Cargando…

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32

PURPOSE: The EORTC IN-PATSAT32 is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess cancer patients’ satisfaction with in-patient health care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the initial good measurement properties of the IN-PATSAT32 are confirmed in new studies. METHODS: Within t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neijenhuijs, Koen I., Jansen, Femke, Aaronson, Neil K., Brédart, Anne, Groenvold, Mogens, Holzner, Bernhard, Terwee, Caroline B., Cuijpers, Pim, Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4243-9
_version_ 1783334980959600640
author Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
Jansen, Femke
Aaronson, Neil K.
Brédart, Anne
Groenvold, Mogens
Holzner, Bernhard
Terwee, Caroline B.
Cuijpers, Pim
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
author_facet Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
Jansen, Femke
Aaronson, Neil K.
Brédart, Anne
Groenvold, Mogens
Holzner, Bernhard
Terwee, Caroline B.
Cuijpers, Pim
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
author_sort Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The EORTC IN-PATSAT32 is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess cancer patients’ satisfaction with in-patient health care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the initial good measurement properties of the IN-PATSAT32 are confirmed in new studies. METHODS: Within the scope of a larger systematic review study (Prospero ID 42017057237), a systematic search was performed of Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies that investigated measurement properties of the IN-PATSAT32 up to July 2017. Study quality was assessed, data were extracted, and synthesized according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in this review. The evidence on reliability and construct validity were rated as sufficient and of the quality of the evidence as moderate. The evidence on structural validity was rated as insufficient and of low quality. The evidence on internal consistency was indeterminate. Measurement error, responsiveness, criterion validity, and cross-cultural validity were not reported in the included studies. Measurement error could be calculated for two studies and was judged indeterminate. CONCLUSION: In summary, the IN-PATSAT32 performs as expected with respect to reliability and construct validity. No firm conclusions can be made yet whether the IN-PATSAT32 also performs as well with respect to structural validity and internal consistency. Further research on these measurement properties of the PROM is therefore needed as well as on measurement error, responsiveness, criterion validity, and cross-cultural validity. For future studies, it is recommended to take the COSMIN methodology into account. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-018-4243-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6018571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60185712018-07-11 A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Neijenhuijs, Koen I. Jansen, Femke Aaronson, Neil K. Brédart, Anne Groenvold, Mogens Holzner, Bernhard Terwee, Caroline B. Cuijpers, Pim Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M. Support Care Cancer Review Article PURPOSE: The EORTC IN-PATSAT32 is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess cancer patients’ satisfaction with in-patient health care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the initial good measurement properties of the IN-PATSAT32 are confirmed in new studies. METHODS: Within the scope of a larger systematic review study (Prospero ID 42017057237), a systematic search was performed of Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies that investigated measurement properties of the IN-PATSAT32 up to July 2017. Study quality was assessed, data were extracted, and synthesized according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in this review. The evidence on reliability and construct validity were rated as sufficient and of the quality of the evidence as moderate. The evidence on structural validity was rated as insufficient and of low quality. The evidence on internal consistency was indeterminate. Measurement error, responsiveness, criterion validity, and cross-cultural validity were not reported in the included studies. Measurement error could be calculated for two studies and was judged indeterminate. CONCLUSION: In summary, the IN-PATSAT32 performs as expected with respect to reliability and construct validity. No firm conclusions can be made yet whether the IN-PATSAT32 also performs as well with respect to structural validity and internal consistency. Further research on these measurement properties of the PROM is therefore needed as well as on measurement error, responsiveness, criterion validity, and cross-cultural validity. For future studies, it is recommended to take the COSMIN methodology into account. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-018-4243-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6018571/ /pubmed/29732482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4243-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
Jansen, Femke
Aaronson, Neil K.
Brédart, Anne
Groenvold, Mogens
Holzner, Bernhard
Terwee, Caroline B.
Cuijpers, Pim
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
title A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
title_full A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
title_fullStr A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
title_short A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
title_sort systematic review of the measurement properties of the european organisation for research and treatment of cancer in-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire, the eortc in-patsat32
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4243-9
work_keys_str_mv AT neijenhuijskoeni asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT jansenfemke asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT aaronsonneilk asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT bredartanne asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT groenvoldmogens asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT holznerbernhard asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT terweecarolineb asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT cuijperspim asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT verdonckdeleeuwirmam asystematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT neijenhuijskoeni systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT jansenfemke systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT aaronsonneilk systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT bredartanne systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT groenvoldmogens systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT holznerbernhard systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT terweecarolineb systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT cuijperspim systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32
AT verdonckdeleeuwirmam systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesoftheeuropeanorganisationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerinpatientsatisfactionwithcarequestionnairetheeortcinpatsat32