Cargando…
Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test
BACKGROUND: ATCC HIV-1 drug resistance test kit was designed to detect HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes for all HIV-1 group M subtypes and circulating recombinant forms. The test has been validated for both plasma and dried blood spot specimen t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29953436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198246 |
_version_ | 1783335811881631744 |
---|---|
author | Rosemary, Audu Chika, Onwuamah Jonathan, Okpokwu Godwin, Imade Georgina, Odaibo Azuka, Okwuraiwe Zaidat, Musa Philippe, Chebu Oliver, Ezechi Oche, Agbaji David, Olaleye Jay, Samuel Ibrahim, Dalhatu Mukhtar, Ahmed Joshua, DeVos Chunfu, Yang Elliot, Raizes Beth, Chaplin Phyllis, Kanki Emmanuel, Idigbe |
author_facet | Rosemary, Audu Chika, Onwuamah Jonathan, Okpokwu Godwin, Imade Georgina, Odaibo Azuka, Okwuraiwe Zaidat, Musa Philippe, Chebu Oliver, Ezechi Oche, Agbaji David, Olaleye Jay, Samuel Ibrahim, Dalhatu Mukhtar, Ahmed Joshua, DeVos Chunfu, Yang Elliot, Raizes Beth, Chaplin Phyllis, Kanki Emmanuel, Idigbe |
author_sort | Rosemary, Audu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ATCC HIV-1 drug resistance test kit was designed to detect HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes for all HIV-1 group M subtypes and circulating recombinant forms. The test has been validated for both plasma and dried blood spot specimen types with viral load (VL) of ≥1000 copies/ml. We performed an in-country assessment on the kit to determine the genotyping sensitivity and its accuracy in detecting HIVDR mutations using plasma samples stored under suboptimal conditions. METHODS: Among 572 samples with VL ≥1000 copies/ml that had been genotyped by ViroSeq assay, 183 were randomly selected, including 85 successful genotyped and 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples. They were tested with ATCC kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequence identity and HIVDR patterns were analysed with Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance HIVdb program. RESULTS: Of the 183 samples, 127 (69.4%) were successfully genotyped by either method. While ViroSeq system genotyped 85/183 (46.5%) with median VL of 32,971 (IQR: 11,150–96,506) copies/ml, ATCC genotyped 115/183 (62.8%) samples with median VL of 23,068 (IQR: 7,397–86,086) copies/ml. Of the 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples with ViroSeq assay, 42 (42.9%) samples with lower median VL of 13,906 (IQR: 6,122–72,329) copies/ml were successfully genotyped using ATCC. Sequence identity analysis revealed that the sequences generated by both methods were >98% identical and yielded similar HIVDR profiles at individual patient level. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that ATCC kit showed greater sensitivity in genotyping plasma samples stored in suboptimal conditions experiencing frequent and prolonged power outage. Thus, it is more sensitive particularly for subtypes A and A/G HIV-1 in resource-limited settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6023177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60231772018-07-07 Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test Rosemary, Audu Chika, Onwuamah Jonathan, Okpokwu Godwin, Imade Georgina, Odaibo Azuka, Okwuraiwe Zaidat, Musa Philippe, Chebu Oliver, Ezechi Oche, Agbaji David, Olaleye Jay, Samuel Ibrahim, Dalhatu Mukhtar, Ahmed Joshua, DeVos Chunfu, Yang Elliot, Raizes Beth, Chaplin Phyllis, Kanki Emmanuel, Idigbe PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: ATCC HIV-1 drug resistance test kit was designed to detect HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes for all HIV-1 group M subtypes and circulating recombinant forms. The test has been validated for both plasma and dried blood spot specimen types with viral load (VL) of ≥1000 copies/ml. We performed an in-country assessment on the kit to determine the genotyping sensitivity and its accuracy in detecting HIVDR mutations using plasma samples stored under suboptimal conditions. METHODS: Among 572 samples with VL ≥1000 copies/ml that had been genotyped by ViroSeq assay, 183 were randomly selected, including 85 successful genotyped and 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples. They were tested with ATCC kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequence identity and HIVDR patterns were analysed with Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance HIVdb program. RESULTS: Of the 183 samples, 127 (69.4%) were successfully genotyped by either method. While ViroSeq system genotyped 85/183 (46.5%) with median VL of 32,971 (IQR: 11,150–96,506) copies/ml, ATCC genotyped 115/183 (62.8%) samples with median VL of 23,068 (IQR: 7,397–86,086) copies/ml. Of the 98 unsuccessful genotyped samples with ViroSeq assay, 42 (42.9%) samples with lower median VL of 13,906 (IQR: 6,122–72,329) copies/ml were successfully genotyped using ATCC. Sequence identity analysis revealed that the sequences generated by both methods were >98% identical and yielded similar HIVDR profiles at individual patient level. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that ATCC kit showed greater sensitivity in genotyping plasma samples stored in suboptimal conditions experiencing frequent and prolonged power outage. Thus, it is more sensitive particularly for subtypes A and A/G HIV-1 in resource-limited settings. Public Library of Science 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6023177/ /pubmed/29953436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198246 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rosemary, Audu Chika, Onwuamah Jonathan, Okpokwu Godwin, Imade Georgina, Odaibo Azuka, Okwuraiwe Zaidat, Musa Philippe, Chebu Oliver, Ezechi Oche, Agbaji David, Olaleye Jay, Samuel Ibrahim, Dalhatu Mukhtar, Ahmed Joshua, DeVos Chunfu, Yang Elliot, Raizes Beth, Chaplin Phyllis, Kanki Emmanuel, Idigbe Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test |
title | Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test |
title_full | Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test |
title_fullStr | Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test |
title_full_unstemmed | Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test |
title_short | Genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available HIV-1 drug resistance test |
title_sort | genotyping performance evaluation of commercially available hiv-1 drug resistance test |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29953436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosemaryaudu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT chikaonwuamah genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT jonathanokpokwu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT godwinimade genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT georginaodaibo genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT azukaokwuraiwe genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT zaidatmusa genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT philippechebu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT oliverezechi genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT ocheagbaji genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT davidolaleye genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT jaysamuel genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT ibrahimdalhatu genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT mukhtarahmed genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT joshuadevos genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT chunfuyang genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT elliotraizes genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT bethchaplin genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT phylliskanki genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest AT emmanuelidigbe genotypingperformanceevaluationofcommerciallyavailablehiv1drugresistancetest |