Cargando…
IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy planned γ analysis passing rate and respiratory amplitude (A) and period (T) for different tumor volumes. A total of 30 patients with malignant lung tumors were divided into thre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8724 |
_version_ | 1783335205164023808 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Kai Sun, Hongfei Lin, Tao Gao, Liugang Sui, Jianfeng Ni, Xinye |
author_facet | Xie, Kai Sun, Hongfei Lin, Tao Gao, Liugang Sui, Jianfeng Ni, Xinye |
author_sort | Xie, Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy planned γ analysis passing rate and respiratory amplitude (A) and period (T) for different tumor volumes. A total of 30 patients with malignant lung tumors were divided into three groups: A; B; and C. The average tumor volumes (V) in the A, B and C groups were 635, 402 and 213 cm(3), respectively. The simulated A values were set at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm. The T values were set at 4, 5 and 6 sec. The γ analysis passing rate was calculated under different conditions (dose difference, 3%; distance difference, 3 mm). Compared with the γ analysis passing rate in the A group (A=0, static; T=4, 5, 6 sec), the γ analysis passing rate deviation (A=5 mm) was <3.3%. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). With a gradual increase in A value, the passing rate decreased. The deviation between the 3 groups was <2.5% at the same A value (T=4, 5 and 6 sec). A descending trend of passing rate with increased A value was revealed. At the same A and T values, the passing rate decreased with decreased tumor volume. At the same tumor volume, the passing rate decreased when the A value increased. The respiratory cycle was not demonstrated to be associated with the passing rate. Overall, these results suggest that the A value should be controlled in clinical radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6019885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60198852018-06-29 IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion Xie, Kai Sun, Hongfei Lin, Tao Gao, Liugang Sui, Jianfeng Ni, Xinye Oncol Lett Articles The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy planned γ analysis passing rate and respiratory amplitude (A) and period (T) for different tumor volumes. A total of 30 patients with malignant lung tumors were divided into three groups: A; B; and C. The average tumor volumes (V) in the A, B and C groups were 635, 402 and 213 cm(3), respectively. The simulated A values were set at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm. The T values were set at 4, 5 and 6 sec. The γ analysis passing rate was calculated under different conditions (dose difference, 3%; distance difference, 3 mm). Compared with the γ analysis passing rate in the A group (A=0, static; T=4, 5, 6 sec), the γ analysis passing rate deviation (A=5 mm) was <3.3%. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). With a gradual increase in A value, the passing rate decreased. The deviation between the 3 groups was <2.5% at the same A value (T=4, 5 and 6 sec). A descending trend of passing rate with increased A value was revealed. At the same A and T values, the passing rate decreased with decreased tumor volume. At the same tumor volume, the passing rate decreased when the A value increased. The respiratory cycle was not demonstrated to be associated with the passing rate. Overall, these results suggest that the A value should be controlled in clinical radiotherapy. D.A. Spandidos 2018-07 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6019885/ /pubmed/29963170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8724 Text en Copyright: © Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Xie, Kai Sun, Hongfei Lin, Tao Gao, Liugang Sui, Jianfeng Ni, Xinye IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion |
title | IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion |
title_full | IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion |
title_fullStr | IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion |
title_full_unstemmed | IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion |
title_short | IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion |
title_sort | imrt dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiekai imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion AT sunhongfei imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion AT lintao imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion AT gaoliugang imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion AT suijianfeng imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion AT nixinye imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion |