Cargando…

Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?

Patients with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer are at continuous risk of relapse even after more than 10 years of follow up. Currently, no biomarker that identifies patients for early versus late recurrence, or one that selects patients or tumors for longer versus shorter durations of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munzone, Elisabetta, Colleoni, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918777437
_version_ 1783336028567764992
author Munzone, Elisabetta
Colleoni, Marco
author_facet Munzone, Elisabetta
Colleoni, Marco
author_sort Munzone, Elisabetta
collection PubMed
description Patients with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer are at continuous risk of relapse even after more than 10 years of follow up. Currently, no biomarker that identifies patients for early versus late recurrence, or one that selects patients or tumors for longer versus shorter durations of endocrine therapy (ET) is available and a crucial question is how to properly select patients who could be spared extended ET or those who require it. In the last 20 years more than 40,000 women were enrolled in randomized trials to answer the question of optimal duration of ET. According to the results of these studies extended adjuvant ET is more effective than standard 5 years of adjuvant ET. Extended ET in patients who remain premenopausal after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen is still tamoxifen for another 5 years. Extended ET with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) should be offered to postmenopausal women with substantial residual risk of relapse after completing 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. Extension of AI treatment to 10 years resulted in significantly better 5-year disease-free survival including disease recurrence local/distant or the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer events. Currently, new therapeutic targets are under investigation, but the beneficial effect of prolonged treatment for high-risk patients, identified by using multigenomic tests, remains unclear. Thus, further studies need to be performed to confirm the advantage of extended adjuvant ET in selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60242812018-07-05 Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough? Munzone, Elisabetta Colleoni, Marco Ther Adv Med Oncol Review Patients with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer are at continuous risk of relapse even after more than 10 years of follow up. Currently, no biomarker that identifies patients for early versus late recurrence, or one that selects patients or tumors for longer versus shorter durations of endocrine therapy (ET) is available and a crucial question is how to properly select patients who could be spared extended ET or those who require it. In the last 20 years more than 40,000 women were enrolled in randomized trials to answer the question of optimal duration of ET. According to the results of these studies extended adjuvant ET is more effective than standard 5 years of adjuvant ET. Extended ET in patients who remain premenopausal after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen is still tamoxifen for another 5 years. Extended ET with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) should be offered to postmenopausal women with substantial residual risk of relapse after completing 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. Extension of AI treatment to 10 years resulted in significantly better 5-year disease-free survival including disease recurrence local/distant or the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer events. Currently, new therapeutic targets are under investigation, but the beneficial effect of prolonged treatment for high-risk patients, identified by using multigenomic tests, remains unclear. Thus, further studies need to be performed to confirm the advantage of extended adjuvant ET in selected patients. SAGE Publications 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6024281/ /pubmed/29977350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918777437 Text en © The Author(s), 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Munzone, Elisabetta
Colleoni, Marco
Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?
title Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?
title_full Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?
title_fullStr Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?
title_full_unstemmed Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?
title_short Optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?
title_sort optimal management of luminal breast cancer: how much endocrine therapy is long enough?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835918777437
work_keys_str_mv AT munzoneelisabetta optimalmanagementofluminalbreastcancerhowmuchendocrinetherapyislongenough
AT colleonimarco optimalmanagementofluminalbreastcancerhowmuchendocrinetherapyislongenough