Cargando…

Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness estimates of particular health care technologies may be limited, or it may even be missing entirely. In these situations, additional information, often in the form of expert judgments, is needed to reach a decision. There are formal me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soares, Marta O., Sharples, Linda, Morton, Alec, Claxton, Karl, Bojke, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29909877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.019
_version_ 1783335498907910144
author Soares, Marta O.
Sharples, Linda
Morton, Alec
Claxton, Karl
Bojke, Laura
author_facet Soares, Marta O.
Sharples, Linda
Morton, Alec
Claxton, Karl
Bojke, Laura
author_sort Soares, Marta O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness estimates of particular health care technologies may be limited, or it may even be missing entirely. In these situations, additional information, often in the form of expert judgments, is needed to reach a decision. There are formal methods to quantify experts’ beliefs, termed as structured expert elicitation (SEE), but only limited research is available in support of methodological choices. Perhaps as a consequence, the use of SEE in the context of cost-effectiveness modelling is limited. OBJECTIVES: This article reviews applications of SEE in cost-effectiveness modelling with the aim of summarizing the basis for methodological choices made in each application and recording the difficulties and challenges reported by the authors in the design, conduct, and analyses. METHODS: The methods used in each application were extracted along with the criteria used to support methodological and practical choices and any issues or challenges discussed in the text. Issues and challenges were extracted using an open field, and then categorised and grouped for reporting. RESULTS: The review demonstrates considerable heterogeneity in methods used, and authors acknowledge great methodological uncertainty in justifying their choices. Specificities of the context area emerging as potentially important in determining further methodological research in elicitation are between- expert variation and its interpretation, the fact that substantive experts in the area may not be trained in quantitative subjects, that judgments are often needed on various parameter types, the need for some form of assessment of validity, and the need for more integration with behavioural research to devise relevant debiasing strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This review of experiences of SEE highlights a number of specificities/constraints that can shape the development of guidance and target future research efforts in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6021555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60215552018-06-29 Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Soares, Marta O. Sharples, Linda Morton, Alec Claxton, Karl Bojke, Laura Value Health Article BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness estimates of particular health care technologies may be limited, or it may even be missing entirely. In these situations, additional information, often in the form of expert judgments, is needed to reach a decision. There are formal methods to quantify experts’ beliefs, termed as structured expert elicitation (SEE), but only limited research is available in support of methodological choices. Perhaps as a consequence, the use of SEE in the context of cost-effectiveness modelling is limited. OBJECTIVES: This article reviews applications of SEE in cost-effectiveness modelling with the aim of summarizing the basis for methodological choices made in each application and recording the difficulties and challenges reported by the authors in the design, conduct, and analyses. METHODS: The methods used in each application were extracted along with the criteria used to support methodological and practical choices and any issues or challenges discussed in the text. Issues and challenges were extracted using an open field, and then categorised and grouped for reporting. RESULTS: The review demonstrates considerable heterogeneity in methods used, and authors acknowledge great methodological uncertainty in justifying their choices. Specificities of the context area emerging as potentially important in determining further methodological research in elicitation are between- expert variation and its interpretation, the fact that substantive experts in the area may not be trained in quantitative subjects, that judgments are often needed on various parameter types, the need for some form of assessment of validity, and the need for more integration with behavioural research to devise relevant debiasing strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This review of experiences of SEE highlights a number of specificities/constraints that can shape the development of guidance and target future research efforts in this area. Elsevier 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6021555/ /pubmed/29909877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.019 Text en © 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Soares, Marta O.
Sharples, Linda
Morton, Alec
Claxton, Karl
Bojke, Laura
Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
title Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
title_full Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
title_fullStr Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
title_short Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
title_sort experiences of structured elicitation for model-based cost-effectiveness analyses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29909877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.019
work_keys_str_mv AT soaresmartao experiencesofstructuredelicitationformodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalyses
AT sharpleslinda experiencesofstructuredelicitationformodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalyses
AT mortonalec experiencesofstructuredelicitationformodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalyses
AT claxtonkarl experiencesofstructuredelicitationformodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalyses
AT bojkelaura experiencesofstructuredelicitationformodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalyses