Cargando…

IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion

The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy planned γ analysis passing rate and respiratory amplitude (A) and period (T) for different tumor volumes. A total of 30 patients with malignant lung tumors were divided into thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Kai, Sun, Hongfei, Lin, Tao, Gao, Liugang, Sui, Jianfeng, Ni, Xinye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8724
_version_ 1783335205164023808
author Xie, Kai
Sun, Hongfei
Lin, Tao
Gao, Liugang
Sui, Jianfeng
Ni, Xinye
author_facet Xie, Kai
Sun, Hongfei
Lin, Tao
Gao, Liugang
Sui, Jianfeng
Ni, Xinye
author_sort Xie, Kai
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy planned γ analysis passing rate and respiratory amplitude (A) and period (T) for different tumor volumes. A total of 30 patients with malignant lung tumors were divided into three groups: A; B; and C. The average tumor volumes (V) in the A, B and C groups were 635, 402 and 213 cm(3), respectively. The simulated A values were set at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm. The T values were set at 4, 5 and 6 sec. The γ analysis passing rate was calculated under different conditions (dose difference, 3%; distance difference, 3 mm). Compared with the γ analysis passing rate in the A group (A=0, static; T=4, 5, 6 sec), the γ analysis passing rate deviation (A=5 mm) was <3.3%. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). With a gradual increase in A value, the passing rate decreased. The deviation between the 3 groups was <2.5% at the same A value (T=4, 5 and 6 sec). A descending trend of passing rate with increased A value was revealed. At the same A and T values, the passing rate decreased with decreased tumor volume. At the same tumor volume, the passing rate decreased when the A value increased. The respiratory cycle was not demonstrated to be associated with the passing rate. Overall, these results suggest that the A value should be controlled in clinical radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60198852018-06-29 IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion Xie, Kai Sun, Hongfei Lin, Tao Gao, Liugang Sui, Jianfeng Ni, Xinye Oncol Lett Articles The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy planned γ analysis passing rate and respiratory amplitude (A) and period (T) for different tumor volumes. A total of 30 patients with malignant lung tumors were divided into three groups: A; B; and C. The average tumor volumes (V) in the A, B and C groups were 635, 402 and 213 cm(3), respectively. The simulated A values were set at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm. The T values were set at 4, 5 and 6 sec. The γ analysis passing rate was calculated under different conditions (dose difference, 3%; distance difference, 3 mm). Compared with the γ analysis passing rate in the A group (A=0, static; T=4, 5, 6 sec), the γ analysis passing rate deviation (A=5 mm) was <3.3%. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). With a gradual increase in A value, the passing rate decreased. The deviation between the 3 groups was <2.5% at the same A value (T=4, 5 and 6 sec). A descending trend of passing rate with increased A value was revealed. At the same A and T values, the passing rate decreased with decreased tumor volume. At the same tumor volume, the passing rate decreased when the A value increased. The respiratory cycle was not demonstrated to be associated with the passing rate. Overall, these results suggest that the A value should be controlled in clinical radiotherapy. D.A. Spandidos 2018-07 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6019885/ /pubmed/29963170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8724 Text en Copyright: © Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Xie, Kai
Sun, Hongfei
Lin, Tao
Gao, Liugang
Sui, Jianfeng
Ni, Xinye
IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
title IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
title_full IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
title_fullStr IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
title_full_unstemmed IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
title_short IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
title_sort imrt dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8724
work_keys_str_mv AT xiekai imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion
AT sunhongfei imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion
AT lintao imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion
AT gaoliugang imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion
AT suijianfeng imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion
AT nixinye imrtdoseverificationconsideringpassingrateandrespiratorymotion