Cargando…
Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
BACKGROUND: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabiliser of the patella and thus mostly reconstructed in the surgical treatment of patellofemoral dislocation. The aims of this study were to gain a better understanding of the influence of altered MPFL graft-fixation locations and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29956015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-018-0140-x |
_version_ | 1783335933358112768 |
---|---|
author | Dornacher, Daniel Lippacher, Sabine Nelitz, Manfred Reichel, Heiko Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin |
author_facet | Dornacher, Daniel Lippacher, Sabine Nelitz, Manfred Reichel, Heiko Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin |
author_sort | Dornacher, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabiliser of the patella and thus mostly reconstructed in the surgical treatment of patellofemoral dislocation. The aims of this study were to gain a better understanding of the influence of altered MPFL graft-fixation locations and different graft pre-tensions on patellofemoral contact pressure. METHODS: Six human cadaveric knee joints were placed in a six-degree-of-freedom knee simulator. Mean PFCP (mPFCP) was evaluated in knee flexion of 0, 30 and 90° using a calibrated pressure-measurement system. After data assessment of the native knee joint, five MPFL reconstruction conditions were conducted: Anatomical double bundle; non-anatomical proximal patellar; non-anatomical distal patellar; non-anatomical proximal femoral; non-anatomical ventral femoral. The gracilis graft was fixed at a defined knee flexion of 30° and pre-tensioned to 2, 10 and 20 N. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis testing resulted in no mPFCP differences between the native and anatomical reconstruction states. Comparing the native and anatomical reconstruction states with the non-anatomical reconstruction states, no difference in the mPFCP both in knee extension (0°) (p>0.366) and in 30° knee flexion (p>0.349) was found. At 90° knee flexion, the following differences were identified: compared to the native knee state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral and non-anatomical ventral femoral reconstruction by 257% (p=0.04) and 292% (p=0.016), respectively. Compared to the anatomical reconstruction state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral reconstruction by 199% (p=0.042). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: With respect to all study findings and to restore a physiological PFCP, we recommend using the anatomical footprints for MPFL reconstruction and a moderate graft pretensioning of 2-10 N. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6023804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60238042018-07-13 Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees Dornacher, Daniel Lippacher, Sabine Nelitz, Manfred Reichel, Heiko Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabiliser of the patella and thus mostly reconstructed in the surgical treatment of patellofemoral dislocation. The aims of this study were to gain a better understanding of the influence of altered MPFL graft-fixation locations and different graft pre-tensions on patellofemoral contact pressure. METHODS: Six human cadaveric knee joints were placed in a six-degree-of-freedom knee simulator. Mean PFCP (mPFCP) was evaluated in knee flexion of 0, 30 and 90° using a calibrated pressure-measurement system. After data assessment of the native knee joint, five MPFL reconstruction conditions were conducted: Anatomical double bundle; non-anatomical proximal patellar; non-anatomical distal patellar; non-anatomical proximal femoral; non-anatomical ventral femoral. The gracilis graft was fixed at a defined knee flexion of 30° and pre-tensioned to 2, 10 and 20 N. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis testing resulted in no mPFCP differences between the native and anatomical reconstruction states. Comparing the native and anatomical reconstruction states with the non-anatomical reconstruction states, no difference in the mPFCP both in knee extension (0°) (p>0.366) and in 30° knee flexion (p>0.349) was found. At 90° knee flexion, the following differences were identified: compared to the native knee state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral and non-anatomical ventral femoral reconstruction by 257% (p=0.04) and 292% (p=0.016), respectively. Compared to the anatomical reconstruction state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral reconstruction by 199% (p=0.042). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: With respect to all study findings and to restore a physiological PFCP, we recommend using the anatomical footprints for MPFL reconstruction and a moderate graft pretensioning of 2-10 N. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6023804/ /pubmed/29956015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-018-0140-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Dornacher, Daniel Lippacher, Sabine Nelitz, Manfred Reichel, Heiko Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees |
title | Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees |
title_full | Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees |
title_fullStr | Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees |
title_short | Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees |
title_sort | impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29956015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-018-0140-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dornacherdaniel impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees AT lippachersabine impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees AT nelitzmanfred impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees AT reichelheiko impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees AT ignatiusanita impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees AT durselenlutz impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees AT seitzandreasmartin impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees |