Cargando…
Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
Background: The number of answer options is an important element of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Many MCQs contain four or more options despite the limited literature suggesting that there is little to no benefit beyond three options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate item performance o...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020055 |
_version_ | 1783336135486865408 |
---|---|
author | Royal, Kenneth Dorman, David |
author_facet | Royal, Kenneth Dorman, David |
author_sort | Royal, Kenneth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The number of answer options is an important element of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Many MCQs contain four or more options despite the limited literature suggesting that there is little to no benefit beyond three options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate item performance on 3-option versus 4-option MCQs used in a core curriculum course in veterinary toxicology at a large veterinary medical school in the United States. Methods: A quasi-experimental, crossover design was used in which students in each class were randomly assigned to take one of two versions (A or B) of two major exams. Results: Both the 3-option and 4-option MCQs resulted in similar psychometric properties. Conclusion: The findings of our study support earlier research in other medical disciplines and settings that likewise concluded there was no significant change in the psychometric properties of three option MCQs when compared to the traditional MCQs with four or more options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6024797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60247972018-07-08 Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course Royal, Kenneth Dorman, David Vet Sci Article Background: The number of answer options is an important element of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Many MCQs contain four or more options despite the limited literature suggesting that there is little to no benefit beyond three options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate item performance on 3-option versus 4-option MCQs used in a core curriculum course in veterinary toxicology at a large veterinary medical school in the United States. Methods: A quasi-experimental, crossover design was used in which students in each class were randomly assigned to take one of two versions (A or B) of two major exams. Results: Both the 3-option and 4-option MCQs resulted in similar psychometric properties. Conclusion: The findings of our study support earlier research in other medical disciplines and settings that likewise concluded there was no significant change in the psychometric properties of three option MCQs when compared to the traditional MCQs with four or more options. MDPI 2018-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6024797/ /pubmed/29890727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020055 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Royal, Kenneth Dorman, David Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course |
title | Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course |
title_full | Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course |
title_fullStr | Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course |
title_short | Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course |
title_sort | comparing item performance on three- versus four-option multiple choice questions in a veterinary toxicology course |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29890727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT royalkenneth comparingitemperformanceonthreeversusfouroptionmultiplechoicequestionsinaveterinarytoxicologycourse AT dormandavid comparingitemperformanceonthreeversusfouroptionmultiplechoicequestionsinaveterinarytoxicologycourse |