Cargando…

Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study

INTRODUCTION: Assessments of the range of motion (ROM) in human joints have been widely used to evaluate the joint condition. Although maker based motion capture system is the most popular and practical method in the clinical field, there have been limitations such as the relatively long time requir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Hongmin, Joo, Seongsu, Kim, Jinyoung, Kim, Jae Kyoun, Kim, Cheolhyun, Seo, Jihye, Kang, Dae Gill, Lee, Ho Sub, Sung, Kang-Keyng, Lee, Sangkwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011082
_version_ 1783336060798894080
author Chu, Hongmin
Joo, Seongsu
Kim, Jinyoung
Kim, Jae Kyoun
Kim, Cheolhyun
Seo, Jihye
Kang, Dae Gill
Lee, Ho Sub
Sung, Kang-Keyng
Lee, Sangkwan
author_facet Chu, Hongmin
Joo, Seongsu
Kim, Jinyoung
Kim, Jae Kyoun
Kim, Cheolhyun
Seo, Jihye
Kang, Dae Gill
Lee, Ho Sub
Sung, Kang-Keyng
Lee, Sangkwan
author_sort Chu, Hongmin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Assessments of the range of motion (ROM) in human joints have been widely used to evaluate the joint condition. Although maker based motion capture system is the most popular and practical method in the clinical field, there have been limitations such as the relatively long time required in procedure or influence of attached markers on natural movement. Recently, markerless motion capture systems have been actively developed due to their relatively lower cost and convenience for installation. The POM-Checker (Team Elysium Inc., Seoul, Rep of Korea), a markerless motion capture system, was developed with new algorithms to assess the ROM in human joints. However, the measure of the POM-Checker has not been compared with a golden-standard device in evaluating the ROM in the human joints. So we developed a protocol to evaluate the validation and reliability of the POM-Checker in measuring the shoulder ROM. This study will also provide a standard procedure to measure the shoulder ROM with the POM-Checker and 3D motion analysis system simultaneously. METHODS/DESIGN: This protocol is for a single institution comparative study to evaluate the validity and reliability of POM-Checker. Six participants will be recruited. We will measure the angles of shoulder abduction and flexion with POM-Checker and 3D motion analysis system simultaneously. The primary outcome is the angles of shoulder abduction and flexion. DISCUSSION: This will be the first study to analyze the validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder ROM. Although the sample size of this study is small, it may not influence on the results conclusively, because the measures are very precise numerical angles. Furthermore, the angles of shoulder movements will be measured with both devices simultaneously. CONCLUSION: The results of the study will be helpful to find out the validity and reliability of a new developed ROM measure device, POM-Checker, by comparison with a golden standard system, 3D motion capture system, in measuring the shoulder ROM. It will also contribute to use of the POM-Checker in measuring the ROMs in many human joints
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60244692018-07-03 Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study Chu, Hongmin Joo, Seongsu Kim, Jinyoung Kim, Jae Kyoun Kim, Cheolhyun Seo, Jihye Kang, Dae Gill Lee, Ho Sub Sung, Kang-Keyng Lee, Sangkwan Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article INTRODUCTION: Assessments of the range of motion (ROM) in human joints have been widely used to evaluate the joint condition. Although maker based motion capture system is the most popular and practical method in the clinical field, there have been limitations such as the relatively long time required in procedure or influence of attached markers on natural movement. Recently, markerless motion capture systems have been actively developed due to their relatively lower cost and convenience for installation. The POM-Checker (Team Elysium Inc., Seoul, Rep of Korea), a markerless motion capture system, was developed with new algorithms to assess the ROM in human joints. However, the measure of the POM-Checker has not been compared with a golden-standard device in evaluating the ROM in the human joints. So we developed a protocol to evaluate the validation and reliability of the POM-Checker in measuring the shoulder ROM. This study will also provide a standard procedure to measure the shoulder ROM with the POM-Checker and 3D motion analysis system simultaneously. METHODS/DESIGN: This protocol is for a single institution comparative study to evaluate the validity and reliability of POM-Checker. Six participants will be recruited. We will measure the angles of shoulder abduction and flexion with POM-Checker and 3D motion analysis system simultaneously. The primary outcome is the angles of shoulder abduction and flexion. DISCUSSION: This will be the first study to analyze the validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder ROM. Although the sample size of this study is small, it may not influence on the results conclusively, because the measures are very precise numerical angles. Furthermore, the angles of shoulder movements will be measured with both devices simultaneously. CONCLUSION: The results of the study will be helpful to find out the validity and reliability of a new developed ROM measure device, POM-Checker, by comparison with a golden standard system, 3D motion capture system, in measuring the shoulder ROM. It will also contribute to use of the POM-Checker in measuring the ROMs in many human joints Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6024469/ /pubmed/29924001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011082 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Chu, Hongmin
Joo, Seongsu
Kim, Jinyoung
Kim, Jae Kyoun
Kim, Cheolhyun
Seo, Jihye
Kang, Dae Gill
Lee, Ho Sub
Sung, Kang-Keyng
Lee, Sangkwan
Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study
title Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study
title_full Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study
title_short Validity and reliability of POM-Checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: Protocol for a single center comparative study
title_sort validity and reliability of pom-checker in measuring shoulder range of motion: protocol for a single center comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011082
work_keys_str_mv AT chuhongmin validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT jooseongsu validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT kimjinyoung validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT kimjaekyoun validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT kimcheolhyun validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT seojihye validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT kangdaegill validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT leehosub validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT sungkangkeyng validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy
AT leesangkwan validityandreliabilityofpomcheckerinmeasuringshoulderrangeofmotionprotocolforasinglecentercomparativestudy