Cargando…

Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women

BACKGROUND: Emergency contraception (EC) is an effective postcoital contraceptive method for reducing the risk of unwanted pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. The estimated effectiveness of EC is between 70 and 89% if taken within 72 h following intercourse. Most of the studies carried out in S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauzà-Amengual, M. L., Esteva, M., Ingla-Pol, M., Font-Oliver, M. A., March, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6020367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5691-3
_version_ 1783335281883086848
author Bauzà-Amengual, M. L.
Esteva, M.
Ingla-Pol, M.
Font-Oliver, M. A.
March, S.
author_facet Bauzà-Amengual, M. L.
Esteva, M.
Ingla-Pol, M.
Font-Oliver, M. A.
March, S.
author_sort Bauzà-Amengual, M. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency contraception (EC) is an effective postcoital contraceptive method for reducing the risk of unwanted pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. The estimated effectiveness of EC is between 70 and 89% if taken within 72 h following intercourse. Most of the studies carried out in Spain are quantitative and from the perspective of health professionals. In this study, we intend to explore the knowledge of, attitudes towards and discourse regarding the use of EC in women aged 15 to 25 years. METHODS: Sample: A qualitative study including in-depth interviews with 19 women between 15 and 25 years of age was performed. Inclusion criteria: Participants were natives of Spain or of a Latin American country. Segmentation criteria: Participants had experience in the use of EC. DATA COLLECTION: Participants were selected by health care informants and by the snowball technique among university students. Data analysis: A thematic analysis was performed. Preliminary analyses were made during the course of the field work to adapt the script and to assess data saturation. A preliminary code tree was developed by two researchers, and the coding of the text was done with the Atlas.ti 5.0 software. RESULTS: EC is perceived positively by women. They do not express issues with taking it, although some feel guilty. The reason for taking EC is to avoid unwanted pregnancy and abortion. Women also feel that EC should be used in moderation. False beliefs and misconceptions regarding EC are held: EC delivers an excess of hormones, induces abortion and causes severe side effects. Women mention that the health professionals who provide EC have moral beliefs. Women use it because of condom breakage associated with their first coital relations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have public health implications: The sexual-affective health education received by young people should incorporate clear information about the mechanism of action of the EC pill and its side effects together with empowerment strategies addressing guilt and moralistic messages. Programmes and training activities for health professionals must be designed to prevent the communication of inappropriate messages such as those that exaggerate the side effects of EC and those that promote fear and guilt, because they represent a barrier to the responsible use of this medication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6020367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60203672018-07-06 Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women Bauzà-Amengual, M. L. Esteva, M. Ingla-Pol, M. Font-Oliver, M. A. March, S. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Emergency contraception (EC) is an effective postcoital contraceptive method for reducing the risk of unwanted pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. The estimated effectiveness of EC is between 70 and 89% if taken within 72 h following intercourse. Most of the studies carried out in Spain are quantitative and from the perspective of health professionals. In this study, we intend to explore the knowledge of, attitudes towards and discourse regarding the use of EC in women aged 15 to 25 years. METHODS: Sample: A qualitative study including in-depth interviews with 19 women between 15 and 25 years of age was performed. Inclusion criteria: Participants were natives of Spain or of a Latin American country. Segmentation criteria: Participants had experience in the use of EC. DATA COLLECTION: Participants were selected by health care informants and by the snowball technique among university students. Data analysis: A thematic analysis was performed. Preliminary analyses were made during the course of the field work to adapt the script and to assess data saturation. A preliminary code tree was developed by two researchers, and the coding of the text was done with the Atlas.ti 5.0 software. RESULTS: EC is perceived positively by women. They do not express issues with taking it, although some feel guilty. The reason for taking EC is to avoid unwanted pregnancy and abortion. Women also feel that EC should be used in moderation. False beliefs and misconceptions regarding EC are held: EC delivers an excess of hormones, induces abortion and causes severe side effects. Women mention that the health professionals who provide EC have moral beliefs. Women use it because of condom breakage associated with their first coital relations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have public health implications: The sexual-affective health education received by young people should incorporate clear information about the mechanism of action of the EC pill and its side effects together with empowerment strategies addressing guilt and moralistic messages. Programmes and training activities for health professionals must be designed to prevent the communication of inappropriate messages such as those that exaggerate the side effects of EC and those that promote fear and guilt, because they represent a barrier to the responsible use of this medication. BioMed Central 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6020367/ /pubmed/29945582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5691-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bauzà-Amengual, M. L.
Esteva, M.
Ingla-Pol, M.
Font-Oliver, M. A.
March, S.
Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women
title Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women
title_full Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women
title_fullStr Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women
title_full_unstemmed Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women
title_short Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women
title_sort discourses on the postcoital pill in young women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6020367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5691-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bauzaamengualml discoursesonthepostcoitalpillinyoungwomen
AT estevam discoursesonthepostcoitalpillinyoungwomen
AT inglapolm discoursesonthepostcoitalpillinyoungwomen
AT fontoliverma discoursesonthepostcoitalpillinyoungwomen
AT marchs discoursesonthepostcoitalpillinyoungwomen