Cargando…
Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand
(1) Background: As part of the ongoing endeavor to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies in Thailand, renewed interest has been shown in oral vaccination of dogs as a supplementary tool to increase vaccination coverage of the dog population. (2) Methods: Three different bait types were tested using a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29734697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020047 |
_version_ | 1783336110659731456 |
---|---|
author | Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Chanachai, Karoon Pinyopummintr, Tanu Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda Sujit, Kitipat Vos, Ad |
author_facet | Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Chanachai, Karoon Pinyopummintr, Tanu Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda Sujit, Kitipat Vos, Ad |
author_sort | Kasemsuwan, Suwicha |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: As part of the ongoing endeavor to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies in Thailand, renewed interest has been shown in oral vaccination of dogs as a supplementary tool to increase vaccination coverage of the dog population. (2) Methods: Three different bait types were tested using a hand-out model on the campus of the Kasetsart University and the surrounding temples in Thailand during September 2017, consisting of two industrial manufactured baits (fish meal and egg-flavored) and one bait made from local material (boiled pig intestine placed in collagen casing). A PVC-capsule containing dyed water was inserted in the bait. (3) Results: The fishmeal bait was significantly less often accepted and consumed (50.29%) than the other two baits (intestine bait—79.19%; egg bait—78.77%). Delivery and release of the dyed water in the oral cavity was highest in the egg-flavored bait (84.50%), followed by the intestine bait (76.61%) and fishmeal (54.85%) baits. Bait acceptance was influenced by sex, age, and body size of the dog. Also, the origin of the dogs had a significant effect: temple dogs accepted the baits more often than street dogs. (4) Conclusion: A significant portion of the free-roaming dog population in this study can be vaccinated by offering vaccine baits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6024691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60246912018-07-08 Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Chanachai, Karoon Pinyopummintr, Tanu Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda Sujit, Kitipat Vos, Ad Vet Sci Article (1) Background: As part of the ongoing endeavor to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies in Thailand, renewed interest has been shown in oral vaccination of dogs as a supplementary tool to increase vaccination coverage of the dog population. (2) Methods: Three different bait types were tested using a hand-out model on the campus of the Kasetsart University and the surrounding temples in Thailand during September 2017, consisting of two industrial manufactured baits (fish meal and egg-flavored) and one bait made from local material (boiled pig intestine placed in collagen casing). A PVC-capsule containing dyed water was inserted in the bait. (3) Results: The fishmeal bait was significantly less often accepted and consumed (50.29%) than the other two baits (intestine bait—79.19%; egg bait—78.77%). Delivery and release of the dyed water in the oral cavity was highest in the egg-flavored bait (84.50%), followed by the intestine bait (76.61%) and fishmeal (54.85%) baits. Bait acceptance was influenced by sex, age, and body size of the dog. Also, the origin of the dogs had a significant effect: temple dogs accepted the baits more often than street dogs. (4) Conclusion: A significant portion of the free-roaming dog population in this study can be vaccinated by offering vaccine baits. MDPI 2018-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6024691/ /pubmed/29734697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020047 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Chanachai, Karoon Pinyopummintr, Tanu Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda Sujit, Kitipat Vos, Ad Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand |
title | Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand |
title_full | Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand |
title_fullStr | Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed | Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand |
title_short | Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand |
title_sort | field studies evaluating bait acceptance and handling by free-roaming dogs in thailand |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29734697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasemsuwansuwicha fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand AT chanachaikaroon fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand AT pinyopummintrtanu fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand AT leelalapongsathonkansuda fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand AT sujitkitipat fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand AT vosad fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand |