Cargando…

Individual differences in face identity processing

We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing, using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCaffery, Jennifer M., Robertson, David J., Young, Andrew W., Burton, A. Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9
_version_ 1783335118068252672
author McCaffery, Jennifer M.
Robertson, David J.
Young, Andrew W.
Burton, A. Mike
author_facet McCaffery, Jennifer M.
Robertson, David J.
Young, Andrew W.
Burton, A. Mike
author_sort McCaffery, Jennifer M.
collection PubMed
description We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing, using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as a measure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining the relationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’ subjective ratings of their own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities, and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context. Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting some degree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’ self-ratings correlated poorly with performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there were few associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for the small number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show an overall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existence of a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25% of the variance in scores. However, other relatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60194202018-07-11 Individual differences in face identity processing McCaffery, Jennifer M. Robertson, David J. Young, Andrew W. Burton, A. Mike Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article We investigated the relationships between individual differences in different aspects of face-identity processing, using the Glasgow Face Matching Test (GFMT) as a measure of unfamiliar face perception, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) as a measure of new face learning, and the Before They Were Famous task (BTWF) as a measure of familiar face recognition. These measures were integrated into two separate studies examining the relationship between face processing and other tasks. For Study 1 we gathered participants’ subjective ratings of their own face perception abilities. In Study 2 we used additional measures of perceptual and cognitive abilities, and personality factors to place individual differences in a broader context. Performance was significantly correlated across the three face-identity tasks in both studies, suggesting some degree of commonality of underlying mechanisms. For Study 1 the participants’ self-ratings correlated poorly with performance, reaching significance only for judgements of familiar face recognition. In Study 2 there were few associations between face tasks and other measures, with task-level influences seeming to account for the small number of associations present. In general, face tasks correlated with each other, but did not show an overall relation with other perceptual, cognitive or personality tests. Our findings are consistent with the existence of a general face-perception factor, able to account for around 25% of the variance in scores. However, other relatively task-specific influences are also clearly operating. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6019420/ /pubmed/30009251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
McCaffery, Jennifer M.
Robertson, David J.
Young, Andrew W.
Burton, A. Mike
Individual differences in face identity processing
title Individual differences in face identity processing
title_full Individual differences in face identity processing
title_fullStr Individual differences in face identity processing
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in face identity processing
title_short Individual differences in face identity processing
title_sort individual differences in face identity processing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0112-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mccafferyjenniferm individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing
AT robertsondavidj individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing
AT youngandreww individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing
AT burtonamike individualdifferencesinfaceidentityprocessing