Cargando…

Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements

The aim of this in-vitro research was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength in the newly introduced PEKK tooth post with various surface treatments and resin cements. A fiberglass tooth post was included in order to compare it with PEKK as a possible post material. The microtensile bond strengt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Chan-Hong, Choi, Jae-Won, Jeon, Young-Chan, Jeong, Chang-Mo, Lee, So-Hyoun, Kang, Eun-Sook, Yun, Mi-Jung, Huh, Jung-Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844270
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11060916
_version_ 1783336259018555392
author Song, Chan-Hong
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeon, Young-Chan
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Lee, So-Hyoun
Kang, Eun-Sook
Yun, Mi-Jung
Huh, Jung-Bo
author_facet Song, Chan-Hong
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeon, Young-Chan
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Lee, So-Hyoun
Kang, Eun-Sook
Yun, Mi-Jung
Huh, Jung-Bo
author_sort Song, Chan-Hong
collection PubMed
description The aim of this in-vitro research was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength in the newly introduced PEKK tooth post with various surface treatments and resin cements. A fiberglass tooth post was included in order to compare it with PEKK as a possible post material. The microtensile bond strengths of the fiberglass post (FRC Postec Plus) and the PEKK post (Pekkton(®)) were tested using three kinds of self-adhesive resin cements (G-CEM LinkAce, Multilink Speed, and RelyX U200) and one self-etching resin cement (PANAVIA F2.0). The surface treatments of the fiberglass posts were processed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (F1, application of 37% phosphoric acid etching gel and silanization). For the PEKK post groups, various surface treatments were performed like no surface treatment (P1), sandblasting (P2), silica-coating and silanization (P3), and sandblasting with a composite primer (P4). In the surface treatment, PEKK posts with silica coating and silane treatment (P3) showed a significantly higher microtensile bond strength (mean MPa: 18.09, p < 0.05). The highest microtensile bond strength was shown when the PEKK posts were treated with a silica coating and silane treatment and cemented with RelyX U200 (mean MPa: 22.22). The PEKK posts with surface treatments of silica-coating and silanization or sandblasting displayed superior microtensile bond strengths (mean MPa: 18.09 and 16.25, respectively) compared to the conventional fiberglass posts (mean MPa: 14.93, p < 0.05).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6025344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60253442018-07-09 Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements Song, Chan-Hong Choi, Jae-Won Jeon, Young-Chan Jeong, Chang-Mo Lee, So-Hyoun Kang, Eun-Sook Yun, Mi-Jung Huh, Jung-Bo Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this in-vitro research was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength in the newly introduced PEKK tooth post with various surface treatments and resin cements. A fiberglass tooth post was included in order to compare it with PEKK as a possible post material. The microtensile bond strengths of the fiberglass post (FRC Postec Plus) and the PEKK post (Pekkton(®)) were tested using three kinds of self-adhesive resin cements (G-CEM LinkAce, Multilink Speed, and RelyX U200) and one self-etching resin cement (PANAVIA F2.0). The surface treatments of the fiberglass posts were processed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (F1, application of 37% phosphoric acid etching gel and silanization). For the PEKK post groups, various surface treatments were performed like no surface treatment (P1), sandblasting (P2), silica-coating and silanization (P3), and sandblasting with a composite primer (P4). In the surface treatment, PEKK posts with silica coating and silane treatment (P3) showed a significantly higher microtensile bond strength (mean MPa: 18.09, p < 0.05). The highest microtensile bond strength was shown when the PEKK posts were treated with a silica coating and silane treatment and cemented with RelyX U200 (mean MPa: 22.22). The PEKK posts with surface treatments of silica-coating and silanization or sandblasting displayed superior microtensile bond strengths (mean MPa: 18.09 and 16.25, respectively) compared to the conventional fiberglass posts (mean MPa: 14.93, p < 0.05). MDPI 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6025344/ /pubmed/29844270 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11060916 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Song, Chan-Hong
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeon, Young-Chan
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Lee, So-Hyoun
Kang, Eun-Sook
Yun, Mi-Jung
Huh, Jung-Bo
Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements
title Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements
title_full Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements
title_fullStr Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements
title_short Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements
title_sort comparison of the microtensile bond strength of a polyetherketoneketone (pekk) tooth post cemented with various surface treatments and various resin cements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844270
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11060916
work_keys_str_mv AT songchanhong comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements
AT choijaewon comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements
AT jeonyoungchan comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements
AT jeongchangmo comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements
AT leesohyoun comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements
AT kangeunsook comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements
AT yunmijung comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements
AT huhjungbo comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofapolyetherketoneketonepekktoothpostcementedwithvarioussurfacetreatmentsandvariousresincements