Cargando…
An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated to reliably measure human joint angles—an essential quantity in the study of biomechanics. However, most previous literature proposed IMU-based joint angle measurement systems that required manual alignment or prescribed calibration motions. T...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061882 |
_version_ | 1783335547618459648 |
---|---|
author | McGrath, Timothy Fineman, Richard Stirling, Leia |
author_facet | McGrath, Timothy Fineman, Richard Stirling, Leia |
author_sort | McGrath, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated to reliably measure human joint angles—an essential quantity in the study of biomechanics. However, most previous literature proposed IMU-based joint angle measurement systems that required manual alignment or prescribed calibration motions. This paper presents a simple, physically-intuitive method for IMU-based measurement of the knee flexion/extension angle in gait without requiring alignment or discrete calibration, based on computationally-efficient and easy-to-implement Principle Component Analysis (PCA). The method is compared against an optical motion capture knee flexion/extension angle modeled through OpenSim. The method is evaluated using both measured and simulated IMU data in an observational study (n = 15) with an absolute root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 9.24 [Formula: see text] and a zero-mean RMSE of 3.49 [Formula: see text]. Variation in error across subjects was found, made emergent by the larger subject population than previous literature considers. Finally, the paper presents an explanatory model of RMSE on IMU mounting location. The observational data suggest that RMSE of the method is a function of thigh IMU perturbation and axis estimation quality. However, the effect size for these parameters is small in comparison to potential gains from improved IMU orientation estimations. Results also highlight the need to set relevant datums from which to interpret joint angles for both truth references and estimated data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6021833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60218332018-07-02 An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors McGrath, Timothy Fineman, Richard Stirling, Leia Sensors (Basel) Article Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been demonstrated to reliably measure human joint angles—an essential quantity in the study of biomechanics. However, most previous literature proposed IMU-based joint angle measurement systems that required manual alignment or prescribed calibration motions. This paper presents a simple, physically-intuitive method for IMU-based measurement of the knee flexion/extension angle in gait without requiring alignment or discrete calibration, based on computationally-efficient and easy-to-implement Principle Component Analysis (PCA). The method is compared against an optical motion capture knee flexion/extension angle modeled through OpenSim. The method is evaluated using both measured and simulated IMU data in an observational study (n = 15) with an absolute root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 9.24 [Formula: see text] and a zero-mean RMSE of 3.49 [Formula: see text]. Variation in error across subjects was found, made emergent by the larger subject population than previous literature considers. Finally, the paper presents an explanatory model of RMSE on IMU mounting location. The observational data suggest that RMSE of the method is a function of thigh IMU perturbation and axis estimation quality. However, the effect size for these parameters is small in comparison to potential gains from improved IMU orientation estimations. Results also highlight the need to set relevant datums from which to interpret joint angles for both truth references and estimated data. MDPI 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6021833/ /pubmed/29890667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061882 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article McGrath, Timothy Fineman, Richard Stirling, Leia An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors |
title | An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors |
title_full | An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors |
title_fullStr | An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors |
title_short | An Auto-Calibrating Knee Flexion-Extension Axis Estimator Using Principal Component Analysis with Inertial Sensors |
title_sort | auto-calibrating knee flexion-extension axis estimator using principal component analysis with inertial sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6021833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061882 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgrathtimothy anautocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors AT finemanrichard anautocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors AT stirlingleia anautocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors AT mcgrathtimothy autocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors AT finemanrichard autocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors AT stirlingleia autocalibratingkneeflexionextensionaxisestimatorusingprincipalcomponentanalysiswithinertialsensors |