Cargando…

Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System

The present paper describes the experimentation in a controlled environment and a real environment using different photosensors, such as infrared light emitting diode (IRLED-as receiver), photodiode, light dependent resistor (LDR), and blue LED for the purpose of selecting those devices, which can b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flores-Fuentes, Wendy, Miranda-Vega, Jesús Elías, Rivas-López, Moisés, Sergiyenko, Oleg, Rodríguez-Quiñonez, Julio C., Lindner, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29882912
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061684
_version_ 1783335605793456128
author Flores-Fuentes, Wendy
Miranda-Vega, Jesús Elías
Rivas-López, Moisés
Sergiyenko, Oleg
Rodríguez-Quiñonez, Julio C.
Lindner, Lars
author_facet Flores-Fuentes, Wendy
Miranda-Vega, Jesús Elías
Rivas-López, Moisés
Sergiyenko, Oleg
Rodríguez-Quiñonez, Julio C.
Lindner, Lars
author_sort Flores-Fuentes, Wendy
collection PubMed
description The present paper describes the experimentation in a controlled environment and a real environment using different photosensors, such as infrared light emitting diode (IRLED-as receiver), photodiode, light dependent resistor (LDR), and blue LED for the purpose of selecting those devices, which can be employed in adverse conditions, such as sunlight or artificial sources. The experiments that are described in this paper confirmed that the blue LED and phototransistor could be used as a photosensor of an Optical Scanning System (OSS), because they were less sensitive to sunlight radiation. Moreover, they are appropriate as reference sources that are selected for the experiment (blue LED flashlight and light bulb). The best experimental results that were obtained contained a digital filter that was applied to the output of the photosensor, which reduced the standard deviation for the best case for the phototransistor LED from 100.26 to 0.15. For the best case, using the blue LED, the standard deviation was reduced from 86.08 to 0.11. Using these types of devices the cost of the Optical Scanning System can be reduced and a considerable increase in resolution and accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6022098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60220982018-07-02 Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System Flores-Fuentes, Wendy Miranda-Vega, Jesús Elías Rivas-López, Moisés Sergiyenko, Oleg Rodríguez-Quiñonez, Julio C. Lindner, Lars Sensors (Basel) Article The present paper describes the experimentation in a controlled environment and a real environment using different photosensors, such as infrared light emitting diode (IRLED-as receiver), photodiode, light dependent resistor (LDR), and blue LED for the purpose of selecting those devices, which can be employed in adverse conditions, such as sunlight or artificial sources. The experiments that are described in this paper confirmed that the blue LED and phototransistor could be used as a photosensor of an Optical Scanning System (OSS), because they were less sensitive to sunlight radiation. Moreover, they are appropriate as reference sources that are selected for the experiment (blue LED flashlight and light bulb). The best experimental results that were obtained contained a digital filter that was applied to the output of the photosensor, which reduced the standard deviation for the best case for the phototransistor LED from 100.26 to 0.15. For the best case, using the blue LED, the standard deviation was reduced from 86.08 to 0.11. Using these types of devices the cost of the Optical Scanning System can be reduced and a considerable increase in resolution and accuracy. MDPI 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6022098/ /pubmed/29882912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061684 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Flores-Fuentes, Wendy
Miranda-Vega, Jesús Elías
Rivas-López, Moisés
Sergiyenko, Oleg
Rodríguez-Quiñonez, Julio C.
Lindner, Lars
Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System
title Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System
title_full Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System
title_fullStr Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System
title_short Comparison between Different Types of Sensors Used in the Real Operational Environment Based on Optical Scanning System
title_sort comparison between different types of sensors used in the real operational environment based on optical scanning system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29882912
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18061684
work_keys_str_mv AT floresfuenteswendy comparisonbetweendifferenttypesofsensorsusedintherealoperationalenvironmentbasedonopticalscanningsystem
AT mirandavegajesuselias comparisonbetweendifferenttypesofsensorsusedintherealoperationalenvironmentbasedonopticalscanningsystem
AT rivaslopezmoises comparisonbetweendifferenttypesofsensorsusedintherealoperationalenvironmentbasedonopticalscanningsystem
AT sergiyenkooleg comparisonbetweendifferenttypesofsensorsusedintherealoperationalenvironmentbasedonopticalscanningsystem
AT rodriguezquinonezjulioc comparisonbetweendifferenttypesofsensorsusedintherealoperationalenvironmentbasedonopticalscanningsystem
AT lindnerlars comparisonbetweendifferenttypesofsensorsusedintherealoperationalenvironmentbasedonopticalscanningsystem