Cargando…

Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription

Background: In an acute hospital setting, a multi-disciplinary approach to medication review can improve prescribing and medicine selection in patients with frailty. There is a need for a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists to ensure that interventions have the great...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marvin, Vanessa, Ward, Emily, Jubraj, Barry, Bower, Mark, Bovill, Iñaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659552
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020032
_version_ 1783336261112561664
author Marvin, Vanessa
Ward, Emily
Jubraj, Barry
Bower, Mark
Bovill, Iñaki
author_facet Marvin, Vanessa
Ward, Emily
Jubraj, Barry
Bower, Mark
Bovill, Iñaki
author_sort Marvin, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description Background: In an acute hospital setting, a multi-disciplinary approach to medication review can improve prescribing and medicine selection in patients with frailty. There is a need for a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists to ensure that interventions have the greatest impact on patient care. Aim: To use a consensus building process to produce guidance for pharmacists to support the identification of patients at risk from their medicines, and to articulate expected actions and escalation processes. Methods: A literature search was conducted and evidence used to establish a set of ten scenarios often encountered in hospitalised patients, with six or more possible actions. Four consultant physicians and four senior pharmacists ranked their levels of agreement with the listed actions. The process was redrafted and repeated until consensus was reached and interventions were defined. Outcome: Generalised guidance for reviewing older adults’ medicines was developed, alongside escalation processes that should be followed in a specific set of clinical situations. The panel agreed that both pharmacists and physicians have an active role to play in medication review, and face-to-face communication is always preferable to facilitate informed decision making. Only prescribers should deprescribe, however pharmacists who are not also trained as prescribers may temporarily “hold” medications in the best interests of the patient with appropriate documentation and a follow up discussion with the prescribing team. The consensus was that a combination of age, problematic polypharmacy, and the presence of medication-related problems, were the most important factors in the identification of patients who would benefit most from a comprehensive medication review. Conclusions: Guidance on the identification of patients on inappropriate medicines, and subsequent pharmacist-led intervention to prompt and promote deprescribing, has been developed for implementation in an acute hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6025353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60253532018-07-09 Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription Marvin, Vanessa Ward, Emily Jubraj, Barry Bower, Mark Bovill, Iñaki Pharmacy (Basel) Project Report Background: In an acute hospital setting, a multi-disciplinary approach to medication review can improve prescribing and medicine selection in patients with frailty. There is a need for a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists to ensure that interventions have the greatest impact on patient care. Aim: To use a consensus building process to produce guidance for pharmacists to support the identification of patients at risk from their medicines, and to articulate expected actions and escalation processes. Methods: A literature search was conducted and evidence used to establish a set of ten scenarios often encountered in hospitalised patients, with six or more possible actions. Four consultant physicians and four senior pharmacists ranked their levels of agreement with the listed actions. The process was redrafted and repeated until consensus was reached and interventions were defined. Outcome: Generalised guidance for reviewing older adults’ medicines was developed, alongside escalation processes that should be followed in a specific set of clinical situations. The panel agreed that both pharmacists and physicians have an active role to play in medication review, and face-to-face communication is always preferable to facilitate informed decision making. Only prescribers should deprescribe, however pharmacists who are not also trained as prescribers may temporarily “hold” medications in the best interests of the patient with appropriate documentation and a follow up discussion with the prescribing team. The consensus was that a combination of age, problematic polypharmacy, and the presence of medication-related problems, were the most important factors in the identification of patients who would benefit most from a comprehensive medication review. Conclusions: Guidance on the identification of patients on inappropriate medicines, and subsequent pharmacist-led intervention to prompt and promote deprescribing, has been developed for implementation in an acute hospital. MDPI 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6025353/ /pubmed/29659552 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020032 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Project Report
Marvin, Vanessa
Ward, Emily
Jubraj, Barry
Bower, Mark
Bovill, Iñaki
Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription
title Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription
title_full Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription
title_fullStr Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription
title_full_unstemmed Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription
title_short Improving Pharmacists’ Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription
title_sort improving pharmacists’ targeting of patients for medication review and deprescription
topic Project Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659552
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020032
work_keys_str_mv AT marvinvanessa improvingpharmaciststargetingofpatientsformedicationreviewanddeprescription
AT wardemily improvingpharmaciststargetingofpatientsformedicationreviewanddeprescription
AT jubrajbarry improvingpharmaciststargetingofpatientsformedicationreviewanddeprescription
AT bowermark improvingpharmaciststargetingofpatientsformedicationreviewanddeprescription
AT bovillinaki improvingpharmaciststargetingofpatientsformedicationreviewanddeprescription