Cargando…

Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees

BACKGROUND: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabiliser of the patella and thus mostly reconstructed in the surgical treatment of patellofemoral dislocation. The aims of this study were to gain a better understanding of the influence of altered MPFL graft-fixation locations and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dornacher, Daniel, Lippacher, Sabine, Nelitz, Manfred, Reichel, Heiko, Ignatius, Anita, Dürselen, Lutz, Seitz, Andreas Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29956015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-018-0140-x
_version_ 1783335933358112768
author Dornacher, Daniel
Lippacher, Sabine
Nelitz, Manfred
Reichel, Heiko
Ignatius, Anita
Dürselen, Lutz
Seitz, Andreas Martin
author_facet Dornacher, Daniel
Lippacher, Sabine
Nelitz, Manfred
Reichel, Heiko
Ignatius, Anita
Dürselen, Lutz
Seitz, Andreas Martin
author_sort Dornacher, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabiliser of the patella and thus mostly reconstructed in the surgical treatment of patellofemoral dislocation. The aims of this study were to gain a better understanding of the influence of altered MPFL graft-fixation locations and different graft pre-tensions on patellofemoral contact pressure. METHODS: Six human cadaveric knee joints were placed in a six-degree-of-freedom knee simulator. Mean PFCP (mPFCP) was evaluated in knee flexion of 0, 30 and 90° using a calibrated pressure-measurement system. After data assessment of the native knee joint, five MPFL reconstruction conditions were conducted: Anatomical double bundle; non-anatomical proximal patellar; non-anatomical distal patellar; non-anatomical proximal femoral; non-anatomical ventral femoral. The gracilis graft was fixed at a defined knee flexion of 30° and pre-tensioned to 2, 10 and 20 N. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis testing resulted in no mPFCP differences between the native and anatomical reconstruction states. Comparing the native and anatomical reconstruction states with the non-anatomical reconstruction states, no difference in the mPFCP both in knee extension (0°) (p>0.366) and in 30° knee flexion (p>0.349) was found. At 90° knee flexion, the following differences were identified: compared to the native knee state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral and non-anatomical ventral femoral reconstruction by 257% (p=0.04) and 292% (p=0.016), respectively. Compared to the anatomical reconstruction state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral reconstruction by 199% (p=0.042). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: With respect to all study findings and to restore a physiological PFCP, we recommend using the anatomical footprints for MPFL reconstruction and a moderate graft pretensioning of 2-10 N.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6023804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60238042018-07-13 Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees Dornacher, Daniel Lippacher, Sabine Nelitz, Manfred Reichel, Heiko Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Seitz, Andreas Martin J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main stabiliser of the patella and thus mostly reconstructed in the surgical treatment of patellofemoral dislocation. The aims of this study were to gain a better understanding of the influence of altered MPFL graft-fixation locations and different graft pre-tensions on patellofemoral contact pressure. METHODS: Six human cadaveric knee joints were placed in a six-degree-of-freedom knee simulator. Mean PFCP (mPFCP) was evaluated in knee flexion of 0, 30 and 90° using a calibrated pressure-measurement system. After data assessment of the native knee joint, five MPFL reconstruction conditions were conducted: Anatomical double bundle; non-anatomical proximal patellar; non-anatomical distal patellar; non-anatomical proximal femoral; non-anatomical ventral femoral. The gracilis graft was fixed at a defined knee flexion of 30° and pre-tensioned to 2, 10 and 20 N. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis testing resulted in no mPFCP differences between the native and anatomical reconstruction states. Comparing the native and anatomical reconstruction states with the non-anatomical reconstruction states, no difference in the mPFCP both in knee extension (0°) (p>0.366) and in 30° knee flexion (p>0.349) was found. At 90° knee flexion, the following differences were identified: compared to the native knee state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral and non-anatomical ventral femoral reconstruction by 257% (p=0.04) and 292% (p=0.016), respectively. Compared to the anatomical reconstruction state, the mPFCP increased after non-anatomical proximal femoral reconstruction by 199% (p=0.042). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: With respect to all study findings and to restore a physiological PFCP, we recommend using the anatomical footprints for MPFL reconstruction and a moderate graft pretensioning of 2-10 N. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6023804/ /pubmed/29956015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-018-0140-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Dornacher, Daniel
Lippacher, Sabine
Nelitz, Manfred
Reichel, Heiko
Ignatius, Anita
Dürselen, Lutz
Seitz, Andreas Martin
Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
title Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
title_full Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
title_fullStr Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
title_full_unstemmed Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
title_short Impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
title_sort impact of five different medial patellofemoral ligament-reconstruction strategies and three different graft pre-tensioning states on the mean patellofemoral contact pressure: a biomechanical study on human cadaver knees
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29956015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-018-0140-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dornacherdaniel impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees
AT lippachersabine impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees
AT nelitzmanfred impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees
AT reichelheiko impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees
AT ignatiusanita impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees
AT durselenlutz impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees
AT seitzandreasmartin impactoffivedifferentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionstrategiesandthreedifferentgraftpretensioningstatesonthemeanpatellofemoralcontactpressureabiomechanicalstudyonhumancadaverknees