Cargando…

Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial

BACKGROUND: Patients can struggle to make sense of trials in emergency situations. This study examines patient experience of participating in the United Kingdom, Wound management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (UK WOLLF) study, a trial of standard wound management versus Negative Pressure Wound Therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tutton, Elizabeth, Achten, Juul, Lamb, Sarah E., Willett, Keith, Costa, Matthew L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2722-4
_version_ 1783335181892976640
author Tutton, Elizabeth
Achten, Juul
Lamb, Sarah E.
Willett, Keith
Costa, Matthew L.
author_facet Tutton, Elizabeth
Achten, Juul
Lamb, Sarah E.
Willett, Keith
Costa, Matthew L.
author_sort Tutton, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients can struggle to make sense of trials in emergency situations. This study examines patient experience of participating in the United Kingdom, Wound management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (UK WOLLF) study, a trial of standard wound management versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). METHODS: The aim of the study was to understand the patient’s lived experience of taking part in a trial of wound dressings. Interviews drawing on Phenomenology were undertaken with a purposive sample of 20 patients, on average 12 days into their hospital stay from July 2012–July 2013. RESULTS: The participants were vulnerable due to the emotional and physical impact of injury. They expressed their trial experience through the theme of being compromised identified in categories of being dependent, being trusting, being grateful and being without experience. Participants felt dependent on and trusted the team to make the right decisions for them and not cause them harm. Their hopes for future recovery were also invested within the expertise of the team. Despite often not being well enough to consent to the study prior to surgery, they wished to be involved as much as possible. In agreeing to take part they expressed gratitude for their care, wanted to be helpful to others and considered the trial interventions to be a small component in relation to the enormity of their injury and broader treatment. In making sense of the trial they felt they could not understand the interventions without experience of them but if they received NPWT they developed a strong technological preference for this intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prefer to be involved in studies within the limits of their capacity, despite not being able to provide informed consent. A variety of sources of knowledge may enable participants to feel that they have a better understanding of the interventions. Professional staff need to be aware of the situated nature of decision making where participants invest their hopes for recovery in the team. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN33756652. Registered on 24 February 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60197852018-07-06 Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial Tutton, Elizabeth Achten, Juul Lamb, Sarah E. Willett, Keith Costa, Matthew L. Trials Research BACKGROUND: Patients can struggle to make sense of trials in emergency situations. This study examines patient experience of participating in the United Kingdom, Wound management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (UK WOLLF) study, a trial of standard wound management versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). METHODS: The aim of the study was to understand the patient’s lived experience of taking part in a trial of wound dressings. Interviews drawing on Phenomenology were undertaken with a purposive sample of 20 patients, on average 12 days into their hospital stay from July 2012–July 2013. RESULTS: The participants were vulnerable due to the emotional and physical impact of injury. They expressed their trial experience through the theme of being compromised identified in categories of being dependent, being trusting, being grateful and being without experience. Participants felt dependent on and trusted the team to make the right decisions for them and not cause them harm. Their hopes for future recovery were also invested within the expertise of the team. Despite often not being well enough to consent to the study prior to surgery, they wished to be involved as much as possible. In agreeing to take part they expressed gratitude for their care, wanted to be helpful to others and considered the trial interventions to be a small component in relation to the enormity of their injury and broader treatment. In making sense of the trial they felt they could not understand the interventions without experience of them but if they received NPWT they developed a strong technological preference for this intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prefer to be involved in studies within the limits of their capacity, despite not being able to provide informed consent. A variety of sources of knowledge may enable participants to feel that they have a better understanding of the interventions. Professional staff need to be aware of the situated nature of decision making where participants invest their hopes for recovery in the team. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN33756652. Registered on 24 February 2012. BioMed Central 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6019785/ /pubmed/29941030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2722-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tutton, Elizabeth
Achten, Juul
Lamb, Sarah E.
Willett, Keith
Costa, Matthew L.
Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial
title Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial
title_full Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial
title_fullStr Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial
title_full_unstemmed Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial
title_short Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial
title_sort participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the uk wollf trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29941030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2722-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tuttonelizabeth participationinatrialintheemergencysituationaqualitativestudyofpatientexperienceintheukwollftrial
AT achtenjuul participationinatrialintheemergencysituationaqualitativestudyofpatientexperienceintheukwollftrial
AT lambsarahe participationinatrialintheemergencysituationaqualitativestudyofpatientexperienceintheukwollftrial
AT willettkeith participationinatrialintheemergencysituationaqualitativestudyofpatientexperienceintheukwollftrial
AT costamatthewl participationinatrialintheemergencysituationaqualitativestudyofpatientexperienceintheukwollftrial
AT participationinatrialintheemergencysituationaqualitativestudyofpatientexperienceintheukwollftrial