Cargando…

Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study

BACKGROUND: There is growing indications of minimally invasive spine surgery. The inherent attitude and institutive learning curve limit transition from standard open surgery to minimally invasive surgery demanding understanding of new instruments and correlative anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Suyash, Sardhara, Jayesh C, Khatri, Deepak, Joseph, Jeena, Parab, Abhijit N, Bhaisora, Kamlesh S, Das, Kuntal Kanti, Mehrotra, Anant, Srivastava, Arun Kumar, Behari, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008531
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_47_18
_version_ 1783336122137444352
author Singh, Suyash
Sardhara, Jayesh C
Khatri, Deepak
Joseph, Jeena
Parab, Abhijit N
Bhaisora, Kamlesh S
Das, Kuntal Kanti
Mehrotra, Anant
Srivastava, Arun Kumar
Behari, Sanjay
author_facet Singh, Suyash
Sardhara, Jayesh C
Khatri, Deepak
Joseph, Jeena
Parab, Abhijit N
Bhaisora, Kamlesh S
Das, Kuntal Kanti
Mehrotra, Anant
Srivastava, Arun Kumar
Behari, Sanjay
author_sort Singh, Suyash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing indications of minimally invasive spine surgery. The inherent attitude and institutive learning curve limit transition from standard open surgery to minimally invasive surgery demanding understanding of new instruments and correlative anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 80 patients operated for lumbar disc prolapse were included in the study (between January 2016 and March 2018). Fifty patients (Group A) operated by various minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques for herniated disc disease were compared with randomly selected 30 patients (Group B) operated between the same time interval by standard open approach. Surgical outcome with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and patient satisfaction score was calculated in pre- and postoperative periods. RESULTS: Mean preoperative ODI score in Group A was 31.52 ± 7.5 standard deviation (SD) (range: 6“46; interquartile range [IQR]: 8; median: 32.11) and postoperative ODI score was 9.20 ± 87.8 SD (range: 0“38; IQR: 11; median: 6.67). Mean preoperative ODI score in Group B was 26.47 ± 4.9 SD (range: 18“38; IQR: 4; median: 25) and postoperative ODI score was 12.27 ± 8.4 SD (range: 3“34; IQR: 12; median: 10.0). None of the patients was unsatisfied in either group. On comparing the patient satisfaction score among two groups, no significant difference (P = 0.27) was found. DISCUSSION: On comparing the change in ODI and preoperative ODI among both groups, we found a significant difference between the groups. It is worth shifting from open to MISS accepting small learning curve. The satisfaction score of MISS in early transition period is similar to open procedure. CONCLUSION: The MISS is safe and effective procedure even in transition period for the central and paracentral prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc treatment. The results are comparable, and patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are not compromised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60247402018-07-13 Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study Singh, Suyash Sardhara, Jayesh C Khatri, Deepak Joseph, Jeena Parab, Abhijit N Bhaisora, Kamlesh S Das, Kuntal Kanti Mehrotra, Anant Srivastava, Arun Kumar Behari, Sanjay J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: There is growing indications of minimally invasive spine surgery. The inherent attitude and institutive learning curve limit transition from standard open surgery to minimally invasive surgery demanding understanding of new instruments and correlative anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 80 patients operated for lumbar disc prolapse were included in the study (between January 2016 and March 2018). Fifty patients (Group A) operated by various minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques for herniated disc disease were compared with randomly selected 30 patients (Group B) operated between the same time interval by standard open approach. Surgical outcome with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and patient satisfaction score was calculated in pre- and postoperative periods. RESULTS: Mean preoperative ODI score in Group A was 31.52 ± 7.5 standard deviation (SD) (range: 6“46; interquartile range [IQR]: 8; median: 32.11) and postoperative ODI score was 9.20 ± 87.8 SD (range: 0“38; IQR: 11; median: 6.67). Mean preoperative ODI score in Group B was 26.47 ± 4.9 SD (range: 18“38; IQR: 4; median: 25) and postoperative ODI score was 12.27 ± 8.4 SD (range: 3“34; IQR: 12; median: 10.0). None of the patients was unsatisfied in either group. On comparing the patient satisfaction score among two groups, no significant difference (P = 0.27) was found. DISCUSSION: On comparing the change in ODI and preoperative ODI among both groups, we found a significant difference between the groups. It is worth shifting from open to MISS accepting small learning curve. The satisfaction score of MISS in early transition period is similar to open procedure. CONCLUSION: The MISS is safe and effective procedure even in transition period for the central and paracentral prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc treatment. The results are comparable, and patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are not compromised. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6024740/ /pubmed/30008531 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_47_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Suyash
Sardhara, Jayesh C
Khatri, Deepak
Joseph, Jeena
Parab, Abhijit N
Bhaisora, Kamlesh S
Das, Kuntal Kanti
Mehrotra, Anant
Srivastava, Arun Kumar
Behari, Sanjay
Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study
title Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study
title_full Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study
title_fullStr Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study
title_short Technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: A prospective study
title_sort technical pearls and surgical outcome of early transitional period experience in minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: a prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008531
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_47_18
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsuyash technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT sardharajayeshc technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT khatrideepak technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT josephjeena technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT parababhijitn technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT bhaisorakamleshs technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT daskuntalkanti technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT mehrotraanant technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT srivastavaarunkumar technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy
AT beharisanjay technicalpearlsandsurgicaloutcomeofearlytransitionalperiodexperienceinminimallyinvasivelumbardiscectomyaprospectivestudy