Cargando…

Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the levels of agreement between self-reported responses to the Adult Pre-exercise Screening System (APSS) questionnaire using online versus face-to-face (F2F) modalities. DESIGN: Convenience sample of adults completing a pre-exercise screening questionnaire using different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norton, Lynda, Thomas, Jessica, Bevan, Nadia, Norton, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29944718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199836
_version_ 1783335112391262208
author Norton, Lynda
Thomas, Jessica
Bevan, Nadia
Norton, Kevin
author_facet Norton, Lynda
Thomas, Jessica
Bevan, Nadia
Norton, Kevin
author_sort Norton, Lynda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the levels of agreement between self-reported responses to the Adult Pre-exercise Screening System (APSS) questionnaire using online versus face-to-face (F2F) modalities. DESIGN: Convenience sample of adults completing a pre-exercise screening questionnaire using different modalities. METHODS: Adult volunteers (n = 94) were recruited to complete the APSS using both online and F2F modalities. Participants were provided a URL link to an online APSS questionnaire then followed-up the next day in a F2F interview. Objective health risk factors were also measured. Comparisons between responses were undertaken using kappa and correlation statistics to determine levels of agreement. RESULTS: The levels of agreement between online versus F2F responses for the seven compulsory Stage 1 questions (known diseases and signs and/or symptoms of disease) were >94% (kappa = 0.644–0.794). Response comparisons for Stage 2 questions on health risk factors were also generally high (>82% agreement) but there were larger differences between reported and measured risk factors in Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of agreement between the Stage 1 responses were substantial and support the use of this online option for pre-exercise screening. There were larger differences between self-reported and objectively measured health risk factors in Stages 2 and 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60193962018-07-07 Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face Norton, Lynda Thomas, Jessica Bevan, Nadia Norton, Kevin PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the levels of agreement between self-reported responses to the Adult Pre-exercise Screening System (APSS) questionnaire using online versus face-to-face (F2F) modalities. DESIGN: Convenience sample of adults completing a pre-exercise screening questionnaire using different modalities. METHODS: Adult volunteers (n = 94) were recruited to complete the APSS using both online and F2F modalities. Participants were provided a URL link to an online APSS questionnaire then followed-up the next day in a F2F interview. Objective health risk factors were also measured. Comparisons between responses were undertaken using kappa and correlation statistics to determine levels of agreement. RESULTS: The levels of agreement between online versus F2F responses for the seven compulsory Stage 1 questions (known diseases and signs and/or symptoms of disease) were >94% (kappa = 0.644–0.794). Response comparisons for Stage 2 questions on health risk factors were also generally high (>82% agreement) but there were larger differences between reported and measured risk factors in Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of agreement between the Stage 1 responses were substantial and support the use of this online option for pre-exercise screening. There were larger differences between self-reported and objectively measured health risk factors in Stages 2 and 3. Public Library of Science 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6019396/ /pubmed/29944718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199836 Text en © 2018 Norton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Norton, Lynda
Thomas, Jessica
Bevan, Nadia
Norton, Kevin
Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face
title Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face
title_full Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face
title_fullStr Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face
title_full_unstemmed Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face
title_short Agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face
title_sort agreement between pre-exercise screening questionnaires completed online versus face-to-face
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29944718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199836
work_keys_str_mv AT nortonlynda agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface
AT thomasjessica agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface
AT bevannadia agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface
AT nortonkevin agreementbetweenpreexercisescreeningquestionnairescompletedonlineversusfacetoface