Cargando…

“Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings

Office workers spend most of their working day sitting, and prolonged sitting has been associated with increased risk of poor health. Standing in meetings has been proposed as a strategy by which to reduce workplace sitting but little is known about the standing experience. This study documented wor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansfield, Louise, Hall, Jennifer, Smith, Lee, Rasch, Molly, Reeves, Emily, Dewitt, Stephen, Gardner, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29944662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198483
_version_ 1783335071808225280
author Mansfield, Louise
Hall, Jennifer
Smith, Lee
Rasch, Molly
Reeves, Emily
Dewitt, Stephen
Gardner, Benjamin
author_facet Mansfield, Louise
Hall, Jennifer
Smith, Lee
Rasch, Molly
Reeves, Emily
Dewitt, Stephen
Gardner, Benjamin
author_sort Mansfield, Louise
collection PubMed
description Office workers spend most of their working day sitting, and prolonged sitting has been associated with increased risk of poor health. Standing in meetings has been proposed as a strategy by which to reduce workplace sitting but little is known about the standing experience. This study documented workers’ experiences of standing in normally seated meetings. Twenty-five participants (18+ years), recruited from three UK universities, volunteered to stand in 3 separate, seated meetings that they were already scheduled to attend. They were instructed to stand when and for however long they deemed appropriate, and gave semi-structured interviews after each meeting. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis. Four themes, central to the experience of standing in meetings, were extracted: physical challenges to standing; implications of standing for meeting engagement; standing as norm violation; and standing as appropriation of power. Participants typically experienced some physical discomfort from prolonged standing, apparently due to choosing to stand for as long as possible, and noted practical difficulties of fully engaging in meetings while standing. Many participants experienced marked psychological discomfort due to concern at being seen to be violating a strong perceived sitting norm. While standing when leading the meeting was felt to confer a sense of power and control, when not leading the meeting participants felt uncomfortable at being misperceived to be challenging the authority of other attendees. These findings reveal important barriers to standing in normally-seated meetings, and suggest strategies for acclimatising to standing during meetings. Physical discomfort might be offset by building standing time slowly and incorporating more sit-stand transitions. Psychological discomfort may be lessened by notifying other attendees about intentions to stand. Organisational buy-in to promotional strategies for standing may be required to dispel perceptions of sitting norms, and to progress a wider workplace health and wellbeing agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60190912018-07-07 “Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings Mansfield, Louise Hall, Jennifer Smith, Lee Rasch, Molly Reeves, Emily Dewitt, Stephen Gardner, Benjamin PLoS One Research Article Office workers spend most of their working day sitting, and prolonged sitting has been associated with increased risk of poor health. Standing in meetings has been proposed as a strategy by which to reduce workplace sitting but little is known about the standing experience. This study documented workers’ experiences of standing in normally seated meetings. Twenty-five participants (18+ years), recruited from three UK universities, volunteered to stand in 3 separate, seated meetings that they were already scheduled to attend. They were instructed to stand when and for however long they deemed appropriate, and gave semi-structured interviews after each meeting. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis. Four themes, central to the experience of standing in meetings, were extracted: physical challenges to standing; implications of standing for meeting engagement; standing as norm violation; and standing as appropriation of power. Participants typically experienced some physical discomfort from prolonged standing, apparently due to choosing to stand for as long as possible, and noted practical difficulties of fully engaging in meetings while standing. Many participants experienced marked psychological discomfort due to concern at being seen to be violating a strong perceived sitting norm. While standing when leading the meeting was felt to confer a sense of power and control, when not leading the meeting participants felt uncomfortable at being misperceived to be challenging the authority of other attendees. These findings reveal important barriers to standing in normally-seated meetings, and suggest strategies for acclimatising to standing during meetings. Physical discomfort might be offset by building standing time slowly and incorporating more sit-stand transitions. Psychological discomfort may be lessened by notifying other attendees about intentions to stand. Organisational buy-in to promotional strategies for standing may be required to dispel perceptions of sitting norms, and to progress a wider workplace health and wellbeing agenda. Public Library of Science 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6019091/ /pubmed/29944662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198483 Text en © 2018 Mansfield et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mansfield, Louise
Hall, Jennifer
Smith, Lee
Rasch, Molly
Reeves, Emily
Dewitt, Stephen
Gardner, Benjamin
“Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
title “Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
title_full “Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
title_fullStr “Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
title_full_unstemmed “Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
title_short “Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
title_sort “could you sit down please?” a qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29944662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198483
work_keys_str_mv AT mansfieldlouise couldyousitdownpleaseaqualitativeanalysisofemployeesexperiencesofstandinginnormallyseatedworkplacemeetings
AT halljennifer couldyousitdownpleaseaqualitativeanalysisofemployeesexperiencesofstandinginnormallyseatedworkplacemeetings
AT smithlee couldyousitdownpleaseaqualitativeanalysisofemployeesexperiencesofstandinginnormallyseatedworkplacemeetings
AT raschmolly couldyousitdownpleaseaqualitativeanalysisofemployeesexperiencesofstandinginnormallyseatedworkplacemeetings
AT reevesemily couldyousitdownpleaseaqualitativeanalysisofemployeesexperiencesofstandinginnormallyseatedworkplacemeetings
AT dewittstephen couldyousitdownpleaseaqualitativeanalysisofemployeesexperiencesofstandinginnormallyseatedworkplacemeetings
AT gardnerbenjamin couldyousitdownpleaseaqualitativeanalysisofemployeesexperiencesofstandinginnormallyseatedworkplacemeetings