Cargando…

Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Vascular-derived progenitor and endothelial cell populations (CD31, CD34, CD146) are capable of multipotent differentiation at the site of injured ligamentous tissue to aid in the intrinsic healing response. Proximal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have been reported to have better...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frangiamore, Salvatore J., Morris, Elizabeth R., Scibetta, Alex C., Chahla, Jorge, Moatshe, Gilbert, Civitarese, David, Provencher, Matthew T., Hackett, Thomas R., Schickendantz, Mark S., Huard, Johnny, LaPrade, Robert F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118777825
_version_ 1783336078217838592
author Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
Morris, Elizabeth R.
Scibetta, Alex C.
Chahla, Jorge
Moatshe, Gilbert
Civitarese, David
Provencher, Matthew T.
Hackett, Thomas R.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
Huard, Johnny
LaPrade, Robert F.
author_facet Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
Morris, Elizabeth R.
Scibetta, Alex C.
Chahla, Jorge
Moatshe, Gilbert
Civitarese, David
Provencher, Matthew T.
Hackett, Thomas R.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
Huard, Johnny
LaPrade, Robert F.
author_sort Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vascular-derived progenitor and endothelial cell populations (CD31, CD34, CD146) are capable of multipotent differentiation at the site of injured ligamentous tissue to aid in the intrinsic healing response. Proximal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have been reported to have better healing capability when compared with distal UCL tears. PURPOSE: To compare the vascular composition of the proximal and distal insertions of the anterior bundle of the UCL of the elbow via known markers of endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cells (CD31, CD34, CD146). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: UCLs were harvested from 10 nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows and transected into proximal and distal portions. Endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell densities were assessed with 4 staining groups: CD31 (immunohistochemistry) and CD31/α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), CD34/α-SMA, and CD146/α-SMA (immunofluorescence). CD31 immunohistochemistry identified endothelial progenitor cells in the UCL. Later staining of the same slides with α-SMA demonstrated the relationship of progenitor cells to the surrounding vasculature. Fluorescent staining was quantified by calculating the proportion of positively stained nuclei versus the total number of nuclei in the proximal and distal UCL. RESULTS: CD31+ cells were present in the proximal and distal sections of all 10 UCLs. Fluorescent staining revealed no significant differences in the ratio of CD31 to total nuclei between the distal (median, 36% [range, 23%-53%]) and proximal UCL (39% [22%-56%]) (P = .432, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Similarly, no differences were seen between CD34 distal (39% [24%-64%]) and proximal regions (46% [28%-63%]) (P = .846, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) or CD146 distal (40% [12%-65%]) and proximal regions (40% [22%-51%]) (P ≥ .999, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: Analysis of UCL tissues demonstrated equal distributions of vascular endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell markers throughout the proximal and distal UCL. Unlike that of the medial collateral ligament of the knee, the microvascular composition of the proximal and distal UCL insertions was not different, suggesting a well-vascularized ligament throughout its course. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings investigate one of the possible contributors to UCL healing after injury, which may provide insight into operative and nonoperative management of UCL injuries in the future. This study also indicates that reasons other than differences in progenitor cell density alone may explain the clinical healing differences seen between proximal and distal UCL tears. A better understanding of the microvascular environment and associated blood supply is warranted to understand the healing capability of the UCL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60245432018-07-05 Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study Frangiamore, Salvatore J. Morris, Elizabeth R. Scibetta, Alex C. Chahla, Jorge Moatshe, Gilbert Civitarese, David Provencher, Matthew T. Hackett, Thomas R. Schickendantz, Mark S. Huard, Johnny LaPrade, Robert F. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Vascular-derived progenitor and endothelial cell populations (CD31, CD34, CD146) are capable of multipotent differentiation at the site of injured ligamentous tissue to aid in the intrinsic healing response. Proximal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have been reported to have better healing capability when compared with distal UCL tears. PURPOSE: To compare the vascular composition of the proximal and distal insertions of the anterior bundle of the UCL of the elbow via known markers of endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cells (CD31, CD34, CD146). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: UCLs were harvested from 10 nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows and transected into proximal and distal portions. Endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell densities were assessed with 4 staining groups: CD31 (immunohistochemistry) and CD31/α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), CD34/α-SMA, and CD146/α-SMA (immunofluorescence). CD31 immunohistochemistry identified endothelial progenitor cells in the UCL. Later staining of the same slides with α-SMA demonstrated the relationship of progenitor cells to the surrounding vasculature. Fluorescent staining was quantified by calculating the proportion of positively stained nuclei versus the total number of nuclei in the proximal and distal UCL. RESULTS: CD31+ cells were present in the proximal and distal sections of all 10 UCLs. Fluorescent staining revealed no significant differences in the ratio of CD31 to total nuclei between the distal (median, 36% [range, 23%-53%]) and proximal UCL (39% [22%-56%]) (P = .432, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Similarly, no differences were seen between CD34 distal (39% [24%-64%]) and proximal regions (46% [28%-63%]) (P = .846, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) or CD146 distal (40% [12%-65%]) and proximal regions (40% [22%-51%]) (P ≥ .999, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: Analysis of UCL tissues demonstrated equal distributions of vascular endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell markers throughout the proximal and distal UCL. Unlike that of the medial collateral ligament of the knee, the microvascular composition of the proximal and distal UCL insertions was not different, suggesting a well-vascularized ligament throughout its course. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings investigate one of the possible contributors to UCL healing after injury, which may provide insight into operative and nonoperative management of UCL injuries in the future. This study also indicates that reasons other than differences in progenitor cell density alone may explain the clinical healing differences seen between proximal and distal UCL tears. A better understanding of the microvascular environment and associated blood supply is warranted to understand the healing capability of the UCL. SAGE Publications 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6024543/ /pubmed/29977939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118777825 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
Morris, Elizabeth R.
Scibetta, Alex C.
Chahla, Jorge
Moatshe, Gilbert
Civitarese, David
Provencher, Matthew T.
Hackett, Thomas R.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
Huard, Johnny
LaPrade, Robert F.
Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study
title Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study
title_full Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study
title_short Evaluation of Endothelial and Vascular-Derived Progenitor Cell Populations in the Proximal and Distal UCL of the Elbow: A Comparative Study
title_sort evaluation of endothelial and vascular-derived progenitor cell populations in the proximal and distal ucl of the elbow: a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118777825
work_keys_str_mv AT frangiamoresalvatorej evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT morriselizabethr evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT scibettaalexc evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT chahlajorge evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT moatshegilbert evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT civitaresedavid evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT provenchermatthewt evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT hackettthomasr evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT schickendantzmarks evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT huardjohnny evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy
AT lapraderobertf evaluationofendothelialandvascularderivedprogenitorcellpopulationsintheproximalanddistalucloftheelbowacomparativestudy