Cargando…
Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction
OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve-in-valve implantation for prosthetic valve dysfunction is a good alternative to reoperative valve replacement. There are some limitations to this approach including the risk of coronary occlusion, patient prosthesis mismatch, and valve malposition. The incidence of coronary o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000500 |
_version_ | 1783335897714917376 |
---|---|
author | Cheung, Anson W. Ye, Jian Dvir, Danny Wood, David A. Webb, John G. |
author_facet | Cheung, Anson W. Ye, Jian Dvir, Danny Wood, David A. Webb, John G. |
author_sort | Cheung, Anson W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve-in-valve implantation for prosthetic valve dysfunction is a good alternative to reoperative valve replacement. There are some limitations to this approach including the risk of coronary occlusion, patient prosthesis mismatch, and valve malposition. The incidence of coronary occlusion is higher in aortic valve-in-valve than de novo aortic stenosis cases. Multiple factors can contribute to this complication, and the type of bioprosthesis has been implicated. METHODS: We examined our experience of 80 aortic valve-in-valve cases with internally and externally mounted leaflet valves. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 95% of cases with an overall 30-day mortality of 1.3%. Clinical and procedural outcomes were similar in the both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that aortic valve-in-valve implantation can be safely performed in carefully selected patient with internally and externally mounted leaflet bioprosthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6023587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60235872018-07-11 Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction Cheung, Anson W. Ye, Jian Dvir, Danny Wood, David A. Webb, John G. Innovations (Phila) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve-in-valve implantation for prosthetic valve dysfunction is a good alternative to reoperative valve replacement. There are some limitations to this approach including the risk of coronary occlusion, patient prosthesis mismatch, and valve malposition. The incidence of coronary occlusion is higher in aortic valve-in-valve than de novo aortic stenosis cases. Multiple factors can contribute to this complication, and the type of bioprosthesis has been implicated. METHODS: We examined our experience of 80 aortic valve-in-valve cases with internally and externally mounted leaflet valves. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 95% of cases with an overall 30-day mortality of 1.3%. Clinical and procedural outcomes were similar in the both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that aortic valve-in-valve implantation can be safely performed in carefully selected patient with internally and externally mounted leaflet bioprosthesis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6023587/ /pubmed/29912738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000500 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cheung, Anson W. Ye, Jian Dvir, Danny Wood, David A. Webb, John G. Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction |
title | Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction |
title_full | Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction |
title_fullStr | Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction |
title_full_unstemmed | Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction |
title_short | Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction |
title_sort | aortic valve-in-valve in externally mounted bioprosthesis: a safe treatment option for bioprosthetic structural valve dysfunction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheungansonw aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction AT yejian aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction AT dvirdanny aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction AT wooddavida aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction AT webbjohng aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction |