Cargando…

Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?

BACKGROUND: Community involvement in research has been advocated by researchers, communities, regulatory agencies, and funders with the aim of reinforcing subjects’ protection and improving research efficiency. Community involvement also has the potential to improve dissemination, uptake, and implem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fregonese, Federica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0283-4
_version_ 1783335221100281856
author Fregonese, Federica
author_facet Fregonese, Federica
author_sort Fregonese, Federica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community involvement in research has been advocated by researchers, communities, regulatory agencies, and funders with the aim of reinforcing subjects’ protection and improving research efficiency. Community involvement also has the potential to improve dissemination, uptake, and implementation of research findings. The fields of community based participatory research conducted with indigenous populations and of participatory action research offer a large base of experience in community involvement in research. Rules on involving the population affected when conducting research have been established in these fields. But what is the role of community engagement in clinical research and observational studies conducted in biomedical research outside of these specific areas? MAIN BODY OF THE ABSTRACT: More than 20 years ago, in the field of HIV medicine, regulatory bodies and funding agencies (such as the US National Institutes of Health) recommended the constitution of a formal organism, the Community Advisory Board (CAB), as part of the study requirements for HIV trials. More recently, CABs have been adopted and used in other fields of medical research, such as malaria. CABs are not without limitations, however, and there is little research on the effectiveness of their use in achieving community protection and participation. Nevertheless, CABs could be a model to import into clinical trials and observational research where no alternative model of community representation is currently being used. CONCLUSIONS: Allocating more resources to training and shifting more power to community representatives could be part of the solution to current CAB limitations. However, for researchers to be able to apply these recommendations on community involvement, certain conditions need to be met. In particular, funding agencies need to recognize the human and financial resources required for serious community involvement, and the academic environment needs to take community involvement into account when appraising, mentoring, and training researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6019999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60199992018-07-06 Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter? Fregonese, Federica BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Community involvement in research has been advocated by researchers, communities, regulatory agencies, and funders with the aim of reinforcing subjects’ protection and improving research efficiency. Community involvement also has the potential to improve dissemination, uptake, and implementation of research findings. The fields of community based participatory research conducted with indigenous populations and of participatory action research offer a large base of experience in community involvement in research. Rules on involving the population affected when conducting research have been established in these fields. But what is the role of community engagement in clinical research and observational studies conducted in biomedical research outside of these specific areas? MAIN BODY OF THE ABSTRACT: More than 20 years ago, in the field of HIV medicine, regulatory bodies and funding agencies (such as the US National Institutes of Health) recommended the constitution of a formal organism, the Community Advisory Board (CAB), as part of the study requirements for HIV trials. More recently, CABs have been adopted and used in other fields of medical research, such as malaria. CABs are not without limitations, however, and there is little research on the effectiveness of their use in achieving community protection and participation. Nevertheless, CABs could be a model to import into clinical trials and observational research where no alternative model of community representation is currently being used. CONCLUSIONS: Allocating more resources to training and shifting more power to community representatives could be part of the solution to current CAB limitations. However, for researchers to be able to apply these recommendations on community involvement, certain conditions need to be met. In particular, funding agencies need to recognize the human and financial resources required for serious community involvement, and the academic environment needs to take community involvement into account when appraising, mentoring, and training researchers. BioMed Central 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6019999/ /pubmed/29945597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0283-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Fregonese, Federica
Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
title Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
title_full Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
title_fullStr Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
title_full_unstemmed Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
title_short Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
title_sort community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6019999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0283-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fregonesefederica communityinvolvementinbiomedicalresearchconductedintheglobalhealthcontextwhatcanbedonetomakeitreallymatter