Cargando…

An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated to reliably measure human joint angles—an essential quantity in the study of biomechanics. However, most previous literature proposed IMU-based joint angle measurement systems that required manual alignment or prescribed calibration motions. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGrath, Timothy, Fineman, Richard, Stirling, Leia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061882
_version_ 1783335547618459648
author McGrath, Timothy
Fineman, Richard
Stirling, Leia
author_facet McGrath, Timothy
Fineman, Richard
Stirling, Leia
author_sort McGrath, Timothy
collection PubMed
description Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated to reliably measure human joint angles—an essential quantity in the study of biomechanics. However, most previous literature proposed IMU-based joint angle measurement systems that required manual alignment or prescribed calibration motions. This paper presents a simple, physically-intuitive method for IMU-based measurement of the knee flexion/extension angle in gait without requiring alignment or discrete calibration, based on computationally-efficient and easy-to-implement Principle Component Analysis (PCA). The method is compared against an optical motion capture knee flexion/extension angle modeled through OpenSim. The method is evaluated using both measured and simulated IMU data in an observational study (n = 15) with an absolute root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 9.24 [Formula: see text] and a zero-mean RMSE of 3.49 [Formula: see text]. Variation in error across subjects was found, made emergent by the larger subject population than previous literature considers. Finally, the paper presents an explanatory model of RMSE on IMU mounting location. The observational data suggest that RMSE of the method is a function of thigh IMU perturbation and axis estimation quality. However, the effect size for these parameters is small in comparison to potential gains from improved IMU orientation estimations. Results also highlight the need to set relevant datums from which to interpret joint angles for both truth references and estimated data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6021833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60218332018-07-02 An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors McGrath, Timothy Fineman, Richard Stirling, Leia Sensors (Basel) Article Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated to reliably measure human joint angles—an essential quantity in the study of biomechanics. However, most previous literature proposed IMU-based joint angle measurement systems that required manual alignment or prescribed calibration motions. This paper presents a simple, physically-intuitive method for IMU-based measurement of the knee flexion/extension angle in gait without requiring alignment or discrete calibration, based on computationally-efficient and easy-to-implement Principle Component Analysis (PCA). The method is compared against an optical motion capture knee flexion/extension angle modeled through OpenSim. The method is evaluated using both measured and simulated IMU data in an observational study (n = 15) with an absolute root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 9.24 [Formula: see text] and a zero-mean RMSE of 3.49 [Formula: see text]. Variation in error across subjects was found, made emergent by the larger subject population than previous literature considers. Finally, the paper presents an explanatory model of RMSE on IMU mounting location. The observational data suggest that RMSE of the method is a function of thigh IMU perturbation and axis estimation quality. However, the effect size for these parameters is small in comparison to potential gains from improved IMU orientation estimations. Results also highlight the need to set relevant datums from which to interpret joint angles for both truth references and estimated data. MDPI 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6021833/ /pubmed/29890667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061882 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McGrath, Timothy
Fineman, Richard
Stirling, Leia
An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors
title An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors
title_full An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors
title_fullStr An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors
title_full_unstemmed An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors
title_short An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors
title_sort auto-calibrating knee flexion-extension axis estimator using principal component analysis with inertial sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061882
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgrathtimothy anautocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors
AT finemanrichard anautocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors
AT stirlingleia anautocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors
AT mcgrathtimothy autocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors
AT finemanrichard autocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors
AT stirlingleia autocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors