al-Jewair, Thikriat S. Preston, Charles Brian Flores-Mir, Carlos Ziarnowski, Paul Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To correlate skeletal age, standing height, upper and lower body lengths, and selected craniofacial growth features in a sample of growing individuals, and to model craniofacial growth using multivariate regression. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study with 447 African black boys and girls, between the ages 8 and 16 years, who attended the dental clinic at one hospital. The skeletal maturational age was determined from hand-wrist radiographs using the Greulich and Pyle atlas. Craniofacial measurements representing maxillary length (Ar-ANS), mandibular length (Ar-Gn), and lower facial height (ANS-Me) were calculated from lateral cephalograms in habitual occlusion. Body lengths were clinically measured in centimeters. RESULTS: Moderate correlations (r=0.42 to 0.68) were observed between skeletal age and the three selected craniofacial measurements. Statistically significant correlations were also found between the craniofacial measurements and both upper and lower body lengths. The mandibular length had a stronger correlation with the upper body length than with the lower body length. Multiple regression analyses to determine maxillary and mandibular lengths suggested that sex, upper and lower body lengths might be used to determine maxillary length; while skeletal age, upper and lower body lengths might help determine mandibular length. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the relatively strong correlation between upper body length and mandibular length, further research in this area may warrant its use as a predictor for mandibular growth modification timing. Dental Press International 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6018443/ /pubmed/29898156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.037-045.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Al-Jewair, Thikriat S.
Preston, Charles Brian
Flores-Mir, Carlos
Ziarnowski, Paul
Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion
title Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion
title_full Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion
title_fullStr Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion
title_short Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with Class I occlusion
title_sort correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with class i occlusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29898156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.037-045.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT aljewairthikriats correlationbetweencraniofacialgrowthandupperandlowerbodyheightsinsubjectswithclassiocclusion
AT prestoncharlesbrian correlationbetweencraniofacialgrowthandupperandlowerbodyheightsinsubjectswithclassiocclusion
AT floresmircarlos correlationbetweencraniofacialgrowthandupperandlowerbodyheightsinsubjectswithclassiocclusion
AT ziarnowskipaul correlationbetweencraniofacialgrowthandupperandlowerbodyheightsinsubjectswithclassiocclusion