Cargando…
Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a substantial health problem with a prevalence of approximately 8% in community-dwelling populations. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is considered the first-line surgical treatment option in adults with FI in whom conservative therapies have failed. The clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2689-1 |
_version_ | 1783335181414825984 |
---|---|
author | McAlees, Eleanor Vollebregt, Paul F. Stevens, Natasha Dudding, Tom C. Emmanuel, Anton V. Furlong, Paul L. Hamdy, Shaheen Hooper, Richard L. Jones, James F. X. Norton, Christine O’Connell, P. Ronan Scott, S. Mark Knowles, Charles H. |
author_facet | McAlees, Eleanor Vollebregt, Paul F. Stevens, Natasha Dudding, Tom C. Emmanuel, Anton V. Furlong, Paul L. Hamdy, Shaheen Hooper, Richard L. Jones, James F. X. Norton, Christine O’Connell, P. Ronan Scott, S. Mark Knowles, Charles H. |
author_sort | McAlees, Eleanor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a substantial health problem with a prevalence of approximately 8% in community-dwelling populations. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is considered the first-line surgical treatment option in adults with FI in whom conservative therapies have failed. The clinical efficacy of SNM has never been rigorously determined in a trial setting and the underlying mechanism of action remains unclear. METHODS/DESIGN: The design encompasses a multicentre, randomised, double-blind crossover trial and cohort follow-up study. Ninety participants will be randomised to one of two groups (SNM/SHAM or SHAM/SNM) in an allocation ratio of 1:1. The main inclusion criteria will be adults aged 18–75 years meeting Rome III and ICI definitions of FI, who have failed non-surgical treatments to the UK standard, who have a minimum of eight FI episodes in a 4-week screening period, and who are clinically suitable for SNM. The primary objective is to estimate the clinical efficacy of sub-sensory SNM vs. SHAM at 32 weeks based on the primary outcome of frequency of FI episodes using a 4-week paper diary, using mixed Poisson regression analysis on the intention-to-treat principle. The study is powered (0.9) to detect a 30% reduction in frequency of FI episodes between sub-sensory SNM and SHAM stimulation over a 32-week crossover period. Secondary objectives include: measurement of established and new clinical outcomes after 1 year of therapy using new (2017 published) optimised therapy (with standardised SNM-lead placement); validation of new electronic outcome measures (events) and a device to record them, and identification of potential biological effects of SNM on underlying anorectal afferent neuronal pathophysiology (hypothesis: SNM leads to increased frequency of perceived transient anal sphincter relaxations; improved conscious sensation of defaecatory urge and cortical/subcortical changes in afferent responses to anorectal electrical stimulation (main techniques: high-resolution anorectal manometry and magnetoencephalography). DISCUSSION: This trial will determine clinical effect size for sub-sensory chronic electrical stimulation of the sacral innervation. It will provide experimental evidence of modifiable afferent neurophysiology that may aid future patient selection as well as a basic understanding of the pathophysiology of FI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN98760715. Registered on 15 September 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2689-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6019783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60197832018-07-06 Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial McAlees, Eleanor Vollebregt, Paul F. Stevens, Natasha Dudding, Tom C. Emmanuel, Anton V. Furlong, Paul L. Hamdy, Shaheen Hooper, Richard L. Jones, James F. X. Norton, Christine O’Connell, P. Ronan Scott, S. Mark Knowles, Charles H. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a substantial health problem with a prevalence of approximately 8% in community-dwelling populations. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is considered the first-line surgical treatment option in adults with FI in whom conservative therapies have failed. The clinical efficacy of SNM has never been rigorously determined in a trial setting and the underlying mechanism of action remains unclear. METHODS/DESIGN: The design encompasses a multicentre, randomised, double-blind crossover trial and cohort follow-up study. Ninety participants will be randomised to one of two groups (SNM/SHAM or SHAM/SNM) in an allocation ratio of 1:1. The main inclusion criteria will be adults aged 18–75 years meeting Rome III and ICI definitions of FI, who have failed non-surgical treatments to the UK standard, who have a minimum of eight FI episodes in a 4-week screening period, and who are clinically suitable for SNM. The primary objective is to estimate the clinical efficacy of sub-sensory SNM vs. SHAM at 32 weeks based on the primary outcome of frequency of FI episodes using a 4-week paper diary, using mixed Poisson regression analysis on the intention-to-treat principle. The study is powered (0.9) to detect a 30% reduction in frequency of FI episodes between sub-sensory SNM and SHAM stimulation over a 32-week crossover period. Secondary objectives include: measurement of established and new clinical outcomes after 1 year of therapy using new (2017 published) optimised therapy (with standardised SNM-lead placement); validation of new electronic outcome measures (events) and a device to record them, and identification of potential biological effects of SNM on underlying anorectal afferent neuronal pathophysiology (hypothesis: SNM leads to increased frequency of perceived transient anal sphincter relaxations; improved conscious sensation of defaecatory urge and cortical/subcortical changes in afferent responses to anorectal electrical stimulation (main techniques: high-resolution anorectal manometry and magnetoencephalography). DISCUSSION: This trial will determine clinical effect size for sub-sensory chronic electrical stimulation of the sacral innervation. It will provide experimental evidence of modifiable afferent neurophysiology that may aid future patient selection as well as a basic understanding of the pathophysiology of FI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN98760715. Registered on 15 September 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2689-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6019783/ /pubmed/29941019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2689-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol McAlees, Eleanor Vollebregt, Paul F. Stevens, Natasha Dudding, Tom C. Emmanuel, Anton V. Furlong, Paul L. Hamdy, Shaheen Hooper, Richard L. Jones, James F. X. Norton, Christine O’Connell, P. Ronan Scott, S. Mark Knowles, Charles H. Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2689-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcaleeseleanor efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vollebregtpaulf efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stevensnatasha efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT duddingtomc efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT emmanuelantonv efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT furlongpaull efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hamdyshaheen efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hooperrichardl efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jonesjamesfx efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nortonchristine efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT oconnellpronan efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT scottsmark efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT knowlescharlesh efficacyandmechanismofsubsensorysacraloptimisedneuromodulationinadultswithfaecalincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |