Cargando…

Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Leukosan SkinLink (LS), which combines non-woven textile strips and tissue adhesive, offers the advantage of atraumatic treatment while effectively shortening the procedure time. We hypothesized that wound closure would be faster with LS than with surgical suture (SS) and the wound infec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyeongtae, Kim, Wonhee, Kang, Gu Hyun, Jang, Yong Soo, Choi, Hyun Young, Kim, Jae Guk, Kim, In Young, Kim, Minji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29923977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010918
_version_ 1783335917508886528
author Kim, Hyeongtae
Kim, Wonhee
Kang, Gu Hyun
Jang, Yong Soo
Choi, Hyun Young
Kim, Jae Guk
Kim, In Young
Kim, Minji
author_facet Kim, Hyeongtae
Kim, Wonhee
Kang, Gu Hyun
Jang, Yong Soo
Choi, Hyun Young
Kim, Jae Guk
Kim, In Young
Kim, Minji
author_sort Kim, Hyeongtae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Leukosan SkinLink (LS), which combines non-woven textile strips and tissue adhesive, offers the advantage of atraumatic treatment while effectively shortening the procedure time. We hypothesized that wound closure would be faster with LS than with surgical suture (SS) and the wound infection and dehiscence would be similar. METHODS: A prospective, open label, single-center, randomized controlled trial was performed. Between November 2014 and April 2016, 49 patients with traumatic lacerations who presented to the emergency department were eligible for study inclusion. RESULTS: The mean wound closure time was significantly lower in the LS group than in the SS group (1.48 ± 0.2 seconds vs 8.8 ± 3.6 minutes, P < .001). After adjusting the wound closure time according to the lacerations length, the time remained significantly lower in the LS group than in the SS group (1.0 ± 0.8 seconds vs 5.03 ± 2.5minutes, P < .001). During follow-up for 14 days, no significant differences in dehiscence and wound infection were observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Wound closure was approximately 4minutes faster with LS and there were no differences in wound infection and dehiscence rates. Thus, the LS could be used as a timesaving suture technique for acute traumatic lacerations in emergency department (ED). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02333877
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6023685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60236852018-07-03 Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial Kim, Hyeongtae Kim, Wonhee Kang, Gu Hyun Jang, Yong Soo Choi, Hyun Young Kim, Jae Guk Kim, In Young Kim, Minji Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Leukosan SkinLink (LS), which combines non-woven textile strips and tissue adhesive, offers the advantage of atraumatic treatment while effectively shortening the procedure time. We hypothesized that wound closure would be faster with LS than with surgical suture (SS) and the wound infection and dehiscence would be similar. METHODS: A prospective, open label, single-center, randomized controlled trial was performed. Between November 2014 and April 2016, 49 patients with traumatic lacerations who presented to the emergency department were eligible for study inclusion. RESULTS: The mean wound closure time was significantly lower in the LS group than in the SS group (1.48 ± 0.2 seconds vs 8.8 ± 3.6 minutes, P < .001). After adjusting the wound closure time according to the lacerations length, the time remained significantly lower in the LS group than in the SS group (1.0 ± 0.8 seconds vs 5.03 ± 2.5minutes, P < .001). During follow-up for 14 days, no significant differences in dehiscence and wound infection were observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Wound closure was approximately 4minutes faster with LS and there were no differences in wound infection and dehiscence rates. Thus, the LS could be used as a timesaving suture technique for acute traumatic lacerations in emergency department (ED). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02333877 Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6023685/ /pubmed/29923977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010918 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Hyeongtae
Kim, Wonhee
Kang, Gu Hyun
Jang, Yong Soo
Choi, Hyun Young
Kim, Jae Guk
Kim, In Young
Kim, Minji
Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of leukosan skinlink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29923977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010918
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyeongtae comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimwonhee comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kangguhyun comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jangyongsoo comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choihyunyoung comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimjaeguk comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kiminyoung comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimminji comparisonofleukosanskinlinkwithsurgicalsuturefortraumaticlacerationrepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial