Cargando…

Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools

BACKGROUND: The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) assesses what change on a measurement tool can be considered minimal clinically relevant. Although the recall period can influence questionnaire scores, it is unclear if it influences the MCID. This study is the first to examine longitud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alma, H. J., de Jong, C., Jelusic, D., Wittmann, M., Schuler, M., Kollen, B. J., Sanderman, R., Schultz, K., Kocks, J. W. H., Van der Molen, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7
_version_ 1783335193324552192
author Alma, H. J.
de Jong, C.
Jelusic, D.
Wittmann, M.
Schuler, M.
Kollen, B. J.
Sanderman, R.
Schultz, K.
Kocks, J. W. H.
Van der Molen, T.
author_facet Alma, H. J.
de Jong, C.
Jelusic, D.
Wittmann, M.
Schuler, M.
Kollen, B. J.
Sanderman, R.
Schultz, K.
Kocks, J. W. H.
Van der Molen, T.
author_sort Alma, H. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) assesses what change on a measurement tool can be considered minimal clinically relevant. Although the recall period can influence questionnaire scores, it is unclear if it influences the MCID. This study is the first to examine longitudinally the impact of the recall period of an anchor question and its design on the MCID of COPD health status tools using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). METHODS: Moderate to very severe COPD patients without respiratory co-morbidities were recruited during 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR). CAT, CCQ and SGRQ were completed at baseline, discharge, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. A 15-point Global Rating of Change scale (GRC) was completed at each follow-up. A five-point GRC was used as second anchor at 12 months. Mean change scores of a subset of patients indicating a minimal improvement on each of the anchor questions were considered the MCID. The MCID estimates over different time periods were compared with one another by evaluating the degree of overlap of Confidence Intervals (CI) adjusted for dependency. RESULTS: In total 451 patients were included (57.9 ± 6.6 years, 65% male, 50/39/11% GOLD II/III/IV), of which 309 completed follow-up. Baseline health status scores were 20.2 ± 7.3 (CAT), 2.9 ± 1.2 (CCQ) and 50.7 ± 17.3 (SGRQ). MCID estimates for improvement ranged − 3.1 to − 1.4 for CAT, − 0.6 to − 0.3 for CCQ, and − 10.3 to − 7.6 for SGRQ. Absolute higher – though not significant – MCIDs were observed for CAT and CCQ directly after PR. Significantly absolute lower MCID estimates were observed for CAT (difference − 1.4: CI -2.3 to − 0.5) and CCQ (difference − 0.2: CI -0.3 to −0.1) using a five-point GRC. CONCLUSIONS: The recall period of a 15-point anchor question seemed to have limited impact on the MCID for improvement of CAT, CCQ and SGRQ during PR; although a 3-week MCID estimate directly after PR might lead to absolute higher values. However, the design of the anchor question was likely to influence the MCID of CAT and CCQ. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RIMTCORE trial #DRKS00004609 and #12107 (Ethik-Kommission der Bayerischen Landesärztekammer). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60198342018-07-06 Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools Alma, H. J. de Jong, C. Jelusic, D. Wittmann, M. Schuler, M. Kollen, B. J. Sanderman, R. Schultz, K. Kocks, J. W. H. Van der Molen, T. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) assesses what change on a measurement tool can be considered minimal clinically relevant. Although the recall period can influence questionnaire scores, it is unclear if it influences the MCID. This study is the first to examine longitudinally the impact of the recall period of an anchor question and its design on the MCID of COPD health status tools using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). METHODS: Moderate to very severe COPD patients without respiratory co-morbidities were recruited during 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR). CAT, CCQ and SGRQ were completed at baseline, discharge, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. A 15-point Global Rating of Change scale (GRC) was completed at each follow-up. A five-point GRC was used as second anchor at 12 months. Mean change scores of a subset of patients indicating a minimal improvement on each of the anchor questions were considered the MCID. The MCID estimates over different time periods were compared with one another by evaluating the degree of overlap of Confidence Intervals (CI) adjusted for dependency. RESULTS: In total 451 patients were included (57.9 ± 6.6 years, 65% male, 50/39/11% GOLD II/III/IV), of which 309 completed follow-up. Baseline health status scores were 20.2 ± 7.3 (CAT), 2.9 ± 1.2 (CCQ) and 50.7 ± 17.3 (SGRQ). MCID estimates for improvement ranged − 3.1 to − 1.4 for CAT, − 0.6 to − 0.3 for CCQ, and − 10.3 to − 7.6 for SGRQ. Absolute higher – though not significant – MCIDs were observed for CAT and CCQ directly after PR. Significantly absolute lower MCID estimates were observed for CAT (difference − 1.4: CI -2.3 to − 0.5) and CCQ (difference − 0.2: CI -0.3 to −0.1) using a five-point GRC. CONCLUSIONS: The recall period of a 15-point anchor question seemed to have limited impact on the MCID for improvement of CAT, CCQ and SGRQ during PR; although a 3-week MCID estimate directly after PR might lead to absolute higher values. However, the design of the anchor question was likely to influence the MCID of CAT and CCQ. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RIMTCORE trial #DRKS00004609 and #12107 (Ethik-Kommission der Bayerischen Landesärztekammer). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6019834/ /pubmed/29940980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Alma, H. J.
de Jong, C.
Jelusic, D.
Wittmann, M.
Schuler, M.
Kollen, B. J.
Sanderman, R.
Schultz, K.
Kocks, J. W. H.
Van der Molen, T.
Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
title Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
title_full Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
title_fullStr Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
title_full_unstemmed Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
title_short Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
title_sort assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7
work_keys_str_mv AT almahj assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT dejongc assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT jelusicd assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT wittmannm assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT schulerm assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT kollenbj assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT sandermanr assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT schultzk assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT kocksjwh assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools
AT vandermolent assessinghealthstatusovertimeimpactofrecallperiodandanchorquestionontheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofcopdhealthstatustools