Cargando…
The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery
BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the impact of boost dose escalation on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in breast cancer patients with involved resection margins following breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2010, 192 patients were treated with...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyy002 |
_version_ | 1783335050734993408 |
---|---|
author | Park, Sunmin Ahn, Seung Do Choi, Eun Kyung Kim, Su Ssan |
author_facet | Park, Sunmin Ahn, Seung Do Choi, Eun Kyung Kim, Su Ssan |
author_sort | Park, Sunmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the impact of boost dose escalation on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in breast cancer patients with involved resection margins following breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2010, 192 patients were treated with a boost dose of over 10 Gy for involved resection margins. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes in 192 patients who underwent whole breast irradiation of 50.4 Gy followed by a median boost dose of 15.0 Gy (range, 12–16 Gy). Boost doses of 12.5 Gy and 15 Gy were delivered to patients with carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma, respectively, at the positive margins. We evaluated the impact of the boost dose on the IBTR rate. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 6.7 years (0.4–15.6 years). The 5-year cumulative risk of IBTR as a first event was 5.0%. IBTR occurred as a first recurrence in 13 of 192 patients. In-boost-field recurrences were found in 11 patients (85%). Five patients (39%) experienced out-of boost field recurrences, and three experienced both types of recurrences. In multivariate analysis, age (<40 years), pT stage, and positive radial resection margin were prognostic factors for IBTR (P = 0.029, P = 0.024 and P = 0.035, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A median boost dose of 15 Gy might be insufficient in patients younger than 40 years, with tumor size greater than 2 cm, or with involved radial resection margins. On the other hand, in cases of positive superficial or deep margins, dose-escalated boost or re-excision may not be necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6018944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60189442018-07-10 The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery Park, Sunmin Ahn, Seung Do Choi, Eun Kyung Kim, Su Ssan Jpn J Clin Oncol Original article BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the impact of boost dose escalation on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in breast cancer patients with involved resection margins following breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2010, 192 patients were treated with a boost dose of over 10 Gy for involved resection margins. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes in 192 patients who underwent whole breast irradiation of 50.4 Gy followed by a median boost dose of 15.0 Gy (range, 12–16 Gy). Boost doses of 12.5 Gy and 15 Gy were delivered to patients with carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma, respectively, at the positive margins. We evaluated the impact of the boost dose on the IBTR rate. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 6.7 years (0.4–15.6 years). The 5-year cumulative risk of IBTR as a first event was 5.0%. IBTR occurred as a first recurrence in 13 of 192 patients. In-boost-field recurrences were found in 11 patients (85%). Five patients (39%) experienced out-of boost field recurrences, and three experienced both types of recurrences. In multivariate analysis, age (<40 years), pT stage, and positive radial resection margin were prognostic factors for IBTR (P = 0.029, P = 0.024 and P = 0.035, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A median boost dose of 15 Gy might be insufficient in patients younger than 40 years, with tumor size greater than 2 cm, or with involved radial resection margins. On the other hand, in cases of positive superficial or deep margins, dose-escalated boost or re-excision may not be necessary. Oxford University Press 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6018944/ /pubmed/29385496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyy002 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original article Park, Sunmin Ahn, Seung Do Choi, Eun Kyung Kim, Su Ssan The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery |
title | The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery |
title_full | The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery |
title_fullStr | The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery |
title_short | The effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery |
title_sort | effect of escalating the boost dose for patients with involved resection margin after breast-conserving surgery |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyy002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parksunmin theeffectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery AT ahnseungdo theeffectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery AT choieunkyung theeffectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery AT kimsussan theeffectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery AT parksunmin effectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery AT ahnseungdo effectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery AT choieunkyung effectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery AT kimsussan effectofescalatingtheboostdoseforpatientswithinvolvedresectionmarginafterbreastconservingsurgery |