Cargando…

Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents in recent years, but their global effects remain unknown since 2008, the last date of a comprehensive review of prior studies. AIMS: This study aims at evaluati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales, Alexandra, Espada, José P., Orgilés, Mireia, Escribano, Silvia, Johnson, Blair T., Lightfoot, Marguerita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29953546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199421
_version_ 1783335806308450304
author Morales, Alexandra
Espada, José P.
Orgilés, Mireia
Escribano, Silvia
Johnson, Blair T.
Lightfoot, Marguerita
author_facet Morales, Alexandra
Espada, José P.
Orgilés, Mireia
Escribano, Silvia
Johnson, Blair T.
Lightfoot, Marguerita
author_sort Morales, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents in recent years, but their global effects remain unknown since 2008, the last date of a comprehensive review of prior studies. AIMS: This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of interventions to promote sexual health, reduce STIs and unplanned pregnancies targeted to adolescents available after 2008; and analyzing the moderators of their global efficacy. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and manual searches of some journals focused on STIs in May 2016. The studies evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce sexual risk in adolescents (age range: 11–19) anywhere in the world. Effect size of the relevant outcomes for sexual risk was calculated for every study. Analyses incorporated random-effect assumptions for each outcome. The homogeneity in the results was examined with the I(2) statistic and its associated 95% confident interval. RESULTS: Data from 63 studies (59,795 participants) were analyzed for behavioral and non-behavioral outcomes. In the short term, interventions had a positive impact in sexual health-related knowledge (Hedges’g = 1.01), attitudes (g = 0.29), self-efficacy toward condom use (g = 0.22), intention to refuse sex (g = 0.56), condom use intention (g = 0.46), and condom use (g = 0.38). In the medium term, positive effects observed at the short-term were maintained, although effect size significantly decreased in all variables. In the long term, interventions improved condom use (g = 0.47). Moderators of the efficacy are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual health promotion interventions are effective to promote sexual health through increasing condom use. Effects on non-behavioral variables tend to decrease over time, while condom use increased in the long-term. Interventions should focus on the long-term efficacy, especially in behavioral and biological measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6023153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60231532018-07-07 Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016 Morales, Alexandra Espada, José P. Orgilés, Mireia Escribano, Silvia Johnson, Blair T. Lightfoot, Marguerita PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents in recent years, but their global effects remain unknown since 2008, the last date of a comprehensive review of prior studies. AIMS: This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of interventions to promote sexual health, reduce STIs and unplanned pregnancies targeted to adolescents available after 2008; and analyzing the moderators of their global efficacy. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and manual searches of some journals focused on STIs in May 2016. The studies evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce sexual risk in adolescents (age range: 11–19) anywhere in the world. Effect size of the relevant outcomes for sexual risk was calculated for every study. Analyses incorporated random-effect assumptions for each outcome. The homogeneity in the results was examined with the I(2) statistic and its associated 95% confident interval. RESULTS: Data from 63 studies (59,795 participants) were analyzed for behavioral and non-behavioral outcomes. In the short term, interventions had a positive impact in sexual health-related knowledge (Hedges’g = 1.01), attitudes (g = 0.29), self-efficacy toward condom use (g = 0.22), intention to refuse sex (g = 0.56), condom use intention (g = 0.46), and condom use (g = 0.38). In the medium term, positive effects observed at the short-term were maintained, although effect size significantly decreased in all variables. In the long term, interventions improved condom use (g = 0.47). Moderators of the efficacy are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual health promotion interventions are effective to promote sexual health through increasing condom use. Effects on non-behavioral variables tend to decrease over time, while condom use increased in the long-term. Interventions should focus on the long-term efficacy, especially in behavioral and biological measures. Public Library of Science 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6023153/ /pubmed/29953546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199421 Text en © 2018 Morales et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morales, Alexandra
Espada, José P.
Orgilés, Mireia
Escribano, Silvia
Johnson, Blair T.
Lightfoot, Marguerita
Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016
title Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016
title_full Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016
title_fullStr Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016
title_short Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016
title_sort interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: a meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29953546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199421
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesalexandra interventionstoreduceriskforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsinadolescentsametaanalysisoftrials20082016
AT espadajosep interventionstoreduceriskforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsinadolescentsametaanalysisoftrials20082016
AT orgilesmireia interventionstoreduceriskforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsinadolescentsametaanalysisoftrials20082016
AT escribanosilvia interventionstoreduceriskforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsinadolescentsametaanalysisoftrials20082016
AT johnsonblairt interventionstoreduceriskforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsinadolescentsametaanalysisoftrials20082016
AT lightfootmarguerita interventionstoreduceriskforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsinadolescentsametaanalysisoftrials20082016