Cargando…

A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation

We aimed to determine whether a cumulative dose of vitamin D(3) produces the same effects on the serum concentration of 25(OH)D(3) if it is given daily or monthly. This is a monocentric, two-armed, randomized, interventional, open, and parallel study conducted from November 2016 to March 2017 in Bel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Niet, Sophie, Coffiner, Monte, Da Silva, Stéphanie, Jandrain, Bernard, Souberbielle, Jean-Claude, Cavalier, Etienne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29882841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10060659
_version_ 1783336113500323840
author De Niet, Sophie
Coffiner, Monte
Da Silva, Stéphanie
Jandrain, Bernard
Souberbielle, Jean-Claude
Cavalier, Etienne
author_facet De Niet, Sophie
Coffiner, Monte
Da Silva, Stéphanie
Jandrain, Bernard
Souberbielle, Jean-Claude
Cavalier, Etienne
author_sort De Niet, Sophie
collection PubMed
description We aimed to determine whether a cumulative dose of vitamin D(3) produces the same effects on the serum concentration of 25(OH)D(3) if it is given daily or monthly. This is a monocentric, two-armed, randomized, interventional, open, and parallel study conducted from November 2016 to March 2017 in Belgium. We randomized 60 subjects with vitamin D deficiency to receive 2000 IU vitamin D(3) daily or 50,000 IU monthly. The same cumulative dose of vitamin D(3) was given to each treatment group (150,000 IU). The 25(OH)D(3) serum concentrations from baseline to day 75 were 14.3 ± 3.7 to 27.8 ± 3.9 ng/mL in the monthly group and 14.1 ± 3.4 to 28.8 ± 5.4 ng/mL in the daily group. The mean change versus the baseline level was significantly different between the groups at day 2, 4, 7, and 14 and no longer different from day 25. One day after the intake of vitamin D(3), as expected, serum 25(OH)D(3) and 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) increased significantly in the monthly group, whereas they did not change significantly in the daily group. The median time to reach the 20 ng/mL target concentration was significantly different in the two groups, in favor of the monthly regimen (1 day versus 14 days; p = 0.02). In conclusion, a monthly administration of 50,000 IU vitamin D(3) provides an effective tool for a rapid normalization of 25(OH)D(3) in deficient subjects. A daily administration of the same cumulative dose is similarly effective but takes two weeks longer to reach the desirable level of 20 ng/mL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60247032018-07-08 A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation De Niet, Sophie Coffiner, Monte Da Silva, Stéphanie Jandrain, Bernard Souberbielle, Jean-Claude Cavalier, Etienne Nutrients Article We aimed to determine whether a cumulative dose of vitamin D(3) produces the same effects on the serum concentration of 25(OH)D(3) if it is given daily or monthly. This is a monocentric, two-armed, randomized, interventional, open, and parallel study conducted from November 2016 to March 2017 in Belgium. We randomized 60 subjects with vitamin D deficiency to receive 2000 IU vitamin D(3) daily or 50,000 IU monthly. The same cumulative dose of vitamin D(3) was given to each treatment group (150,000 IU). The 25(OH)D(3) serum concentrations from baseline to day 75 were 14.3 ± 3.7 to 27.8 ± 3.9 ng/mL in the monthly group and 14.1 ± 3.4 to 28.8 ± 5.4 ng/mL in the daily group. The mean change versus the baseline level was significantly different between the groups at day 2, 4, 7, and 14 and no longer different from day 25. One day after the intake of vitamin D(3), as expected, serum 25(OH)D(3) and 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) increased significantly in the monthly group, whereas they did not change significantly in the daily group. The median time to reach the 20 ng/mL target concentration was significantly different in the two groups, in favor of the monthly regimen (1 day versus 14 days; p = 0.02). In conclusion, a monthly administration of 50,000 IU vitamin D(3) provides an effective tool for a rapid normalization of 25(OH)D(3) in deficient subjects. A daily administration of the same cumulative dose is similarly effective but takes two weeks longer to reach the desirable level of 20 ng/mL. MDPI 2018-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6024703/ /pubmed/29882841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10060659 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Niet, Sophie
Coffiner, Monte
Da Silva, Stéphanie
Jandrain, Bernard
Souberbielle, Jean-Claude
Cavalier, Etienne
A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation
title A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation
title_full A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation
title_fullStr A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation
title_short A Randomized Study to Compare a Monthly to a Daily Administration of Vitamin D(3) Supplementation
title_sort randomized study to compare a monthly to a daily administration of vitamin d(3) supplementation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29882841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10060659
work_keys_str_mv AT denietsophie arandomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT coffinermonte arandomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT dasilvastephanie arandomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT jandrainbernard arandomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT souberbiellejeanclaude arandomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT cavalieretienne arandomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT denietsophie randomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT coffinermonte randomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT dasilvastephanie randomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT jandrainbernard randomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT souberbiellejeanclaude randomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation
AT cavalieretienne randomizedstudytocompareamonthlytoadailyadministrationofvitamind3supplementation