Cargando…

Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study

OBJECTIVES: The role of alloplastic materials in maxillofacial reconstruction is still controversial. Determining the utility of porous, high-density, polyethylene implants as a highly stable and flexible, porous alloplast, with properties such as rapid vascularization and tissue ingrowth, is crucia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khorasani, Mansour, Janbaz, Pejman, Rayati, Farshid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963494
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.3.128
_version_ 1783335987026329600
author Khorasani, Mansour
Janbaz, Pejman
Rayati, Farshid
author_facet Khorasani, Mansour
Janbaz, Pejman
Rayati, Farshid
author_sort Khorasani, Mansour
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The role of alloplastic materials in maxillofacial reconstruction is still controversial. Determining the utility of porous, high-density, polyethylene implants as a highly stable and flexible, porous alloplast, with properties such as rapid vascularization and tissue ingrowth, is crucial in cases of maxillofacial deformities and aesthetic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty high-density porous polyethylene implants were implanted in 16 patients that had been referred to a private office over a three-year period. These implants were used for correcting congenital deformities, posttraumatic defects and improving the aesthetic in nasal, paranasal, malar, chin, mandibular angle, body and orbital areas. RESULTS: The outcomes of the cases in this study showed good aesthetic and functional results. The majority of patients had no signs of discomfort, rejection or exposure. Two implants suffered complications: a complicated malar implant was managed by antibiotic therapy, and an infected mandibular angle implant was removed despite antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, the Medpor implant seems to be an excellent biomaterial for correcting various facial deformities. Advantages include its versatility and relatively ideal pore size that allows for excellent soft tissue ingrowth and coverage. It is strong, flexible and easy to shape.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60240642018-06-29 Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study Khorasani, Mansour Janbaz, Pejman Rayati, Farshid J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The role of alloplastic materials in maxillofacial reconstruction is still controversial. Determining the utility of porous, high-density, polyethylene implants as a highly stable and flexible, porous alloplast, with properties such as rapid vascularization and tissue ingrowth, is crucial in cases of maxillofacial deformities and aesthetic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty high-density porous polyethylene implants were implanted in 16 patients that had been referred to a private office over a three-year period. These implants were used for correcting congenital deformities, posttraumatic defects and improving the aesthetic in nasal, paranasal, malar, chin, mandibular angle, body and orbital areas. RESULTS: The outcomes of the cases in this study showed good aesthetic and functional results. The majority of patients had no signs of discomfort, rejection or exposure. Two implants suffered complications: a complicated malar implant was managed by antibiotic therapy, and an infected mandibular angle implant was removed despite antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, the Medpor implant seems to be an excellent biomaterial for correcting various facial deformities. Advantages include its versatility and relatively ideal pore size that allows for excellent soft tissue ingrowth and coverage. It is strong, flexible and easy to shape. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2018-06 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6024064/ /pubmed/29963494 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.3.128 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khorasani, Mansour
Janbaz, Pejman
Rayati, Farshid
Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study
title Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study
title_full Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study
title_fullStr Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study
title_full_unstemmed Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study
title_short Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study
title_sort maxillofacial reconstruction with medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963494
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.3.128
work_keys_str_mv AT khorasanimansour maxillofacialreconstructionwithmedporporouspolyethyleneimplantacaseseriesstudy
AT janbazpejman maxillofacialreconstructionwithmedporporouspolyethyleneimplantacaseseriesstudy
AT rayatifarshid maxillofacialreconstructionwithmedporporouspolyethyleneimplantacaseseriesstudy