Cargando…
A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement in healthcare has often been promoted as different from and more valuable than peer review and other professional self-regulation processes. In spite of attempts to harmonize these two approaches, the perception of dichotomous opposition has persisted. A sequence of e...
Autores principales: | Hill, Terry E., Martelli, Peter F., Kuo, Julie H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29953510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199961 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer review process
por: Jawaid, Shaukat Ali
Publicado: (2023) -
Quantifying professionalism in peer review
por: Gerwing, Travis G., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Quality in peer review
Publicado: (2019) -
Interferon revisited: Peering behind the lines of antiviral defense
por: Virzì, Alessia, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012)