Cargando…

Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test

BACKGROUND: ATCC HIV-1 drug resistance test kit was designed to detect HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes for all HIV-1 group M subtypes and circulating recombinant forms. The test has been validated for both plasma and dried blood spot specimen t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosemary, Audu, Chika, Onwuamah, Jonathan, Okpokwu, Godwin, Imade, Georgina, Odaibo, Azuka, Okwuraiwe, Zaidat, Musa, Philippe, Chebu, Oliver, Ezechi, Oche, Agbaji, David, Olaleye, Jay, Samuel, Ibrahim, Dalhatu, Mukhtar, Ahmed, Joshua, DeVos, Chunfu, Yang, Elliot, Raizes, Beth, Chaplin, Phyllis, Kanki, Emmanuel, Idigbe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29953436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198246
_version_ 1783335811881631744
author Rosemary, Audu
Chika, Onwuamah
Jonathan, Okpokwu
Godwin, Imade
Georgina, Odaibo
Azuka, Okwuraiwe
Zaidat, Musa
Philippe, Chebu
Oliver, Ezechi
Oche, Agbaji
David, Olaleye
Jay, Samuel
Ibrahim, Dalhatu
Mukhtar, Ahmed
Joshua, DeVos
Chunfu, Yang
Elliot, Raizes
Beth, Chaplin
Phyllis, Kanki
Emmanuel, Idigbe
author_facet Rosemary, Audu
Chika, Onwuamah
Jonathan, Okpokwu
Godwin, Imade
Georgina, Odaibo
Azuka, Okwuraiwe
Zaidat, Musa
Philippe, Chebu
Oliver, Ezechi
Oche, Agbaji
David, Olaleye
Jay, Samuel
Ibrahim, Dalhatu
Mukhtar, Ahmed
Joshua, DeVos
Chunfu, Yang
Elliot, Raizes
Beth, Chaplin
Phyllis, Kanki
Emmanuel, Idigbe
author_sort Rosemary, Audu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: ATCC HIV-1 drug resistance test kit was designed to detect HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes for all HIV-1 group M subtypes and circulating recombinant forms. The test has been validated for both plasma and dried blood spot specimen types with viral load (VL) of ≥1000 copies/ml. We performed an in-country assessment on the kit to determine the genotyping sensitivity and its accuracy in detecting HIVDR mutations using plasma samples stored under suboptimal conditions. METHODS: Among 572 samples with VL ≥1000 copies/ml that had been genotyped by ViroSeq assay, 183 were randomly selected, including 85 successful genotyped and 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples. They were tested with ATCC kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequence identity and HIVDR patterns were analysed with Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance HIVdb program. RESULTS: Of the 183 samples, 127 (69.4%) were successfully genotyped by either method. While ViroSeq system genotyped 85/183 (46.5%) with median VL of 32,971 (IQR: 11,150–96,506) copies/ml, ATCC genotyped 115/183 (62.8%) samples with median VL of 23,068 (IQR: 7,397–86,086) copies/ml. Of the 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples with ViroSeq assay, 42 (42.9%) samples with lower median VL of 13,906 (IQR: 6,122–72,329) copies/ml were successfully genotyped using ATCC. Sequence identity analysis revealed that the sequences generated by both methods were >98% identical and yielded similar HIVDR profiles at individual patient level. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that ATCC kit showed greater sensitivity in genotyping plasma samples stored in suboptimal conditions experiencing frequent and prolonged power outage. Thus, it is more sensitive particularly for subtypes A and A/G HIV-1 in resource-limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6023177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60231772018-07-07 Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test Rosemary, Audu Chika, Onwuamah Jonathan, Okpokwu Godwin, Imade Georgina, Odaibo Azuka, Okwuraiwe Zaidat, Musa Philippe, Chebu Oliver, Ezechi Oche, Agbaji David, Olaleye Jay, Samuel Ibrahim, Dalhatu Mukhtar, Ahmed Joshua, DeVos Chunfu, Yang Elliot, Raizes Beth, Chaplin Phyllis, Kanki Emmanuel, Idigbe PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: ATCC HIV-1 drug resistance test kit was designed to detect HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes for all HIV-1 group M subtypes and circulating recombinant forms. The test has been validated for both plasma and dried blood spot specimen types with viral load (VL) of ≥1000 copies/ml. We performed an in-country assessment on the kit to determine the genotyping sensitivity and its accuracy in detecting HIVDR mutations using plasma samples stored under suboptimal conditions. METHODS: Among 572 samples with VL ≥1000 copies/ml that had been genotyped by ViroSeq assay, 183 were randomly selected, including 85 successful genotyped and 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples. They were tested with ATCC kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequence identity and HIVDR patterns were analysed with Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance HIVdb program. RESULTS: Of the 183 samples, 127 (69.4%) were successfully genotyped by either method. While ViroSeq system genotyped 85/183 (46.5%) with median VL of 32,971 (IQR: 11,150–96,506) copies/ml, ATCC genotyped 115/183 (62.8%) samples with median VL of 23,068 (IQR: 7,397–86,086) copies/ml. Of the 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples with ViroSeq assay, 42 (42.9%) samples with lower median VL of 13,906 (IQR: 6,122–72,329) copies/ml were successfully genotyped using ATCC. Sequence identity analysis revealed that the sequences generated by both methods were >98% identical and yielded similar HIVDR profiles at individual patient level. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that ATCC kit showed greater sensitivity in genotyping plasma samples stored in suboptimal conditions experiencing frequent and prolonged power outage. Thus, it is more sensitive particularly for subtypes A and A/G HIV-1 in resource-limited settings. Public Library of Science 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6023177/ /pubmed/29953436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198246 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rosemary, Audu
Chika, Onwuamah
Jonathan, Okpokwu
Godwin, Imade
Georgina, Odaibo
Azuka, Okwuraiwe
Zaidat, Musa
Philippe, Chebu
Oliver, Ezechi
Oche, Agbaji
David, Olaleye
Jay, Samuel
Ibrahim, Dalhatu
Mukhtar, Ahmed
Joshua, DeVos
Chunfu, Yang
Elliot, Raizes
Beth, Chaplin
Phyllis, Kanki
Emmanuel, Idigbe
Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test
title Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test
title_full Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test
title_fullStr Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test
title_full_unstemmed Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test
title_short Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test
title_sort genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available hiv-1 drug resistance test
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29953436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198246
work_keys_str_mv AT rosemaryaudu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT chikaonwuamah genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT jonathanokpokwu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT godwinimade genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT georginaodaibo genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT azukaokwuraiwe genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT zaidatmusa genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT philippechebu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT oliverezechi genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT ocheagbaji genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT davidolaleye genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT jaysamuel genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT ibrahimdalhatu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT mukhtarahmed genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT joshuadevos genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT chunfuyang genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT elliotraizes genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT bethchaplin genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT phylliskanki genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest
AT emmanuelidigbe genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest