Cargando…
Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study
BACKGROUND: Vascular-derived progenitor and endothelial cell populations (CD31, CD34, CD146) are capable of multipotent differentiation at the site of injured ligamentous tissue to aid in the intrinsic healing response. Proximal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have been reported to have better...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118777825 |
_version_ | 1783336078217838592 |
---|---|
author | Frangiamore, Salvatore J. Morris, Elizabeth R. Scibetta, Alex C. Chahla, Jorge Moatshe, Gilbert Civitarese, David Provencher, Matthew T. Hackett, Thomas R. Schickendantz, Mark S. Huard, Johnny LaPrade, Robert F. |
author_facet | Frangiamore, Salvatore J. Morris, Elizabeth R. Scibetta, Alex C. Chahla, Jorge Moatshe, Gilbert Civitarese, David Provencher, Matthew T. Hackett, Thomas R. Schickendantz, Mark S. Huard, Johnny LaPrade, Robert F. |
author_sort | Frangiamore, Salvatore J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vascular-derived progenitor and endothelial cell populations (CD31, CD34, CD146) are capable of multipotent differentiation at the site of injured ligamentous tissue to aid in the intrinsic healing response. Proximal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have been reported to have better healing capability when compared with distal UCL tears. PURPOSE: To compare the vascular composition of the proximal and distal insertions of the anterior bundle of the UCL of the elbow via known markers of endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cells (CD31, CD34, CD146). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: UCLs were harvested from 10 nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows and transected into proximal and distal portions. Endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell densities were assessed with 4 staining groups: CD31 (immunohistochemistry) and CD31/α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), CD34/α-SMA, and CD146/α-SMA (immunofluorescence). CD31 immunohistochemistry identified endothelial progenitor cells in the UCL. Later staining of the same slides with α-SMA demonstrated the relationship of progenitor cells to the surrounding vasculature. Fluorescent staining was quantified by calculating the proportion of positively stained nuclei versus the total number of nuclei in the proximal and distal UCL. RESULTS: CD31+ cells were present in the proximal and distal sections of all 10 UCLs. Fluorescent staining revealed no significant differences in the ratio of CD31 to total nuclei between the distal (median, 36% [range, 23%-53%]) and proximal UCL (39% [22%-56%]) (P = .432, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Similarly, no differences were seen between CD34 distal (39% [24%-64%]) and proximal regions (46% [28%-63%]) (P = .846, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) or CD146 distal (40% [12%-65%]) and proximal regions (40% [22%-51%]) (P ≥ .999, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: Analysis of UCL tissues demonstrated equal distributions of vascular endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell markers throughout the proximal and distal UCL. Unlike that of the medial collateral ligament of the knee, the microvascular composition of the proximal and distal UCL insertions was not different, suggesting a well-vascularized ligament throughout its course. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings investigate one of the possible contributors to UCL healing after injury, which may provide insight into operative and nonoperative management of UCL injuries in the future. This study also indicates that reasons other than differences in progenitor cell density alone may explain the clinical healing differences seen between proximal and distal UCL tears. A better understanding of the microvascular environment and associated blood supply is warranted to understand the healing capability of the UCL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6024543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60245432018-07-05 Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study Frangiamore, Salvatore J. Morris, Elizabeth R. Scibetta, Alex C. Chahla, Jorge Moatshe, Gilbert Civitarese, David Provencher, Matthew T. Hackett, Thomas R. Schickendantz, Mark S. Huard, Johnny LaPrade, Robert F. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Vascular-derived progenitor and endothelial cell populations (CD31, CD34, CD146) are capable of multipotent differentiation at the site of injured ligamentous tissue to aid in the intrinsic healing response. Proximal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have been reported to have better healing capability when compared with distal UCL tears. PURPOSE: To compare the vascular composition of the proximal and distal insertions of the anterior bundle of the UCL of the elbow via known markers of endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cells (CD31, CD34, CD146). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: UCLs were harvested from 10 nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows and transected into proximal and distal portions. Endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell densities were assessed with 4 staining groups: CD31 (immunohistochemistry) and CD31/α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), CD34/α-SMA, and CD146/α-SMA (immunofluorescence). CD31 immunohistochemistry identified endothelial progenitor cells in the UCL. Later staining of the same slides with α-SMA demonstrated the relationship of progenitor cells to the surrounding vasculature. Fluorescent staining was quantified by calculating the proportion of positively stained nuclei versus the total number of nuclei in the proximal and distal UCL. RESULTS: CD31+ cells were present in the proximal and distal sections of all 10 UCLs. Fluorescent staining revealed no significant differences in the ratio of CD31 to total nuclei between the distal (median, 36% [range, 23%-53%]) and proximal UCL (39% [22%-56%]) (P = .432, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Similarly, no differences were seen between CD34 distal (39% [24%-64%]) and proximal regions (46% [28%-63%]) (P = .846, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) or CD146 distal (40% [12%-65%]) and proximal regions (40% [22%-51%]) (P ≥ .999, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: Analysis of UCL tissues demonstrated equal distributions of vascular endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell markers throughout the proximal and distal UCL. Unlike that of the medial collateral ligament of the knee, the microvascular composition of the proximal and distal UCL insertions was not different, suggesting a well-vascularized ligament throughout its course. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings investigate one of the possible contributors to UCL healing after injury, which may provide insight into operative and nonoperative management of UCL injuries in the future. This study also indicates that reasons other than differences in progenitor cell density alone may explain the clinical healing differences seen between proximal and distal UCL tears. A better understanding of the microvascular environment and associated blood supply is warranted to understand the healing capability of the UCL. SAGE Publications 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6024543/ /pubmed/29977939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118777825 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Frangiamore, Salvatore J. Morris, Elizabeth R. Scibetta, Alex C. Chahla, Jorge Moatshe, Gilbert Civitarese, David Provencher, Matthew T. Hackett, Thomas R. Schickendantz, Mark S. Huard, Johnny LaPrade, Robert F. Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study |
title | Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | evaluation of endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell populations in the proximal and distal ucl of the elbow: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118777825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frangiamoresalvatorej evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT morriselizabethr evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT scibettaalexc evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT chahlajorge evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT moatshegilbert evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT civitaresedavid evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT provenchermatthewt evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT hackettthomasr evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT schickendantzmarks evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT huardjohnny evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy AT lapraderobertf evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy |