Cargando…

Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study

BACKGROUND: It is very rare but challenging to perform emergency airway management for accidental extubation in a patient whose head and neck are fixed in the prone position when urgently turning the patient to the supine position would be unsafe. The authors hypothesized that tracheal intubation wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oshika, Hiroyuki, Koyama, Yukihide, Taguri, Masataka, Maruyama, Koichi, Hirabayashi, Go, Yamada, Shoko Merrit, Kohno, Masashi, Andoh, Tomio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011190
_version_ 1783335917034930176
author Oshika, Hiroyuki
Koyama, Yukihide
Taguri, Masataka
Maruyama, Koichi
Hirabayashi, Go
Yamada, Shoko Merrit
Kohno, Masashi
Andoh, Tomio
author_facet Oshika, Hiroyuki
Koyama, Yukihide
Taguri, Masataka
Maruyama, Koichi
Hirabayashi, Go
Yamada, Shoko Merrit
Kohno, Masashi
Andoh, Tomio
author_sort Oshika, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is very rare but challenging to perform emergency airway management for accidental extubation in a patient whose head and neck are fixed in the prone position when urgently turning the patient to the supine position would be unsafe. The authors hypothesized that tracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscope would allow effective airway rescue in this situation compared with a supraglottic airway device and designed a randomized crossover manikin study to test this hypothesis. METHODS: The authors compared airway rescue performances of the 3 devices—the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA; Teleflex Medical, Westmeath, Ireland) as a reference; the Pentax AWS (AWS; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) as a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope; and the McGRATH videolaryngoscope (McGRATH; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) as a nonchanneled blade type in a manikin fixed to the operating table in the prone position. Twenty-one anesthesiologists performed airway management on the prone manikin with the 3 devices, and the time required for intubation/ventilation and the success rates were recorded. RESULTS: The median (range) intubation/ventilation times with the PLMA, AWS, and McGRATH were 24.5 (13.5–89.5) s, 29.9 (17.1–79.8) s, and 46.7 (21.9–211.7) s, respectively. There was no significant difference in intubation/ventilation times between the PLMA and AWS. The AWS permitted significantly faster tracheal intubation than did the McGRATH (P = 0.006). The success rates with the PLMA (100%) and AWS (100%) were significantly greater than that with the McGRATH (71.4%). Airway management performance of the PLMA and AWS was comparable between devices and better than that of the McGRATH in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that tracheal intubation can provide a more secure airway and more stable ventilation than the PLMA, re-intubation with a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope such as the AWS may be a useful method of airway rescue for accidental extubation in patients in the prone position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6023683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60236832018-07-03 Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study Oshika, Hiroyuki Koyama, Yukihide Taguri, Masataka Maruyama, Koichi Hirabayashi, Go Yamada, Shoko Merrit Kohno, Masashi Andoh, Tomio Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: It is very rare but challenging to perform emergency airway management for accidental extubation in a patient whose head and neck are fixed in the prone position when urgently turning the patient to the supine position would be unsafe. The authors hypothesized that tracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscope would allow effective airway rescue in this situation compared with a supraglottic airway device and designed a randomized crossover manikin study to test this hypothesis. METHODS: The authors compared airway rescue performances of the 3 devices—the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA; Teleflex Medical, Westmeath, Ireland) as a reference; the Pentax AWS (AWS; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) as a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope; and the McGRATH videolaryngoscope (McGRATH; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) as a nonchanneled blade type in a manikin fixed to the operating table in the prone position. Twenty-one anesthesiologists performed airway management on the prone manikin with the 3 devices, and the time required for intubation/ventilation and the success rates were recorded. RESULTS: The median (range) intubation/ventilation times with the PLMA, AWS, and McGRATH were 24.5 (13.5–89.5) s, 29.9 (17.1–79.8) s, and 46.7 (21.9–211.7) s, respectively. There was no significant difference in intubation/ventilation times between the PLMA and AWS. The AWS permitted significantly faster tracheal intubation than did the McGRATH (P = 0.006). The success rates with the PLMA (100%) and AWS (100%) were significantly greater than that with the McGRATH (71.4%). Airway management performance of the PLMA and AWS was comparable between devices and better than that of the McGRATH in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that tracheal intubation can provide a more secure airway and more stable ventilation than the PLMA, re-intubation with a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope such as the AWS may be a useful method of airway rescue for accidental extubation in patients in the prone position. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6023683/ /pubmed/29924038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011190 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Oshika, Hiroyuki
Koyama, Yukihide
Taguri, Masataka
Maruyama, Koichi
Hirabayashi, Go
Yamada, Shoko Merrit
Kohno, Masashi
Andoh, Tomio
Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study
title Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_full Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_fullStr Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_full_unstemmed Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_short Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_sort supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: a randomized crossover manikin study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011190
work_keys_str_mv AT oshikahiroyuki supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT koyamayukihide supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT tagurimasataka supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT maruyamakoichi supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT hirabayashigo supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT yamadashokomerrit supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT kohnomasashi supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT andohtomio supraglotticairwaydeviceversusachanneledornonchanneledbladetypevideolaryngoscopeforaccidentalextubationinthepronepositionarandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy