Cargando…
The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
BACKGROUND: Computerised decision support (CDS) based on trustworthy clinical guidelines is a key component of a learning healthcare system. Research shows that the effectiveness of CDS is mixed. Multifaceted context, system, recommendation and implementation factors may potentially affect the succe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3 |
_version_ | 1783335138845786112 |
---|---|
author | Van de Velde, Stijn Kunnamo, Ilkka Roshanov, Pavel Kortteisto, Tiina Aertgeerts, Bert Vandvik, Per Olav Flottorp, Signe |
author_facet | Van de Velde, Stijn Kunnamo, Ilkka Roshanov, Pavel Kortteisto, Tiina Aertgeerts, Bert Vandvik, Per Olav Flottorp, Signe |
author_sort | Van de Velde, Stijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerised decision support (CDS) based on trustworthy clinical guidelines is a key component of a learning healthcare system. Research shows that the effectiveness of CDS is mixed. Multifaceted context, system, recommendation and implementation factors may potentially affect the success of CDS interventions. This paper describes the development of a checklist that is intended to support professionals to implement CDS successfully. METHODS: We developed the checklist through an iterative process that involved a systematic review of evidence and frameworks, a synthesis of the success factors identified in the review, feedback from an international expert panel that evaluated the checklist in relation to a list of desirable framework attributes, consultations with patients and healthcare consumers and pilot testing of the checklist. RESULTS: We screened 5347 papers and selected 71 papers with relevant information on success factors for guideline-based CDS. From the selected papers, we developed a 16-factor checklist that is divided in four domains, i.e. the CDS context, content, system and implementation domains. The panel of experts evaluated the checklist positively as an instrument that could support people implementing guideline-based CDS across a wide range of settings globally. Patients and healthcare consumers identified guideline-based CDS as an important quality improvement intervention and perceived the GUIDES checklist as a suitable and useful strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The GUIDES checklist can support professionals in considering the factors that affect the success of CDS interventions. It may facilitate a deeper and more accurate understanding of the factors shaping CDS effectiveness. Relying on a structured approach may prevent that important factors are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6019508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60195082018-07-06 The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support Van de Velde, Stijn Kunnamo, Ilkka Roshanov, Pavel Kortteisto, Tiina Aertgeerts, Bert Vandvik, Per Olav Flottorp, Signe Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Computerised decision support (CDS) based on trustworthy clinical guidelines is a key component of a learning healthcare system. Research shows that the effectiveness of CDS is mixed. Multifaceted context, system, recommendation and implementation factors may potentially affect the success of CDS interventions. This paper describes the development of a checklist that is intended to support professionals to implement CDS successfully. METHODS: We developed the checklist through an iterative process that involved a systematic review of evidence and frameworks, a synthesis of the success factors identified in the review, feedback from an international expert panel that evaluated the checklist in relation to a list of desirable framework attributes, consultations with patients and healthcare consumers and pilot testing of the checklist. RESULTS: We screened 5347 papers and selected 71 papers with relevant information on success factors for guideline-based CDS. From the selected papers, we developed a 16-factor checklist that is divided in four domains, i.e. the CDS context, content, system and implementation domains. The panel of experts evaluated the checklist positively as an instrument that could support people implementing guideline-based CDS across a wide range of settings globally. Patients and healthcare consumers identified guideline-based CDS as an important quality improvement intervention and perceived the GUIDES checklist as a suitable and useful strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The GUIDES checklist can support professionals in considering the factors that affect the success of CDS interventions. It may facilitate a deeper and more accurate understanding of the factors shaping CDS effectiveness. Relying on a structured approach may prevent that important factors are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6019508/ /pubmed/29941007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Van de Velde, Stijn Kunnamo, Ilkka Roshanov, Pavel Kortteisto, Tiina Aertgeerts, Bert Vandvik, Per Olav Flottorp, Signe The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support |
title | The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support |
title_full | The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support |
title_fullStr | The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support |
title_full_unstemmed | The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support |
title_short | The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support |
title_sort | guides checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandeveldestijn theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT kunnamoilkka theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT roshanovpavel theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT kortteistotiina theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT aertgeertsbert theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT vandvikperolav theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT flottorpsigne theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT vandeveldestijn guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT kunnamoilkka guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT roshanovpavel guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT kortteistotiina guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT aertgeertsbert guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT vandvikperolav guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT flottorpsigne guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport AT guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport |