Cargando…

Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve-in-valve implantation for prosthetic valve dysfunction is a good alternative to reoperative valve replacement. There are some limitations to this approach including the risk of coronary occlusion, patient prosthesis mismatch, and valve malposition. The incidence of coronary o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheung, Anson W., Ye, Jian, Dvir, Danny, Wood, David A., Webb, John G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000500
_version_ 1783335897714917376
author Cheung, Anson W.
Ye, Jian
Dvir, Danny
Wood, David A.
Webb, John G.
author_facet Cheung, Anson W.
Ye, Jian
Dvir, Danny
Wood, David A.
Webb, John G.
author_sort Cheung, Anson W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve-in-valve implantation for prosthetic valve dysfunction is a good alternative to reoperative valve replacement. There are some limitations to this approach including the risk of coronary occlusion, patient prosthesis mismatch, and valve malposition. The incidence of coronary occlusion is higher in aortic valve-in-valve than de novo aortic stenosis cases. Multiple factors can contribute to this complication, and the type of bioprosthesis has been implicated. METHODS: We examined our experience of 80 aortic valve-in-valve cases with internally and externally mounted leaflet valves. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 95% of cases with an overall 30-day mortality of 1.3%. Clinical and procedural outcomes were similar in the both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that aortic valve-in-valve implantation can be safely performed in carefully selected patient with internally and externally mounted leaflet bioprosthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6023587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60235872018-07-11 Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction Cheung, Anson W. Ye, Jian Dvir, Danny Wood, David A. Webb, John G. Innovations (Phila) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve-in-valve implantation for prosthetic valve dysfunction is a good alternative to reoperative valve replacement. There are some limitations to this approach including the risk of coronary occlusion, patient prosthesis mismatch, and valve malposition. The incidence of coronary occlusion is higher in aortic valve-in-valve than de novo aortic stenosis cases. Multiple factors can contribute to this complication, and the type of bioprosthesis has been implicated. METHODS: We examined our experience of 80 aortic valve-in-valve cases with internally and externally mounted leaflet valves. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 95% of cases with an overall 30-day mortality of 1.3%. Clinical and procedural outcomes were similar in the both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that aortic valve-in-valve implantation can be safely performed in carefully selected patient with internally and externally mounted leaflet bioprosthesis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6023587/ /pubmed/29912738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000500 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cheung, Anson W.
Ye, Jian
Dvir, Danny
Wood, David A.
Webb, John G.
Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction
title Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction
title_full Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction
title_fullStr Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction
title_short Aortic Valve-in-Valve in Externally Mounted Bioprosthesis: A Safe Treatment Option for Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Dysfunction
title_sort aortic valve-in-valve in externally mounted bioprosthesis: a safe treatment option for bioprosthetic structural valve dysfunction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000500
work_keys_str_mv AT cheungansonw aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction
AT yejian aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction
AT dvirdanny aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction
AT wooddavida aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction
AT webbjohng aorticvalveinvalveinexternallymountedbioprosthesisasafetreatmentoptionforbioprostheticstructuralvalvedysfunction