Cargando…

Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand

(1) Background: As part of the ongoing endeavor to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies in Thailand, renewed interest has been shown in oral vaccination of dogs as a supplementary tool to increase vaccination coverage of the dog population. (2) Methods: Three different bait types were tested using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasemsuwan, Suwicha, Chanachai, Karoon, Pinyopummintr, Tanu, Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda, Sujit, Kitipat, Vos, Ad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29734697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020047
_version_ 1783336110659731456
author Kasemsuwan, Suwicha
Chanachai, Karoon
Pinyopummintr, Tanu
Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda
Sujit, Kitipat
Vos, Ad
author_facet Kasemsuwan, Suwicha
Chanachai, Karoon
Pinyopummintr, Tanu
Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda
Sujit, Kitipat
Vos, Ad
author_sort Kasemsuwan, Suwicha
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: As part of the ongoing endeavor to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies in Thailand, renewed interest has been shown in oral vaccination of dogs as a supplementary tool to increase vaccination coverage of the dog population. (2) Methods: Three different bait types were tested using a hand-out model on the campus of the Kasetsart University and the surrounding temples in Thailand during September 2017, consisting of two industrial manufactured baits (fish meal and egg-flavored) and one bait made from local material (boiled pig intestine placed in collagen casing). A PVC-capsule containing dyed water was inserted in the bait. (3) Results: The fishmeal bait was significantly less often accepted and consumed (50.29%) than the other two baits (intestine bait—79.19%; egg bait—78.77%). Delivery and release of the dyed water in the oral cavity was highest in the egg-flavored bait (84.50%), followed by the intestine bait (76.61%) and fishmeal (54.85%) baits. Bait acceptance was influenced by sex, age, and body size of the dog. Also, the origin of the dogs had a significant effect: temple dogs accepted the baits more often than street dogs. (4) Conclusion: A significant portion of the free-roaming dog population in this study can be vaccinated by offering vaccine baits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60246912018-07-08 Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand Kasemsuwan, Suwicha Chanachai, Karoon Pinyopummintr, Tanu Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda Sujit, Kitipat Vos, Ad Vet Sci Article (1) Background: As part of the ongoing endeavor to eliminate dog-mediated human rabies in Thailand, renewed interest has been shown in oral vaccination of dogs as a supplementary tool to increase vaccination coverage of the dog population. (2) Methods: Three different bait types were tested using a hand-out model on the campus of the Kasetsart University and the surrounding temples in Thailand during September 2017, consisting of two industrial manufactured baits (fish meal and egg-flavored) and one bait made from local material (boiled pig intestine placed in collagen casing). A PVC-capsule containing dyed water was inserted in the bait. (3) Results: The fishmeal bait was significantly less often accepted and consumed (50.29%) than the other two baits (intestine bait—79.19%; egg bait—78.77%). Delivery and release of the dyed water in the oral cavity was highest in the egg-flavored bait (84.50%), followed by the intestine bait (76.61%) and fishmeal (54.85%) baits. Bait acceptance was influenced by sex, age, and body size of the dog. Also, the origin of the dogs had a significant effect: temple dogs accepted the baits more often than street dogs. (4) Conclusion: A significant portion of the free-roaming dog population in this study can be vaccinated by offering vaccine baits. MDPI 2018-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6024691/ /pubmed/29734697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020047 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kasemsuwan, Suwicha
Chanachai, Karoon
Pinyopummintr, Tanu
Leelalapongsathon, Kansuda
Sujit, Kitipat
Vos, Ad
Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand
title Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand
title_full Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand
title_fullStr Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand
title_short Field Studies Evaluating Bait Acceptance and Handling by Free-Roaming Dogs in Thailand
title_sort field studies evaluating bait acceptance and handling by free-roaming dogs in thailand
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29734697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020047
work_keys_str_mv AT kasemsuwansuwicha fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand
AT chanachaikaroon fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand
AT pinyopummintrtanu fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand
AT leelalapongsathonkansuda fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand
AT sujitkitipat fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand
AT vosad fieldstudiesevaluatingbaitacceptanceandhandlingbyfreeroamingdogsinthailand