Cargando…

Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) has been reported in many malignancies. In present study, we aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of CONUT in gastric cancer (GC) receiving curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xuechao, Zhang, Deyao, Lin, Enzi, Chen, Yongming, Li, Wei, Chen, Yingbo, Sun, Xiaowei, Zhou, Zhiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29954375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4616-y
_version_ 1783335690045489152
author Liu, Xuechao
Zhang, Deyao
Lin, Enzi
Chen, Yongming
Li, Wei
Chen, Yingbo
Sun, Xiaowei
Zhou, Zhiwei
author_facet Liu, Xuechao
Zhang, Deyao
Lin, Enzi
Chen, Yongming
Li, Wei
Chen, Yingbo
Sun, Xiaowei
Zhou, Zhiwei
author_sort Liu, Xuechao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) has been reported in many malignancies. In present study, we aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of CONUT in gastric cancer (GC) receiving curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 697 consecutive patients undergoing curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II-III GC between November 2000 and September 2012. Patients were classified into high (≥3) and low (≤2) CONUT groups according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 217 (31.1%) belonged to the high CONUT group. The high CONUT group had a significantly lower 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate than the low CONUT group (39.3 vs. 55.5%, P < 0.001). High CONUT score was significantly associated with larger tumor size, more lymph node metastasis, and poorer nutritional status, including lower body mass index (BMI), higher prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the presence of preoperative anemia (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that CONUT score was an independent prognostic factor (HR: 1.553; 95% CI: 1.080–2.232; P = 0.017). Of note, in the low PNI group, CONUT score still effectively stratified CSS (P = 0.016). Furthermore, the prognostic significance of CONUT score was also maintained when stratified by TNM stage (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CONUT score is considered a useful nutritional marker for predicting prognosis in stage II-III GC patients undergoing curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, and may help to facilitate the planning of preoperative nutritional interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4616-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6022496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60224962018-07-09 Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer Liu, Xuechao Zhang, Deyao Lin, Enzi Chen, Yongming Li, Wei Chen, Yingbo Sun, Xiaowei Zhou, Zhiwei BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) has been reported in many malignancies. In present study, we aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of CONUT in gastric cancer (GC) receiving curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 697 consecutive patients undergoing curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II-III GC between November 2000 and September 2012. Patients were classified into high (≥3) and low (≤2) CONUT groups according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 217 (31.1%) belonged to the high CONUT group. The high CONUT group had a significantly lower 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate than the low CONUT group (39.3 vs. 55.5%, P < 0.001). High CONUT score was significantly associated with larger tumor size, more lymph node metastasis, and poorer nutritional status, including lower body mass index (BMI), higher prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the presence of preoperative anemia (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that CONUT score was an independent prognostic factor (HR: 1.553; 95% CI: 1.080–2.232; P = 0.017). Of note, in the low PNI group, CONUT score still effectively stratified CSS (P = 0.016). Furthermore, the prognostic significance of CONUT score was also maintained when stratified by TNM stage (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CONUT score is considered a useful nutritional marker for predicting prognosis in stage II-III GC patients undergoing curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, and may help to facilitate the planning of preoperative nutritional interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4616-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6022496/ /pubmed/29954375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4616-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Xuechao
Zhang, Deyao
Lin, Enzi
Chen, Yongming
Li, Wei
Chen, Yingbo
Sun, Xiaowei
Zhou, Zhiwei
Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer
title Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer
title_full Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer
title_short Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer
title_sort preoperative controlling nutritional status (conut) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage ii-iii gastric cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6022496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29954375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4616-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxuechao preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer
AT zhangdeyao preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer
AT linenzi preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer
AT chenyongming preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer
AT liwei preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer
AT chenyingbo preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer
AT sunxiaowei preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer
AT zhouzhiwei preoperativecontrollingnutritionalstatusconutscoreasapredictoroflongtermoutcomeaftercurativeresectionfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiigastriccancer