Cargando…
Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study
BACKGROUND: There is growing indications of minimally invasive spine surgery. The inherent attitude and institutive learning curve limit transition from standard open surgery to minimally invasive surgery demanding understanding of new instruments and correlative anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008531 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_47_18 |
_version_ | 1783336122137444352 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Suyash Sardhara, Jayesh C Khatri, Deepak Joseph, Jeena Parab, Abhijit N Bhaisora, Kamlesh S Das, Kuntal Kanti Mehrotra, Anant Srivastava, Arun Kumar Behari, Sanjay |
author_facet | Singh, Suyash Sardhara, Jayesh C Khatri, Deepak Joseph, Jeena Parab, Abhijit N Bhaisora, Kamlesh S Das, Kuntal Kanti Mehrotra, Anant Srivastava, Arun Kumar Behari, Sanjay |
author_sort | Singh, Suyash |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is growing indications of minimally invasive spine surgery. The inherent attitude and institutive learning curve limit transition from standard open surgery to minimally invasive surgery demanding understanding of new instruments and correlative anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 80 patients operated for lumbar disc prolapse were included in the study (between January 2016 and March 2018). Fifty patients (Group A) operated by various minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques for herniated disc disease were compared with randomly selected 30 patients (Group B) operated between the same time interval by standard open approach. Surgical outcome with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and patient satisfaction score was calculated in pre- and postoperative periods. RESULTS: Mean preoperative ODI score in Group A was 31.52 ± 7.5 standard deviation (SD) (range: 6“46; interquartile range [IQR]: 8; median: 32.11) and postoperative ODI score was 9.20 ± 87.8 SD (range: 0“38; IQR: 11; median: 6.67). Mean preoperative ODI score in Group B was 26.47 ± 4.9 SD (range: 18“38; IQR: 4; median: 25) and postoperative ODI score was 12.27 ± 8.4 SD (range: 3“34; IQR: 12; median: 10.0). None of the patients was unsatisfied in either group. On comparing the patient satisfaction score among two groups, no significant difference (P = 0.27) was found. DISCUSSION: On comparing the change in ODI and preoperative ODI among both groups, we found a significant difference between the groups. It is worth shifting from open to MISS accepting small learning curve. The satisfaction score of MISS in early transition period is similar to open procedure. CONCLUSION: The MISS is safe and effective procedure even in transition period for the central and paracentral prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc treatment. The results are comparable, and patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are not compromised. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6024740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60247402018-07-13 Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study Singh, Suyash Sardhara, Jayesh C Khatri, Deepak Joseph, Jeena Parab, Abhijit N Bhaisora, Kamlesh S Das, Kuntal Kanti Mehrotra, Anant Srivastava, Arun Kumar Behari, Sanjay J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: There is growing indications of minimally invasive spine surgery. The inherent attitude and institutive learning curve limit transition from standard open surgery to minimally invasive surgery demanding understanding of new instruments and correlative anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 80 patients operated for lumbar disc prolapse were included in the study (between January 2016 and March 2018). Fifty patients (Group A) operated by various minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques for herniated disc disease were compared with randomly selected 30 patients (Group B) operated between the same time interval by standard open approach. Surgical outcome with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and patient satisfaction score was calculated in pre- and postoperative periods. RESULTS: Mean preoperative ODI score in Group A was 31.52 ± 7.5 standard deviation (SD) (range: 6“46; interquartile range [IQR]: 8; median: 32.11) and postoperative ODI score was 9.20 ± 87.8 SD (range: 0“38; IQR: 11; median: 6.67). Mean preoperative ODI score in Group B was 26.47 ± 4.9 SD (range: 18“38; IQR: 4; median: 25) and postoperative ODI score was 12.27 ± 8.4 SD (range: 3“34; IQR: 12; median: 10.0). None of the patients was unsatisfied in either group. On comparing the patient satisfaction score among two groups, no significant difference (P = 0.27) was found. DISCUSSION: On comparing the change in ODI and preoperative ODI among both groups, we found a significant difference between the groups. It is worth shifting from open to MISS accepting small learning curve. The satisfaction score of MISS in early transition period is similar to open procedure. CONCLUSION: The MISS is safe and effective procedure even in transition period for the central and paracentral prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc treatment. The results are comparable, and patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are not compromised. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6024740/ /pubmed/30008531 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_47_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Suyash Sardhara, Jayesh C Khatri, Deepak Joseph, Jeena Parab, Abhijit N Bhaisora, Kamlesh S Das, Kuntal Kanti Mehrotra, Anant Srivastava, Arun Kumar Behari, Sanjay Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study |
title | Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study |
title_full | Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study |
title_fullStr | Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study |
title_short | Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study |
title_sort | technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: a prospective study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008531 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_47_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhsuyash technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT sardharajayeshc technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT khatrideepak technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT josephjeena technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT parababhijitn technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT bhaisorakamleshs technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT daskuntalkanti technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT mehrotraanant technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT srivastavaarunkumar technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy AT beharisanjay technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy |