Cargando…
Individual differences in face identity processing
We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing, using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9 |
_version_ | 1783335118068252672 |
---|---|
author | McCaffery, Jennifer M. Robertson, David J. Young, Andrew W. Burton, A. Mike |
author_facet | McCaffery, Jennifer M. Robertson, David J. Young, Andrew W. Burton, A. Mike |
author_sort | McCaffery, Jennifer M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing, using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as a measure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining the relationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’ subjective ratings of their own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities, and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context. Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting some degree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’ self-ratings correlated poorly with performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there were few associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for the small number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show an overall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existence of a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25% of the variance in scores. However, other relatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6019420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60194202018-07-11 Individual differences in face identity processing McCaffery, Jennifer M. Robertson, David J. Young, Andrew W. Burton, A. Mike Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing, using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as a measure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining the relationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’ subjective ratings of their own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities, and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context. Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting some degree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’ self-ratings correlated poorly with performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there were few associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for the small number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show an overall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existence of a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25% of the variance in scores. However, other relatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6019420/ /pubmed/30009251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article McCaffery, Jennifer M. Robertson, David J. Young, Andrew W. Burton, A. Mike Individual differences in face identity processing |
title | Individual differences in face identity processing |
title_full | Individual differences in face identity processing |
title_fullStr | Individual differences in face identity processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual differences in face identity processing |
title_short | Individual differences in face identity processing |
title_sort | individual differences in face identity processing |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccafferyjenniferm individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing AT robertsondavidj individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing AT youngandreww individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing AT burtonamike individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing |