Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters

AIMS: To determine the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for glaucoma detection in a Chinese population in comparison with optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koh, Victor, Tham, Yih-Chung, Cheung, Carol Y., Mani, Baskaran, Wong, Tien Yin, Aung, Tin, Cheng, Ching-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29944673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199134
_version_ 1783335177197453312
author Koh, Victor
Tham, Yih-Chung
Cheung, Carol Y.
Mani, Baskaran
Wong, Tien Yin
Aung, Tin
Cheng, Ching-Yu
author_facet Koh, Victor
Tham, Yih-Chung
Cheung, Carol Y.
Mani, Baskaran
Wong, Tien Yin
Aung, Tin
Cheng, Ching-Yu
author_sort Koh, Victor
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for glaucoma detection in a Chinese population in comparison with optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters measured by both SD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomography 3 (HRT-3). METHODS: Adults aged 40 to 80 years were recruited from the population-based study (n = 3353, response rate 72.8%). Macular cube 200x200 scan was performed with Cirrus SD-OCT (version 6.0, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA) for GCIPL thickness measurement. ONH and RNFL imaging was performed with Cirrus SD-OCT and HRT-3 (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Glaucoma was defined according to International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria. RESULTS: In total, 86 eyes of 60 subjects with glaucoma and 1709 eyes of 1001 non-glaucoma participants were included. The best performing parameters for Cirrus SD-OCT GCIPL, Cirrus SD-OCT ONH and HRT-3 were minimum GCIPL thickness (Area under receiver-operating curve [AUC] = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83–0.95), vertical cup-disc ratio (CDR) (AUC = 0.94, 0.91–0.98) and vertical CDR (AUC = 0.86, 0.81–0.92), respectively. At 85% specificity, vertical CDR measured using Cirrus OCT ONH scan showed the highest sensitivity (88.64%, 95% CI 75.4–96.2) compared to minimum GCIPL thickness with sensitivity of 60.53% (95% CI 46.4–73.0) (p<0.001). Inferior RNFL thickness (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI 0.91–0.97) measured by Cirrus SD-OCT was also superior to Cirrus SD-OCT GCIPL (p<0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of macular GCIPL scan is inferior compared to vertical CDR measured by Cirrus OCT ONH scan. Cirrus OCT ONH scan showed the best ability in detecting glaucoma in a Chinese population, suggesting it could be a good glaucoma screening tool in an Asian population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60197512018-07-07 Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters Koh, Victor Tham, Yih-Chung Cheung, Carol Y. Mani, Baskaran Wong, Tien Yin Aung, Tin Cheng, Ching-Yu PLoS One Research Article AIMS: To determine the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for glaucoma detection in a Chinese population in comparison with optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters measured by both SD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomography 3 (HRT-3). METHODS: Adults aged 40 to 80 years were recruited from the population-based study (n = 3353, response rate 72.8%). Macular cube 200x200 scan was performed with Cirrus SD-OCT (version 6.0, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA) for GCIPL thickness measurement. ONH and RNFL imaging was performed with Cirrus SD-OCT and HRT-3 (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Glaucoma was defined according to International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria. RESULTS: In total, 86 eyes of 60 subjects with glaucoma and 1709 eyes of 1001 non-glaucoma participants were included. The best performing parameters for Cirrus SD-OCT GCIPL, Cirrus SD-OCT ONH and HRT-3 were minimum GCIPL thickness (Area under receiver-operating curve [AUC] = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83–0.95), vertical cup-disc ratio (CDR) (AUC = 0.94, 0.91–0.98) and vertical CDR (AUC = 0.86, 0.81–0.92), respectively. At 85% specificity, vertical CDR measured using Cirrus OCT ONH scan showed the highest sensitivity (88.64%, 95% CI 75.4–96.2) compared to minimum GCIPL thickness with sensitivity of 60.53% (95% CI 46.4–73.0) (p<0.001). Inferior RNFL thickness (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI 0.91–0.97) measured by Cirrus SD-OCT was also superior to Cirrus SD-OCT GCIPL (p<0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of macular GCIPL scan is inferior compared to vertical CDR measured by Cirrus OCT ONH scan. Cirrus OCT ONH scan showed the best ability in detecting glaucoma in a Chinese population, suggesting it could be a good glaucoma screening tool in an Asian population. Public Library of Science 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6019751/ /pubmed/29944673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199134 Text en © 2018 Koh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koh, Victor
Tham, Yih-Chung
Cheung, Carol Y.
Mani, Baskaran
Wong, Tien Yin
Aung, Tin
Cheng, Ching-Yu
Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters
title Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: Comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness for glaucoma detection in a population-based study: comparison with optic nerve head imaging parameters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29944673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199134
work_keys_str_mv AT kohvictor diagnosticaccuracyofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessforglaucomadetectioninapopulationbasedstudycomparisonwithopticnerveheadimagingparameters
AT thamyihchung diagnosticaccuracyofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessforglaucomadetectioninapopulationbasedstudycomparisonwithopticnerveheadimagingparameters
AT cheungcaroly diagnosticaccuracyofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessforglaucomadetectioninapopulationbasedstudycomparisonwithopticnerveheadimagingparameters
AT manibaskaran diagnosticaccuracyofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessforglaucomadetectioninapopulationbasedstudycomparisonwithopticnerveheadimagingparameters
AT wongtienyin diagnosticaccuracyofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessforglaucomadetectioninapopulationbasedstudycomparisonwithopticnerveheadimagingparameters
AT aungtin diagnosticaccuracyofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessforglaucomadetectioninapopulationbasedstudycomparisonwithopticnerveheadimagingparameters
AT chengchingyu diagnosticaccuracyofmacularganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessforglaucomadetectioninapopulationbasedstudycomparisonwithopticnerveheadimagingparameters