Cargando…

Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence

Background: Shigella remains the primary cause of diarrhoea in paediatric patients worldwide and accounts for up to 40,000 deaths per year. Current guidelines for the treatment of shigellosis are based on data which are over a decade old. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, an updated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Phoebe C. M., Berkley, James A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29790845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2017.1409454
_version_ 1783335531995725824
author Williams, Phoebe C. M.
Berkley, James A.
author_facet Williams, Phoebe C. M.
Berkley, James A.
author_sort Williams, Phoebe C. M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Shigella remains the primary cause of diarrhoea in paediatric patients worldwide and accounts for up to 40,000 deaths per year. Current guidelines for the treatment of shigellosis are based on data which are over a decade old. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, an updated review of the appropriate empirical therapy for shigellosis in children is necessary, taking into account susceptibility patterns, cost and the risk of adverse events. Methods: A systematic review of the current published literature on the treatment of shigella dysentery was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: The initial search produced 131 results, of which nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed as per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. International guidelines were also reviewed. There is a lack of current research regarding the clinical treatment of shigellosis in paediatric and adult patients, despite rising antimicrobial resistance worldwide. In particular, there is a lack of studies assessing the non-susceptibility of community-acquired strains, with almost all published research pertaining to microbiological data from hospital-based settings. Discussion: Current WHO guidelines support the use of fluoroquinolones (first-line), β-lactams (second-line) and cephalosporins (second-line) which accords with currently available evidence and other international guidelines, and there is no strong evidence for changing this guidance. Azithromycin is appropriate as a second-line therapy in regions where the rate of non-susceptibility of ciprofloxacin is known to be high, and research suggests that, from a cardiac point of view, azithromycin is safer than other macrolide antibiotics. Cefixime is also a reasonable alternative, although its use must be weighed against the risk of dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6021764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60217642018-07-09 Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence Williams, Phoebe C. M. Berkley, James A. Paediatr Int Child Health Reviews Background: Shigella remains the primary cause of diarrhoea in paediatric patients worldwide and accounts for up to 40,000 deaths per year. Current guidelines for the treatment of shigellosis are based on data which are over a decade old. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, an updated review of the appropriate empirical therapy for shigellosis in children is necessary, taking into account susceptibility patterns, cost and the risk of adverse events. Methods: A systematic review of the current published literature on the treatment of shigella dysentery was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: The initial search produced 131 results, of which nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed as per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. International guidelines were also reviewed. There is a lack of current research regarding the clinical treatment of shigellosis in paediatric and adult patients, despite rising antimicrobial resistance worldwide. In particular, there is a lack of studies assessing the non-susceptibility of community-acquired strains, with almost all published research pertaining to microbiological data from hospital-based settings. Discussion: Current WHO guidelines support the use of fluoroquinolones (first-line), β-lactams (second-line) and cephalosporins (second-line) which accords with currently available evidence and other international guidelines, and there is no strong evidence for changing this guidance. Azithromycin is appropriate as a second-line therapy in regions where the rate of non-susceptibility of ciprofloxacin is known to be high, and research suggests that, from a cardiac point of view, azithromycin is safer than other macrolide antibiotics. Cefixime is also a reasonable alternative, although its use must be weighed against the risk of dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organisms. Taylor & Francis 2018-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6021764/ /pubmed/29790845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2017.1409454 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Williams, Phoebe C. M.
Berkley, James A.
Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence
title Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence
title_full Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence
title_fullStr Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence
title_short Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence
title_sort guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29790845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2017.1409454
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsphoebecm guidelinesforthetreatmentofdysenteryshigellosisasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT berkleyjamesa guidelinesforthetreatmentofdysenteryshigellosisasystematicreviewoftheevidence