Cargando…

The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support

BACKGROUND: Computerised decision support (CDS) based on trustworthy clinical guidelines is a key component of a learning healthcare system. Research shows that the effectiveness of CDS is mixed. Multifaceted context, system, recommendation and implementation factors may potentially affect the succe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van de Velde, Stijn, Kunnamo, Ilkka, Roshanov, Pavel, Kortteisto, Tiina, Aertgeerts, Bert, Vandvik, Per Olav, Flottorp, Signe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3
_version_ 1783335138845786112
author Van de Velde, Stijn
Kunnamo, Ilkka
Roshanov, Pavel
Kortteisto, Tiina
Aertgeerts, Bert
Vandvik, Per Olav
Flottorp, Signe
author_facet Van de Velde, Stijn
Kunnamo, Ilkka
Roshanov, Pavel
Kortteisto, Tiina
Aertgeerts, Bert
Vandvik, Per Olav
Flottorp, Signe
author_sort Van de Velde, Stijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computerised decision support (CDS) based on trustworthy clinical guidelines is a key component of a learning healthcare system. Research shows that the effectiveness of CDS is mixed. Multifaceted context, system, recommendation and implementation factors may potentially affect the success of CDS interventions. This paper describes the development of a checklist that is intended to support professionals to implement CDS successfully. METHODS: We developed the checklist through an iterative process that involved a systematic review of evidence and frameworks, a synthesis of the success factors identified in the review, feedback from an international expert panel that evaluated the checklist in relation to a list of desirable framework attributes, consultations with patients and healthcare consumers and pilot testing of the checklist. RESULTS: We screened 5347 papers and selected 71 papers with relevant information on success factors for guideline-based CDS. From the selected papers, we developed a 16-factor checklist that is divided in four domains, i.e. the CDS context, content, system and implementation domains. The panel of experts evaluated the checklist positively as an instrument that could support people implementing guideline-based CDS across a wide range of settings globally. Patients and healthcare consumers identified guideline-based CDS as an important quality improvement intervention and perceived the GUIDES checklist as a suitable and useful strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The GUIDES checklist can support professionals in considering the factors that affect the success of CDS interventions. It may facilitate a deeper and more accurate understanding of the factors shaping CDS effectiveness. Relying on a structured approach may prevent that important factors are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60195082018-07-06 The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support Van de Velde, Stijn Kunnamo, Ilkka Roshanov, Pavel Kortteisto, Tiina Aertgeerts, Bert Vandvik, Per Olav Flottorp, Signe Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Computerised decision support (CDS) based on trustworthy clinical guidelines is a key component of a learning healthcare system. Research shows that the effectiveness of CDS is mixed. Multifaceted context, system, recommendation and implementation factors may potentially affect the success of CDS interventions. This paper describes the development of a checklist that is intended to support professionals to implement CDS successfully. METHODS: We developed the checklist through an iterative process that involved a systematic review of evidence and frameworks, a synthesis of the success factors identified in the review, feedback from an international expert panel that evaluated the checklist in relation to a list of desirable framework attributes, consultations with patients and healthcare consumers and pilot testing of the checklist. RESULTS: We screened 5347 papers and selected 71 papers with relevant information on success factors for guideline-based CDS. From the selected papers, we developed a 16-factor checklist that is divided in four domains, i.e. the CDS context, content, system and implementation domains. The panel of experts evaluated the checklist positively as an instrument that could support people implementing guideline-based CDS across a wide range of settings globally. Patients and healthcare consumers identified guideline-based CDS as an important quality improvement intervention and perceived the GUIDES checklist as a suitable and useful strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The GUIDES checklist can support professionals in considering the factors that affect the success of CDS interventions. It may facilitate a deeper and more accurate understanding of the factors shaping CDS effectiveness. Relying on a structured approach may prevent that important factors are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6019508/ /pubmed/29941007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Van de Velde, Stijn
Kunnamo, Ilkka
Roshanov, Pavel
Kortteisto, Tiina
Aertgeerts, Bert
Vandvik, Per Olav
Flottorp, Signe
The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
title The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
title_full The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
title_fullStr The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
title_full_unstemmed The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
title_short The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
title_sort guides checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeveldestijn theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT kunnamoilkka theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT roshanovpavel theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT kortteistotiina theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT aertgeertsbert theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT vandvikperolav theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT flottorpsigne theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT theguideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT vandeveldestijn guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT kunnamoilkka guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT roshanovpavel guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT kortteistotiina guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT aertgeertsbert guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT vandvikperolav guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT flottorpsigne guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT guideschecklistdevelopmentofatooltoimprovethesuccessfuluseofguidelinebasedcomputerisedclinicaldecisionsupport