Cargando…

AGREEMENT IN DIAGNOSIS OF KNEE INJURIES BY ORTHOPEDISTS WITH CLINICAL EXPERIENCE IN KNEE TREATMENT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the level of agreement in diagnosing knee injury among orthopedists with clinical experience in knee treatment. METHOD: An online questionnaire was used to analyze the ability of orthopedic knee surgeons to diagnose intra-articular knee injuries using MRI, the importance given...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: PROTTA, THIAGO ROCHA, SANTOS, LARA GUERCIO DOS, KUSABARA, ALEXANDRE, PHILIP, DIEGO, GRISPUN, JONAS, NAVARRO, MARCELO SCHIMITD
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29977137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220182601182145
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To analyze the level of agreement in diagnosing knee injury among orthopedists with clinical experience in knee treatment. METHOD: An online questionnaire was used to analyze the ability of orthopedic knee surgeons to diagnose intra-articular knee injuries using MRI, the importance given to this test in their clinical practice, and the agreement between these diagnoses and the radiology report. RESULTS: The study participants considered MRI an important tool for clarifying inconclusive diagnoses and surgical planning. The level of agreement between the surgeons and the radiologist was considered to be very slight for posterior cruciate ligament injuries, collateral ligament injuries, and chondral injuries, and was considered slight for anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of intra-articular knee injury must be based on the patient history, physical examination, and radiological imaging (MRI) in order to provide a complete approach to the patient. Level of Evidence III; Clinical study.