Cargando…

Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course

Background: The number of answer options is an important element of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Many MCQs contain four or more options despite the limited literature suggesting that there is little to no benefit beyond three options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate item performance o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Royal, Kenneth, Dorman, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020055
_version_ 1783336135486865408
author Royal, Kenneth
Dorman, David
author_facet Royal, Kenneth
Dorman, David
author_sort Royal, Kenneth
collection PubMed
description Background: The number of answer options is an important element of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Many MCQs contain four or more options despite the limited literature suggesting that there is little to no benefit beyond three options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate item performance on 3-option versus 4-option MCQs used in a core curriculum course in veterinary toxicology at a large veterinary medical school in the United States. Methods: A quasi-experimental, crossover design was used in which students in each class were randomly assigned to take one of two versions (A or B) of two major exams. Results: Both the 3-option and 4-option MCQs resulted in similar psychometric properties. Conclusion: The findings of our study support earlier research in other medical disciplines and settings that likewise concluded there was no significant change in the psychometric properties of three option MCQs when compared to the traditional MCQs with four or more options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6024797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60247972018-07-08 Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course Royal, Kenneth Dorman, David Vet Sci Article Background: The number of answer options is an important element of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Many MCQs contain four or more options despite the limited literature suggesting that there is little to no benefit beyond three options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate item performance on 3-option versus 4-option MCQs used in a core curriculum course in veterinary toxicology at a large veterinary medical school in the United States. Methods: A quasi-experimental, crossover design was used in which students in each class were randomly assigned to take one of two versions (A or B) of two major exams. Results: Both the 3-option and 4-option MCQs resulted in similar psychometric properties. Conclusion: The findings of our study support earlier research in other medical disciplines and settings that likewise concluded there was no significant change in the psychometric properties of three option MCQs when compared to the traditional MCQs with four or more options. MDPI 2018-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6024797/ /pubmed/29890727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020055 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Royal, Kenneth
Dorman, David
Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
title Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
title_full Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
title_fullStr Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
title_short Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
title_sort comparing item performance on three- versus four-option multiple choice questions in a veterinary toxicology course
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020055
work_keys_str_mv AT royalkenneth comparingitemperformanceonthreeversusfouroptionmultiplechoicequestionsinaveterinarytoxicologycourse
AT dormandavid comparingitemperformanceonthreeversusfouroptionmultiplechoicequestionsinaveterinarytoxicologycourse